Notebookcheck Logo
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro tablet review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro review - An affordable tablet with fantastic staying power and a superb screen

A cheaper alternative to the Apple iPad Air.

In many areas, Xiaomi's Pad 7 Pro is better than an iPad Air 2024 but costs less than half the price. In particular, the Xiaomi Tab's 3K display is unrivaled in this price range. However, compared to the Xiaomi Pad 7, there is probably a catch with the Pro version.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Andrew Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇷🇺 ...
Android Touchscreen Tablet

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro verdict

In our review, the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro impressed us with a very favorable performance, feature and price ratio. It comes with a powerful Qualcomm processor, a PWM-free, high-resolution display, and an excellent speaker system that ensures the user enjoys great sound. The result is a mid-range tablet that is ideal for multimedia applications. Thanks to the extremely good battery life, as well as pen support and an optional keyboard case, nothing will stand in your way of getting some productive work done.

However, the Xiaomi tablet also leaves some question marks, especially concerning the update policy and global availability. Users who expect long-term software support should, therefore, opt for either a Galaxy Tab S9 or a Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE. In addition, the Pad 7 Pro is somewhat limited in terms of connectivity due to its lack of GNSS and 5G options, as well as the absence of 6 GHz Wi-Fi.

Pros

+ bright 144 Hz panel
+ premium looks
+ good battery life
+ high-level performance
+ powerful speakers

Cons

- (currently) can only be imported
- no 6 GHz band
- no update guarantee

Price and availability

The Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro is currently only available as an import in Germany. In China, the mid-range tablet costs 2,499 yuan (approx. $330) in the basic version. At our partner shop Trading Shenzhen, prices start at around $440. There are currently no further indications of a global launch, so the Pro version – similar to the Pad 6 series – will probably not make its way to Europe.

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
86.5%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $609.99
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Ai WiFi Ver...
2. $400.00
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version...
3. $41.99
Keyboard Case for Xiaomi Pad...
List Price: 450€
500 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash11.20"
3200x2136
344 PPI
IPS
2.
86.1%
OnePlus Pad 2
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon: $549.00
List Price: 549€
584 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.10"
3000x2120
304 PPI
IPS
3.
90% v7 (old)
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
Apple M2 ⎘
Apple M2 10-Core GPU ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe
Amazon: $729.89
List Price: 699€
462 g128 GB NVMe10.86"
2360x1640
265 PPI
IPS
4.
81.1%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W ⎘
HiSilicon Maleoon 910 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $5.47
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
2. $41.99
YOUULAR Tablet Case for Huaw...
3. $10.96
Kepuch 2 Pack Tempered Glass...
List Price: 399€
510 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash11.50"
2800x1840
291 PPI
TFT-LCD
5.
90.9% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 740 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
List Price: 1169€
500 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash11.00"
2560x1600
274 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2x

Along with the Xiaomi 15 and the Xiaomi 15 Pro, the Chinese manufacturer presented the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro as part of its China event. The mid-range tablet features a well-specced 11.2-inch display and a Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. Given the low price, the manufacturer has also made no compromises when it comes to optional accessories. A keyboard cover with illuminated keys and a stylus can also transform the Pad 7 Pro into a work machine for school or university.

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro specifications

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Pad 7 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 8 x 2 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
Display
11.20 inch 3:2, 3200 x 2136 pixel 344 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, native pen support, IPS, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 225 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB Type C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.18 x 251.22 x 173.42 ( = 0.24 x 9.89 x 6.83 in)
Battery
8850 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 1/2.76", 4K@60fps) + 2 MPix (f/2.4), camera2 API: Full
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.2, FF)
Additional features
Speakers: 4 Speaker, charger, USB cable, info material, HyperOS 2.0, 12 Months Warranty, widvine L1, BT-Codecs: SBC, AAC, LDAC, LHDC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG, fanless
Weight
500 g ( = 17.64 oz / 1.1 pounds), Power Supply: 93 g ( = 3.28 oz / 0.21 pounds)
Price
450 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case - The Xiaomi tablet has a metal chassis

The Pad 7 Pro's fit and finish are very good, and the aluminum frame and rear also have a high-quality feel. Thanks to the matte finish, fingerprints are not a problem, but the manufacturer hasn't specified which protective glass is used on the front.

With a weight of 500 grams and a case thickness of just under 6 millimeters, the Xiaomi tablet is easy to handle even when used for long periods. Despite its 11-inch frame, the Pad 7 Pro has quite compact dimensions. This is also made possible by its good screen-to-body ratio of around 86 percent. This results in quite slim screen bezels. The case does not come with IP certification.

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro colors (image source: Xiaomi)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro colors (image source: Xiaomi)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro tablet review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro tablet review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro tablet review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro tablet review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)

Size comparison

268.7 mm / 10.6 in 195 mm / 7.68 in 6.49 mm / 0.2555 in 584 g1.287 lbs261 mm / 10.3 in 177.3 mm / 6.98 in 6.2 mm / 0.2441 in 510 g1.124 lbs254.3 mm / 10 in 165.8 mm / 6.53 in 5.9 mm / 0.2323 in 500 g1.102 lbs251.22 mm / 9.89 in 173.42 mm / 6.83 in 6.18 mm / 0.2433 in 500 g1.102 lbs247.6 mm / 9.75 in 178.5 mm / 7.03 in 6.1 mm / 0.2402 in 462 g1.019 lbs210 mm / 8.27 in 148 mm / 5.83 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 2.9 g0.00639 lbs

Features - The Pad 7 Pro uses USB 3.2

The Xiaomi tablet comes with either 8 or 12 GB of LDDR5X RAM and 256 or 512 GB of UFS 4.0 storage. In addition, the Pad 7 Pro offers a strong feature set for a mid-range tablet with its quad speaker system, stylus support, Miracast and fingerprint sensor. In our tests, we also measured a very decent data transfer speed of up to 212 MB/s with a Samsung 980 Pro (M2 SSD hard drive) via the fast USB 3.2 port (Gen. 1). The connected storage media can be formatted using NTFS or exFAT. With the help of an adapter, the USB port can also be used to output image signals to external screens.

Software - The Xiaomi tab runs Android 15

The Pad 7 Pro uses the company's own second-generation HyperOS, which includes Play Protect certification. Our Chinese version does not support Google services out of the box, but the Google Frameworks are already preinstalled when delivered. This means that the PlayStore can be installed manually via the company's own app store. However, in addition to Chinese and English, no German language pack can be selected

Xiaomi is reluctant to provide information regarding software updates for the Chinese market. At the time of our review, the Xiaomi tablet had Android 15 and included security patches from December 2024. We would not assume more than two to three years of product support.

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro tablet review
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro tablet review
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro tablet review
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro tablet review

Sustainability

Xiaomi has not provided detailed information concerning the materials used and their recycling rate, but the manufacturer has provided general recycling information. The focus is on increasing the use of recycled materials, including aluminum, gold and copper. The use of organic-based high-polymer materials and recycled plastic from discarded fishing nets should also help keep the ecological footprint to a minimum.

The packaging appears to be plastic-free, but the device itself is wrapped in foil. The rest of the packaging is made of cardboard.

Communication and GNSS - A tablet lacking GPS

The Xiaomi tablet offers neither the option of using mobile data nor does it support location via satellite systems

Within a home network, the Pad 7 Pro uses the modern WiFi 7 standard, but only the 2.4 and 5 GHz range is used to establish a connection. In our test paired with the Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000, we achieved impressive transfer speeds of almost 1,000 Mbit/s without the 6 GHz band. However, we were unable to fully exploit WiFi 7 using our 6E reference router.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1015 (495min - 1037max) MBit/s +2%
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (556 - 1806, n=59)
1015 MBit/s +2%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
991 (512min - 1016max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Wi-Fi 6E
944 (474min - 970max) MBit/s -5%
Average of class Tablet
  (10.5 - 1693, n=93, last 2 years)
559 MBit/s -44%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (565 - 1875, n=59)
1014 MBit/s +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Wi-Fi 6E
951 (929min - 960max) MBit/s +6%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
895 (751min - 988max) MBit/s
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
876 (737min - 950max) MBit/s -2%
Average of class Tablet
  (20.1 - 1723, n=93, last 2 years)
583 MBit/s -35%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (563 - 1945, n=46)
1527 MBit/s
Average of class Tablet
  (578 - 1898, n=21, last 2 years)
1257 MBit/s
OnePlus Pad 2
Wi-Fi 7
895 (675min - 1017max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
666 (403min - 883max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
OnePlus Pad 2
Wi-Fi 7
1652 (1472min - 1703max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (451 - 1864, n=46)
1515 MBit/s
Average of class Tablet
  (746 - 1842, n=21, last 2 years)
1401 MBit/s
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1196 (767min - 1336max) MBit/s
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø974 (512-1016)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø929 (474-970)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø891 (751-988)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø951 (929-960)

Cameras - The Xiaomi tablet has a single camera

A selfie with the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
A selfie with the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro

Xiaomi has taken inspiration from its sister model, the Pad 6S Pro, when it comes to the Pad 7 Pro's camera system. The 32 MPix lens on the front uses pixel binning but only works with a fixed focus. The photo quality is still acceptable for this price range. Videos can be recorded using the front camera at 30fps in FullHD quality. On top of this, the mid-range tablet can produce moving images in 4K60.

The heart of the camera system is an autofocus 50 MPix lens and an aperture of f/1.8. In daylight, the Samsung JN1 produces good photos, and for a tablet under $500, they are of excellent quality. However, the color reproduction sometimes seems a bit oversaturated. The quality offered by the Pad 7 Pro is very suitable for taking photos of documents for adding notes at a later date. With the corresponding mode, the recognized document area is also automatically cropped and saved.

1x
1x
2x
2x
5x
5x
10x (max)
10x (max)
Document mode
Document mode
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro tablet review
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro tablet review
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro tablet review
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro tablet review

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angleWide-angleLow-lightZoom 5x
ColorChecker
4.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
8 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
2 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
8 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro: 6 ∆E min: 1.96 - max: 11.66 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
54.6 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
61.9 ∆E
53.3 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
76.1 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
41.5 ∆E
92 ∆E
70.6 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro: 46.69 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 92 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - The Pad 7 Pro comes with a power adapter

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro's power adapter (image source: Marcus Herbrich)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro's power adapter (image source: Marcus Herbrich)

The box contents include a 67-watt quick-charge power adapter, a data or charging cable (USB-A to USB-C) and a quick guide. Trading Shenzhen expands on the extras included with the Chinese version by adding an EU adapter for the charger and a USB OTG adapter. An optional stylus and a keyboard cover are also available for the Pad 7 Pro. 

Our import device comes with a 12-month warranty. In the event of a warranty claim, Trading Shenzhen offers the option of sending the smartphone to a German shipping address.

Input devices and operation - The Xiaomi tablet and 360 Hz

The device can be operated with both your fingers and the 15-gram Xiaomi Focus Pen, which has 8,192 pressure sensitivity levels. Thanks to the high refresh rate of up to 144 Hz, the display is buttery smooth despite the 3K resolution and inputs are implemented without delay with a sampling rate of 360 Hz. However, we were still able to coax the odd micro-stutter from our review device.

A fingerprint sensor is located in the on/off button and can be found on the left-hand side of the tablet. The sensor area is very easy to reach with your index finger. Unlocking works quickly and reliably, and 2D facial recognition via the front camera is also possible.

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro tablet review
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro tablet review
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro tablet review

Display - The Pad 7 Pro uses LCD

The LC display relies on a classic RGB sub-pixel matrix consisting of a red, a blue and a green light diode.
The LC display relies on a classic RGB sub-pixel matrix consisting of a red, a blue and a green light diode.

The IPS panel has a 3:2 aspect ratio and a high pixel density of 345 PPI - very appealing brightness for a tablet. We also achieved the manufacturer's specification of 800 nits in our measurements using a white background. The peak brightness in the APL18 test was 780 cd/m², while the maximum brightness achieved when viewing an HDR video was only 522 cd/m². A triple certification by TÜV Rheinland (flicker-free, low blue light content, "circadian-friendly") is also available.

Thanks to the LC technology, we were unable to detect any flickering, even at low brightness, and this is something that should appeal to PMW-sensitive users.

749
cd/m²
799
cd/m²
756
cd/m²
739
cd/m²
776
cd/m²
725
cd/m²
742
cd/m²
724
cd/m²
744
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 799 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 750.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.48 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 776 cd/m²
Contrast: 1338:1 (Black: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.6 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.83}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
CCT: 6892 K
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
IPS, 3200x2136, 11.2"
OnePlus Pad 2
IPS, 3000x2120, 12.1"
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9"
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
TFT-LCD, 2800x1840, 11.5"
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2560x1600, 11"
Screen
5%
-1%
-66%
-15%
Brightness middle
776
833
7%
506
-35%
511
-34%
576
-26%
Brightness
750
771
3%
474
-37%
449
-40%
579
-23%
Brightness Distribution
91
84
-8%
87
-4%
83
-9%
99
9%
Black Level *
0.58
0.45
22%
0.4
31%
0.99
-71%
Contrast
1338
1851
38%
1265
-5%
516
-61%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.6
1.79
-12%
1.48
7%
3.6
-125%
2.5
-56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.5
4.01
11%
3.12
31%
7.5
-67%
4.6
-2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.5
3
-20%
2.3
8%
5.5
-120%
2.3
8%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.254 98%
2.204 100%
2.27 97%
2.02 109%
CCT
6892 94%
6419 101%
6954 93%
7566 86%
6585 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8327 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

The contrast ratio sits at a decent level of around 1,500:1, and the colors are also very well calibrated in the "Pro" profile. Differences in the individual colors are hardly noticeable. The setting options for color representation are also extensive. In addition to various color profiles, the color temperature and color space can also be adjusted.

Color accuracy (profile: Professional, Warm, target color space: sRGB)
Color accuracy (profile: Professional, Warm, target color space: sRGB)
Farbraum (profile: Professional, Warm, target color space: sRGB)
Farbraum (profile: Professional, Warm, target color space: sRGB)
Gray scales (profile: Professional, Warm, target color space: sRGB)
Gray scales (profile: Professional, Warm, target color space: sRGB)
Color saturation (profile: Professional, Warm, target color space: sRGB)
Color saturation (profile: Professional, Warm, target color space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
18.37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.82 ms rise
↘ 13.55 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.32 ms rise
↘ 24.81 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).

Thanks to its relatively high brightness, the mid-range tablet is very easy to use outdoors. In the shade, however, the Pad 7 Pro's display should be legible without any major restrictions, even in summer conditions. The viewing angles of the IPS panel are appealing.

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro tablet review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro tablet review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro tablet review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro tablet review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)

Performance - The Xiaomi tablet relies on Qualcomm

In our series of benchmark tests, the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 installed in the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro operates together with 12 GB of RAM and achieves high performance levels for a mid-range tablet. Compared to a Galaxy Tab S9, however, the recorded scores are somewhat lower. In the graphics tests, the Adreno 735 also achieves good scores; however, in the demanding GFXBench tier tests, it goes about its work with the handbrake on.

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
2587 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
2079 Points +5%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1973 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (1821 - 2012, n=7)
1924 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=96, last 2 years)
1281 Points -35%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
1245 Points -37%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
954 Points -52%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
10085 Points +97%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
5503 Points +7%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
5127 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (4602 - 5284, n=7)
4938 Points -4%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
4564 Points -11%
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=96, last 2 years)
4083 Points -20%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
3989 Points -22%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
1887 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1550 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (1329 - 1498, n=7)
1431 Points +2%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1403 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
965 Points -31%
Average of class Tablet
  (103 - 2286, n=78, last 2 years)
858 Points -39%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
8624 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
5036 Points +9%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4602 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (3980 - 4746, n=7)
4359 Points -5%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
3694 Points -20%
Average of class Tablet
  (303 - 10522, n=78, last 2 years)
3208 Points -30%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (15547 - 19083, n=7)
16859 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
16172 Points +3%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
15743 Points
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12156 Points -23%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
11872 Points -25%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 25683, n=84, last 2 years)
11155 Points -29%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
1437 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1222 Points +9%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1123 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (771 - 1155, n=7)
984 Points -12%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
911 Points -19%
Average of class Tablet
  (172 - 2155, n=67, last 2 years)
857 Points -24%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8895 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
8673 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (5685 - 9147, n=7)
7903 Points -11%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
6401 Points -28%
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 12211, n=67, last 2 years)
5075 Points -43%
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
Points -100%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
14097 Points +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (9875 - 13391, n=7)
11865 Points +19%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
10447 Points +5%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
9937 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 16435, n=67, last 2 years)
8179 Points -18%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
12938 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
8702 Points -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (5456 - 12938, n=7)
8566 Points -34%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
8362 Points -35%
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 17036, n=67, last 2 years)
5878 Points -55%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
31626 Points +28%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
24738 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (8020 - 29006, n=7)
23198 Points -6%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
12763 Points -48%
Average of class Tablet
  (418 - 57192, n=67, last 2 years)
12644 Points -49%
Web
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1928 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (1534 - 1928, n=7)
1770 Points -8%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
1532 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1460 Points -24%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2273, n=67, last 2 years)
1395 Points -28%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
16088 Points +9%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
14738 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (13576 - 15572, n=6)
14570 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 74821, n=66, last 2 years)
12985 Points -12%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
10847 Points -26%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet
  (138 - 156427, n=59, last 2 years)
7310 Points +513%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1308 Points +10%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1192 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (946 - 1321, n=7)
1165 Points -2%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
738 Points -38%
Geekbench AI
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Tablet
  (130 - 4532, n=15, last 2 years)
1159 Points +7%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1082 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (n=1)
1082 Points 0%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Tablet
  (84 - 4545, n=15, last 2 years)
854 Points +83%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
466 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (n=1)
466 Points 0%
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
473 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (n=1)
473 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (85 - 1140, n=15, last 2 years)
417 Points -12%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Tablet
  (66.1 - 8305, n=8, last 2 years)
1709 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (115 - 194, n=3)
143 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
101 Points
Score V6
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
3686 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (n=1)
3686 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (70.4 - 12784, n=15, last 2 years)
3056 Points -17%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
6204 Points +89%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4454 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3826 Points +17%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3283 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1018 Points -69%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
5598 Points +75%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4485 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3857 Points +20%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3201 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
994 Points -69%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
23565 Points +95%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14527 Points +20%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12074 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3802 Points -69%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8315 Points +60%
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
6654 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5627 Points +8%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5212 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8321 Points +61%
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
7899 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5550 Points +7%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5182 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1626 Points +51%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1075 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1639 Points +49%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1098 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
628 fps +40%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
449 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
367 fps -18%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
256 fps -43%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +10%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -45%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -49%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
411 fps +54%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
267 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
249 fps -7%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
155 fps -42%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
97 fps +67%
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +3%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -31%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
281 fps +54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
186 fps +2%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
183 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
106 fps -42%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps +83%
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +71%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -37%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
173 fps +59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +10%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps -56%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
62 fps +107%
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +100%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +40%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
30 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -47%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps +30%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 fps +30%
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
68 fps +28%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -57%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
95 fps +107%
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +30%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps +9%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps -39%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
208 fps +43%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
170 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
168 fps +16%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
145 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps -56%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
36.7 fps +53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32 fps +33%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps +33%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10 fps -58%
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPad Air 11 2024 (Safari 17)
256.985 Points +32%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
195.343 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (59.7 - 235, n=7)
160.1 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G (chrome 117)
152.9 Points -22%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 393, n=74, last 2 years)
131.3 Points -33%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
89.474 Points -54%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPad Air 11 2024 (Safari 17)
29.9 runs/min +143%
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 34.4, n=48, last 2 years)
13.8 runs/min +12%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
12.3 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (3.54 - 13.6, n=7)
10.1 runs/min -18%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
3.11 runs/min -75%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
243 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G (chrome 117)
179 Points +15%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
155 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (61 - 185, n=7)
146.3 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=75, last 2 years)
121.5 Points -22%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
85 Points -45%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 11 2024 (Safari 17)
77756 Points +18%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
65712 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G (Edge 117)
49582 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (28536 - 66369, n=7)
48215 Points -27%
OnePlus Pad 2 (Chrome 128)
45083 Points -31%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=101, last 2 years)
36364 Points -45%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
32134 Points -51%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=84, last 2 years)
3193 ms * -388%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G (chrome 117)
1532.5 ms * -134%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
1243.7 ms * -90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (603 - 1456, n=7)
874 ms * -34%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
654.56 ms *
Apple iPad Air 11 2024 (Safari 17)
442.8 ms * +32%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Pad 7 ProOnePlus Pad 2Huawei MatePad 11.5 SSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-29%
-16%
-13%
7%
-49%
Sequential Read 256KB
3849.52
2003.1
-48%
1837.4
-52%
3355.97
-13%
Sequential Write 256KB
3283.91
1732.7
-47%
1134.93
-65%
2188.2
-33%
2739 ?(555 - 3484, n=40)
-17%
Random Read 4KB
302.34
236.5
-22%
334.71
11%
451.18
49%
Random Write 4KB
346.85
348.6
1%
498.29
44%
160.96
-54%

Emissions

Temperature

The case doesn't really get that hot, but the measured surface temperatures are heterogeneous, with the Pad 7 Pro exceeding the 42-degree mark in one hotspot area. We used 3DMark to check the heat dissipation behavior inside the case. The Wild Life stress tests ended their run with a high consistency of around 90 percent and higher.

Max. Load
 33.9 °C
93 F
42.2 °C
108 F
42.6 °C
109 F
 
 29.5 °C
85 F
32.5 °C
91 F
32.3 °C
90 F
 
 31 °C
88 F
31.1 °C
88 F
32.3 °C
90 F
 
Maximum: 42.6 °C = 109 F
Average: 34.2 °C = 94 F
39.8 °C
104 F
40.7 °C
105 F
36.8 °C
98 F
31.7 °C
89 F
33 °C
91 F
30.9 °C
88 F
30.3 °C
87 F
31.4 °C
89 F
29.2 °C
85 F
Maximum: 40.7 °C = 105 F
Average: 33.8 °C = 93 F
Power Supply (max.)  29.1 °C = 84 F | Room Temperature 21.4 °C = 71 F | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
100 % +13%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 % +12%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.7 %
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 % -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71.6 % -19%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % +10%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89.8 %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84.9 % -5%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83.8 % -7%
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
65.3 % -27%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
95.7 %
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
87.3 % -9%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86.9 % -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79.8 % -17%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
97.1 %
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86.5 % -11%
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18 (17.6-19.6)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø24.1 (22.9-27.4)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø65 (63.4-71.5)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø78.9 (74-96)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø16.4 (16.2-16.9)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø23.2 (22.2-25.5)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø7.81 (7.7-7.93)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø11.1 (10.6-12.3)

Speakers

The Pad 7 Pro has four speakers as well as support for Dolby Atmos. For this price range, the sound quality is very good, with a lot of depth and a touch of bass. The pink noise has a linear frequency response for the mids, while the highs break down a bit. If you wish to achieve external sound output, you can use the USB port with a cable or wirelessly via Bluetooth 5.4.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203340.22527.530.33122.831.64026.331.85036.440.96321.130.78020.738.510019.643.812512.650.816016.359.720016.359.125013.163.231512.4654001063.250010.869.263012.473.880011.976.1100011.678.4125012.480.8160011.679.8200011.378.6250011.977.8315012.175.6400013.175.6500013.174.6630013.778.8800013.379.81000013.674.41250013.765.81600014.269.8SPL24.689.5N0.683.7median 12.6median 74.6Delta1.17.638.136.428.730.423.128.626.535.137.63419.626.116.721.324.231.520.44420.54911.651.910.753.410.356.67.852.38.1499.257.79.552.69.653.88.160.49.3649.765.910.259.810.96111.460.312.355.112.856.213.953.214.66015.459.516.259.623.672.40.529.1median 10.9median 56.22.64.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Pad 7 ProApple iPad Air 11 2024
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad Air 11 2024 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery runtimes - The Xiaomi tablet charges quickly

The Xiaomi tablet possesses an 8,850 mAh battery that can be rapidly charged at a speed of up to 67 watts. With the included power adapter, the battery is charged to its capacity again after 80 minutes. The Pad 7 Pro's power consumption is quite efficient, especially when compared directly to the MatePad 11.5 S

Power consumption

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.06 / 0.16 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.75 / 1.5 / 1.56 Watt
Load midlight 7.92 / 16.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
8850 mAh
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
 mAh
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
8800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
8400 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
 
Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
-100%
-124%
-92%
-28%
-89%
Idle Minimum *
0.75
1.5
-100%
1.53
-104%
2.58
-244%
1.267 ?(0.7 - 3.6, n=7)
-69%
Idle Average *
1.5
3.6
-140%
5.96
-297%
3.24
-116%
2.17 ?(1.09 - 6.52, n=7)
-45%
Idle Maximum *
1.56
4.6
-195%
6.07
-289%
3.39
-117%
Load Average *
7.92
12.8
-62%
6.87
13%
7.02
11%
8.41 ?(6.5 - 10.6, n=7)
-6%
Load Maximum *
16.5
16.8
-2%
6.88
58%
15.86
4%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.02 (1.025-12.7)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.87 (3.26-15.7)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.781 (0.697-1.46)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.31 (3.25-3.39)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.9 (11.3-12.5)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.3 (9.05-14.4)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.781 (0.697-1.46)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.31 (3.25-3.39)

Battery life

At 17.5 hours, the runtimes in our everyday Wi-Fi test using an adapted display brightness of 150 cd/m² are very good for an 11-inch tablet.

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome132)
17h 34min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
8850 mAh
1054 min
OnePlus Pad 2
9510 mAh
866 min
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
 mAh
683 min
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
8800 mAh
831 min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
8400 mAh
539 min

Notebookcheck overall rating

There are many reasons to purchase the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro, but the import restrictions have to be taken into account.

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro - 02/07/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
85 / 98 → 87%
Keyboard
70 / 80 → 88%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
59 / 69 → 86%
Weight
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Battery
91%
Display
84%
Games Performance
44 / 65 → 67%
Application Performance
71 / 92 → 77%
AI Performance
32%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
84 / 91 → 93%
Camera
60 / 90 → 66%
Average
65%
87%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
40%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
97.3%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
44.5%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 45.3%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Read all 3 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro review - An affordable tablet with fantastic staying power and a superb screen
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-02-11 (Update: 2025-02-21)