Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 vs Mediatek MT6750T

Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 410 APQ8016

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 (APQ8016) is a ARM based mid-range SoC for tablets and smartphones (mostly Android based). It was announced in Dec. 2013 and was the first 64-Bit SoC by Qualcomm. It integrates four ARM Cortex-A53 (quad-core) processor cores, a Adreno 306 graphics card, a 64 Bit LPDDR2/3 memory controller and WLAN, Bluetooth, and UMTS/LTE radio. Compared to the MSM8916, the APQ8016 lacks the integrated cellular radio (3G, 4G, LTE) and is usually clocked lower (1.2 vs 1.4 GHz).

Mediatek MT6750T

► remove from comparison  MT6750T

The ARM-based Mediatek MT6750T SoC (System on a Chip) is a mid-range mobile processor announced in Q2 2016 for smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It integrates 8 ARM Cortex-A53 cores consisting of 4 high-performance cores clocked at up to 1.5 GHz plus 4 low-power cores clocked at up to 1 GHz each. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a Cat. 6 LTE radio and an ARM Mali-T860 MP2 GPU with 802.11n WiFi and Bluetooth connectivity. The difference to the MT6750 is not clear.

The Cortex-A53 is the successor to the Cortex-A7 and introduces 64-Bit support (ARMv8-ISA). Its performance-per-Watt is significantly higher and is even slightly ahead of the old Cortex-A9. If utilizing all 8 of its cores, the Cortex-A53 can rival competing mobile processes in the high-end class range. However, no practical software has been specifically coded to use all 8 cores at such high performance levels.

The integrated GPU is the modern ARM Mali-T860 MP2 (two clusters) clocked at up to 520 MHz. It should be able to run all current Android games.

In addition to the CPU and GPU cores, the SoC also contains a memory controller and the aforementioned Cat.6 LTE modem (FDD/TDD, DC-HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA2000, EDGE) with both 802.11n WiFi and Bluetooth. The integrated video engine is able to record and playback 1080p videos at up to 30 FPS in hardware. Cameras are supported at up to 16 MP.

The MT6750 is still manufactured in 28nm and so power efficiency is not on par with modern 14/16nm chips.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016Mediatek MT6750T
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Mediatek Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM8936 compare1.7 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 « 1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T « 1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1200 MHz1500 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 48 / 8
Technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesAdreno 306 GPU, WLAN, Bluetooth, NFC, GPS/GLOSNASS/BeiDou, 32/64 Bit LPDDR2/3 Memory ControllerCat. 6 LTE (FDD & TDD), DC-HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA2000, EDGE, 802.11a/b/g/n WiFi, Bluetooth, 16 MP ISP, 1080p recording/playback, ARM Mali-T860 MP2 GPU
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 306ARM Mali-T860 MP2 ( - 530 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 8548     avg: 8759     median: 8758.5 (7%)     max: 8969 Points
8397 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
8667 Points (7%)
8795 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 9168     avg: 9212     median: 9212 (8%)     max: 9256 Points
min: 8284     avg: 9132     median: 9131.5 (8%)     max: 9979 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 MT6750T +
min: 915     avg: 918     median: 917.5 (11%)     max: 920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
724 Points (8%)
min: 904     avg: 988     median: 988 (11%)     max: 1072 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MT6750T +
min: 643     avg: 659     median: 658.5 (7%)     max: 674 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MT6750T +
min: 2633     avg: 2680     median: 2680 (3%)     max: 2727 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1442     avg: 1459     median: 1443 (3%)     max: 1492 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 465     avg: 483.7     median: 482 (9%)     max: 504 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
0 MFLOPS (0%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
0 MFLOPS (0%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 12953     avg: 13718     median: 13618.5 (16%)     max: 14680 ms
min: 13903     avg: 14116     median: 13903 (16%)     max: 14543 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 1414     avg: 1471     median: 1415 (16%)     max: 1584 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 2773     avg: 2935     median: 2968.5 (3%)     max: 3028 Points
min: 3082     avg: 3193     median: 3192.5 (3%)     max: 3303 Points
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
20887 Points (21%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
28399 Points (10%)
42273 Points (14%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
100%
1 MT6750T +
min: 4611     avg: 5071     median: 5070.5 (16%)     max: 5530 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
100%
1 MT6750T +
min: 14787     avg: 15444     median: 15443.5 (19%)     max: 16100 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
100%
1 MT6750T +
min: 10956     avg: 11300     median: 11300 (4%)     max: 11644 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
100%
1 MT6750T +
min: 20579     avg: 21432     median: 21432 (13%)     max: 22285 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 MT6750T +
min: 51621     avg: 53246     median: 53246 (9%)     max: 54871 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 3803     avg: 4043     median: 4043 (20%)     max: 4283 Points
min: 4012     avg: 4583     median: 4583 (23%)     max: 5154 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 MT6750T +
min: 1602     avg: 1989     median: 1988.5 (11%)     max: 2375 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 MT6750T +
min: 4743     avg: 18971     median: 18971 (41%)     max: 33199 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 MT6750T +
min: 3042     avg: 3446     median: 3446 (23%)     max: 3850 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT6750T → 113% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 17. 13:07:06

#0 checking url part for id 6808 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10124 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.041s ... 0.042s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.042s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 6808 +0.003s ... 0.045s

#7 got single benchmarks 6808 +0.011s ... 0.056s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10124 +0.003s ... 0.059s

#9 got single benchmarks 10124 +0.011s ... 0.071s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.071s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.07s ... 0.14s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.142s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.044s ... 0.186s

#14 return log +0.057s ... 0.243s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)