Doogee T6 Pro
Specifications
Pricecompare
Average of 2 scores (from 4 reviews)
Reviews for the Doogee T6 Pro
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/23/2016
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 70% mobility: 100% workmanship: 70%
Source: Móviles chinos libres ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 60%
Source: Kustruki ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Long battery life; high performance; nice cameras; good price. Negative: Heavy and bulky.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/15/2018
Source: Noticias 3D ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Decent hardware; good price; long battery life; quick charge.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/23/2016
Comment
ARM Mali-T720: Integrated graphics card in ARM based SoCs. Can be configured with up to 8 cores (T720 MP8) and 650 MHz core clock (at 28nm). Supports OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11 FL9_3, and Renderscript.
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
MT6753: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.50":
It is a very small display format for smartphones. You should by no means be mis-sighted and you will generally see very little on the screen and only have a small resolution available. In return, the device should be very small and handy.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.Doogee:
Doogee Mobile Limited Company is a small Chinese manufacturer that produces smartphones under the Doogee brand. The brand is one of the oldest among the classic Chinese cell phones and has existed since 2013. Doogee itself claims to have been founded in Spain, but this is just a marketing trick. Doogee is known for its rugged and outdoor-ready smartphones.
73.5%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.