Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650

Qualcomm Snapdragon 435

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 435

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (SD435) is a lower mainstream SoC for (Android based) smartphones and tablets. Contrary to the Snapdragon 630, it is still manufactured in a 28-nm process and also consists of an octa-core CPU part with ARM Cortex-A53 cores. However, they are only clocked at up to 1.4 GHz. The integrated X9 LTE modem supports Cat. 4 with maximum transfer rates of 300 Mbps (downstream) and 100 Mbps (upstream). The SoC also includes an Adreno 505 GPU with support for Vulkan and OpenGL ES 3.1. WiFi 802.11ac and Bluetooth 4.1 are supported as well. The memory controller supports LPDDR3 clocked at 800 MHz (so probably dual-channel DDRL-1600). The main difference to the Snapdragon 430 is the faster LTE modem.

HiSilicon Kirin 650

► remove from comparison  Kirin 650

The HiSilicon Kirin 650 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC for mid-range smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2016 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores. Four cores can be clocked with up to 1.7 GHz (power saving cores) and four with up to 2 GHz (performance cores). Furthermore, a ARM Mali-T830 MP2 graphics card (at 600 MHz with 40.8 GFLOPS), a 64-Bit LPDDR3 memory controller and a dual-sim capable LTE Cat. 6 (max. 300 MBit/s and GSM, WCDMA, UMTS, HSPA+) radio are integrated in the SoC.

The processor performance can be compared with the older Kirin 930 and therefore sufficient for daily usage as browsing and non demanding apps. High-end SoCs with Cortex-A57 or A72 cores however should be noticeably faster.

The SoC is produced in a modern 16nm FinFET process and is therefore very power efficient.

 

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 435HiSilicon Kirin 650
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM8936 compare1.7 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 « 1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
JLQ JR510 compare1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 650 « 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1400 MHz2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology28 nm16 nm
FeaturesAdreno 505 GPU, 802.11ac WLAN, Bluetooth 4.1, LTE Cat. 7, Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1600 Memory ControllerARMv8-ISA, Mali-T830 MP2, Dual SIM LTE (Cat. 6), LPDDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 505ARM Mali-T830 MP2 (900 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 435 +
7935 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
435 +
7745 Points (6%)
11640 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
435 +
min: 7095     avg: 8887     median: 9015.5 (8%)     max: 9345 Points
min: 13588     avg: 13632     median: 13632 (11%)     max: 13676 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
435 +
min: 1028     avg: 1199     median: 1167.5 (14%)     max: 1352 Points
1440 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 435 +
min: 1002     avg: 1182     median: 1152 (13%)     max: 1382 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 435 +
min: 637     avg: 663     median: 666 (7%)     max: 691 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 435 +
min: 2210     avg: 2610     median: 2582 (3%)     max: 2889 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 435 +
577 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 435 +
2308 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3768     avg: 3841     median: 3841 (6%)     max: 3914 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 883     avg: 895     median: 894.5 (13%)     max: 906 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
435 +
min: 11007     avg: 12667     median: 12750 (15%)     max: 13586 ms
min: 9111     avg: 9254     median: 9254 (11%)     max: 9397 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 435 +
1979 ms (22%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
435 +
min: 2689     avg: 3112     median: 3209 (3%)     max: 3314 Points
min: 4188     avg: 4472     median: 4472 (4%)     max: 4756 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 435 +
27 Points (6%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
1434 Points (38%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
1965 Points (44%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
3356 Points (44%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
435 +
min: 42643     avg: 44884     median: 45572 (16%)     max: 46814 Points
min: 50366     avg: 51755     median: 51754.5 (18%)     max: 53143 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
100%
1 435 +
min: 4213     avg: 4532     median: 4581.5 (14%)     max: 4750 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
100%
1 435 +
min: 14261     avg: 15880     median: 16055.5 (20%)     max: 17146 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
100%
1 435 +
min: 9541     avg: 9568     median: 9563 (3%)     max: 9605 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
100%
1 435 +
min: 27075     avg: 27665     median: 27740 (17%)     max: 28105 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 435 +
min: 56672     avg: 57644     median: 57289 (10%)     max: 59326 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
435 +
81667 Points (11%)
142543 Points (19%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 435 +
min: 1646     avg: 1876     median: 1875.5 (10%)     max: 2105 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 435 +
min: 4303     avg: 6883     median: 6882.5 (15%)     max: 9462 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 435 +
min: 3538     avg: 3737     median: 3710 (24%)     max: 3928 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
435 +
min: 4316     avg: 4876     median: 4814.5 (24%)     max: 5438 Points
min: 5120     avg: 5230     median: 5229.5 (26%)     max: 5339 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 650 → 133% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 02. 22:34:44

#0 checking url part for id 8506 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8075 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 May 2024 05:34:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.065s ... 0.066s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.066s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8506 +0.003s ... 0.07s

#7 got single benchmarks 8506 +0.048s ... 0.117s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8075 +0.004s ... 0.121s

#9 got single benchmarks 8075 +0.014s ... 0.135s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.135s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.137s ... 0.272s

#12 return log +0.031s ... 0.303s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)