, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Atom Z3745 vs Intel Atom Z3735D

Intel Atom Z3745

► remove from comparison Intel Z3745

The Intel Atom Z3745 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android tablets. It is clocked at 1.33 - 1.86 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. Compared to the Z3740, the Z3745 is based on the new C0 stepping and offers a slightly increased GPU clock rate.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and the improved performance per clock, the Z3745 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the Z2760. Depending on the benchmark, the Z3745 competes with Temash and Kabini APUs like the AMD A6-1450 and A4-5000. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 778 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding Windows games like World of Warcraft or Fifa will run fluently. However, video acceleration and display resolutions up to 2560 x 1600 pixels are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3735D

► remove from comparison Intel Z3735D

The Intel Atom Z3735D is a power-efficient quad-core SoC for tablets (mainly Android). It is clocked at 1.33 - 1.83 GHz and is part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22nm low-power design process (P1271) with Tri-Gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. In contrast to the Z3745D, the Z3735D offers a somewhat lower GPU clock rate.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, and enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major additions are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and the improved performance per clock, the Z3735D is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms like the Z2760. Depending on the benchmark, the Z3735D competes with AMDs Temash and Kabini APUs like the A6-1450 and A4-5000. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games. Compared to ARM SoCs for Android systems, the Z3735D is placed in the upper mid-range segment.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 646 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games (like simple Android titles) will run fluently. However, video acceleration and other multimedia applications are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2.2 W, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 W. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3745Intel Atom Z3735D
Intel AtomIntel Atom
Bay Trail-TBay Trail-T
Series: Atom Bay Trail-T
Intel Atom Z3795 compare1.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3785 compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775 compare1.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775D compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770 compare1.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770D compare1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736F compare1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736G compare1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Atom Z37451.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740 compare1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735E compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735F compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735G compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3680 compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z3680D compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z3795 compare1.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3785 compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775 compare1.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775D compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770 compare1.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770D compare1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736F compare1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736G compare1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37451.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740 compare1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Atom Z3735D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735E compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735F compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735G compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3680 compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z3680D compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
1330 - 1860 MHz1330 - 1830 MHz
224 KB224 KB
2 MB2 MB
4 / 44 / 4
<4 <4
22 22
UTFCBGA1380UTFCBGA1380
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 311 - 778 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 4 GB Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1067Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 646 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 2 GB Single-Channel DDR3L-RS 1333, Quick Sync
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (311 - 778 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (311 - 646 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$32 U.S.
Intel Atom Z3745Intel Atom Z3735D

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 929     avg: 948     median: 941 (8%)     max: 973
min: 744     avg: 851     median: 851 (8%)     max: 958
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 2491     avg: 3038     median: 3229 (5%)     max: 3393
min: 2514     avg: 2726     median: 2726 (4%)     max: 2938
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 Z3735D +
1165 s (14%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 Z3735D +
37.2 s (7%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 Z3735D +
1669 (11%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 Z3735D +
6.8 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 Z3735D +
35.1 fps (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 Z3735D +
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 Z3735D +
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 Z3735D +
0.6 GB/s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 Z3735D +
92 s (20%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 Z3735D +
176 s (8%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 Z3735D +
3458 s (15%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1005     avg: 1183     median: 1261 (5%)     max: 1284 Points
min: 1199     avg: 1202     median: 1202 (4%)     max: 1205 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 14743     avg: 14957     median: 14945 (10%)     max: 15195 Points
min: 13200     avg: 13403     median: 13403 (9%)     max: 13606 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 Z3745 +
min: 14732     avg: 15505     median: 15528 (16%)     max: 16016 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1186     avg: 1234     median: 1255 (3%)     max: 1261 Points
min: 1041     avg: 1055     median: 1055 (3%)     max: 1069 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 Z3745 +
1783 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 1715     avg: 1772     median: 1772 (14%)     max: 1829 Points
2303 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 1590     avg: 1660     median: 1660 (15%)     max: 1730 Points
2014 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 2321     avg: 2724     median: 2723.5 (5%)     max: 3126 Points
2247 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 1457     avg: 1759     median: 1759 (4%)     max: 2061 Points
2620 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 1811     avg: 2078     median: 2077.5 (5%)     max: 2344 Points
2336 Points (6%)
min: 2138     avg: 2168     median: 2167.5 (4%)     max: 2197
min: 782     avg: 783     median: 782.5 (16%)     max: 783
min: 8844.3     avg: 9011     median: 9010.7 (15%)     max: 9177.1 ms
min: 489.3     avg: 490     median: 490.4 (5%)     max: 491.4 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 Z3745 +
min: 620.5     avg: 667     median: 666.5 (6%)     max: 712.5 ms
min: 3479     avg: 3509     median: 3509 (5%)     max: 3539 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
100%
1 Z3745 +
min: 2774     avg: 2964     median: 3011.5 (40%)     max: 3108 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 Z3745 +
min: 17491     avg: 18396     median: 18279 (42%)     max: 19418 points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
100%
1 Z3745 +
min: 31690     avg: 33031     median: 32811.5 (76%)     max: 34810 Points
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
100%
1 Z3745 +
min: 33318     avg: 34946     median: 33635 (34%)     max: 37656 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 Z3745 +
34692 Points (12%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 Z3745 +
min: 875     avg: 958     median: 982 (30%)     max: 992 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 Z3745 +
min: 14914     avg: 16893     median: 17437.5 (57%)     max: 17784 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
100%
1 Z3745 +
min: 20763     avg: 26176     median: 27592 (4%)     max: 28757 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 Z3745 +
4298 Points (22%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z3745 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z3735D → 100% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 23. 12:05:04

#0 checking url part for id 5933 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5964 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:09:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.014s ... 0.015s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.015s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 5933 +0s ... 0.015s

#7 got single benchmarks 5933 +0.021s ... 0.036s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 5964 +0s ... 0.037s

#9 got single benchmarks 5964 +0.008s ... 0.044s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.044s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.026s ... 0.071s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.074s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)