, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core i3-330UM vs Intel Core i3-330M

Intel Core i3-330UM

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i3-330UM is a Ultra Low Voltage dual-core processor for small and light laptops. It is clocked with 1.2 GHz and does not feature Turbo Boost to overclock the CPU cores. Another feature missing compared to the i5 and i7 lineup is the AES function block. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). 

A feature of the new Core i3-330UM is the integrated graphics card (called Intel HD Graphics) and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process. The also called GMA HD is able to use Turbo Boost to overclock from 133 to 500 MHz.

Due to the integrated memory controller and HyperThreading, the  Core i3-330UM is faster than a similar clocked Core 2 Duo (1.2 GHz) in all (us known) applications and benchmarks. Therefore it should beat the 1.3 GHz Pentium SU7300. Still the gaming performance will suffer from the low clock speed.

The power consumption of 18 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 17 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo SL-series (CPU alone).

 

Intel Core i3-330M

► remove from comparison Intel 330M

The Intel Core i3-330M is a lower-middle class dual core CPU for laptops and clocks with 2.16 GHz. The difference to the Core i5-430M is the lacking Turbo Boost overclocking and the slower core speed. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). 

A feature of the new Core i3-330M is the integrated graphics card called Intel HD Graphics or GMA HD and a DDR3 1066 MHz memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process. 

The performance in synthetic benchmarks is mostly on par with a 2.4 GHz Core 2 Duo P8600 (due to the improved hyperthreading). The speed should be at least as fast as a 2.2 GHz Core 2 Duo and therefore the i3-330M positions itself in the middle class (lower middle class regarding Core i CPUs). It should handle all applications well, but some demanding games could profit from a faster CPU.

The 32nm cpu cores of the Westmere generation can also process some new instructions to accelerate AES encryptions. In the i3-330M Intel has deactivated these new AES functions.

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is known to be clocked up to 500 MHz and should be clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. The Core i5 and i7 models should still be a bit faster because of the higher max. clock speed of the GPU. A GeForce 9400M (ION) should still be a faster (especially as Nvidia and ATI cards have a better driver support than Intel up to now). According to rumors, the GMA core will also use the Turbo Mode regulate the clock speed.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone).

Intel Core i3-330UMIntel Core i3-330M
Intel Core i3Intel Core i3
ArrandaleArrandale
Series: Core i3 Arrandale
Intel Core i3-390M compare2.67 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-380M compare2.53 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-370M compare2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-350M compare2.26 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-330M2.13 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-380UM compare1.33 GHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i3-330UM1.2 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-390M compare2.67 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-380M compare2.53 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-370M compare2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-350M compare2.26 GHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i3-330M2.13 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-380UM compare1.33 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-330UM1.2 GHz2 / 43 MB
1200 MHz2130 MHz
25002500
512 KB512 KB
3 MB3 MB
2 / 42 / 4
18 35
382+177 177+382
32 32 0.775 - 1 V (low frequency mode) 0.8 - 1.4 V
81+114 mm281+114 mm2
105 °C90 (rPGA) -100 (BGA) °C
BGA1288BGA1288, PGA988
Intel HD Graphics 166-500MHz, DDR3-800 Memory Controller, Hyper-Threading, Virtualization Technology VT-x, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Fast Memory Access, Flex Memory Access, Execute Disable BitHyper Threading, Enhanced Speedstep, integrated GMA HD 500MHz, integrated DDR3 1066 memory controller
Architecturex86x86
Intel Core i3 330UMIntel Core i3 330M

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1 Points (2%)
179%
330M +
min: 1.71     avg: 1.7     median: 1.8 (3%)     max: 1.77 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1293     avg: 1297     median: 1297 (12%)     max: 1301
180%
330M +
min: 1671     avg: 2301     median: 2330 (21%)     max: 2360
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 2847     avg: 2982     median: 2982 (5%)     max: 3117
184%
330M +
min: 5361     avg: 5513     median: 5491 (9%)     max: 6333
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 3779     avg: 3796     median: 3796 (4%)     max: 3813 Points
173%
330M +
min: 6254     avg: 6557     median: 6552 (6%)     max: 6756 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 1629     avg: 1665     median: 1664.5 (12%)     max: 1700 Points
172%
330M +
min: 1932     avg: 2779     median: 2863 (20%)     max: 2931 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1310     avg: 1325     median: 1323.4 (16%)     max: 1340.98 s
108%
330M +
min: 477     avg: 853     median: 750 (9%)     max: 2356.66 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 42     avg: 42.6     median: 42.7 (9%)     max: 43.135 s
104%
330M +
min: 23     avg: 27.3     median: 23.9 (5%)     max: 63.96 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1299     avg: 1310     median: 1301 (7%)     max: 1331 Points
171%
330M +
min: 1906     avg: 2210     median: 2230 (12%)     max: 2280 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 35     avg: 36.1     median: 36.1 (8%)     max: 37.3 s
104%
330M +
min: 20     avg: 21     median: 21 (5%)     max: 24 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 79     avg: 81.7     median: 82.7 (4%)     max: 83.5 s
102%
330M +
min: 47     avg: 49.3     median: 48 (2%)     max: 69 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1843     avg: 1876     median: 1875.9 (8%)     max: 1908.77 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 14690     avg: 16150     median: 16150 (8%)     max: 17610 MIPS
161%
330M +
min: 25565     avg: 27250     median: 26000 (12%)     max: 31260 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 12400     avg: 12510     median: 12510 (10%)     max: 12620 MFLOPS
162%
330M +
min: 20210     avg: 20478     median: 20300 (16%)     max: 22700 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 330M +
min: 4624     avg: 5352     median: 5107 (32%)     max: 5958 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
min: 4.1     avg: 4.2     median: 4.2 (53%)     max: 4.2 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
3540 Points (4%)
174%
330M +
min: 5043     avg: 6073     median: 6143 (7%)     max: 6244 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-330UM → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-330M → 148% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 22. 14:00:55

#0 checking url part for id 997 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 537 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:09:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.009s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 997 +0s ... 0.009s

#7 got single benchmarks 997 +0.012s ... 0.021s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 537 +0s ... 0.021s

#9 got single benchmarks 537 +0.065s ... 0.086s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.086s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.099s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.103s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)