Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 920 vs Qualcomm Adreno 710

Samsung Xclipse 920

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 920

The Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU is an integrated graphics card in the Samsung Exynos 2200 SoC that is used in Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in some models of the Galaxy S21 line. The iGPU is the first that uses an architecture by AMD (RDNA 2, like the Radeon 660M in the Ryzen 6000 chips). Current information from Geekbench ML points to 3 CUs (=192 shaders).

The performance is slightly below current high end iGPUs for phones like the Adreno 730 (Snapdrageon 8 Gen 1) or Apple A15 GPU, but still sufficient for all mobile games in 2022.

The Xclipse 920 is produced in the modern 4nm EUV process at Samsung (as its integrated in the Exynos 2200).

Qualcomm Adreno 710

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 710

The Adreno 710 is a graphics unit for smartphones and tablets, which was first installed in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2. The chip has been available since the end of 2023 and is primarily used in Android-based upper mid-range devices.

HDR gaming with 10-bit color depth is possible with the graphics chip, which supports the APIs OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP and Vulkan 1.13.

The GPU is able to control FHD+ displays with up to 144 Hz and offers support for HDR10 and HDR vivid.

Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 710
Adreno 700 Series
Xclipse 950 compare 8
Xclipse 940 compare
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Adreno 750 compare
Adreno 740 compare
Adreno 735 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732 compare
Adreno 730 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
CodenameRDNA 2
ArchitectureRDNA 2
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed555 (Boost) MHz800 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
technology4 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement18.01.2022 30.11.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagesemiconductor.samsung.com
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
CPU in Xclipse 920GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 22008 x 1820 MHz? MHz555 MHz
CPU in Adreno 710GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 28 x 1950 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 38 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 10206     avg: 10662     median: 10610 (46%)     max: 11221 Points
5762 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 17842     avg: 19764     median: 18631.5 (41%)     max: 23949 Points
6231 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 8268     avg: 8617     median: 8547.5 (36%)     max: 9105 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 11774     avg: 12830     median: 12432.5 (31%)     max: 14680 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
0 Points (0%)
min: 4087     avg: 4575     median: 4720.5 (23%)     max: 4773 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min:      avg: 0 (0%)     max: 0 Points
min: 3967     avg: 4639     median: 4845 (16%)     max: 4899 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 6440     avg: 7269     median: 7373 (4%)     max: 7890 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1702     avg: 1852     median: 1885.5 (2%)     max: 1935 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
12 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 28     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (5%)     max: 31 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 60     avg: 68     median: 67.5 (5%)     max: 77 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 63     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (6%)     max: 72 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 101     avg: 120.3     median: 125 (3%)     max: 130 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 135     avg: 182.3     median: 190 (8%)     max: 214 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 920
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 218     avg: 285.5     median: 302 (2%)     max: 320 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 710
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 306511     avg: 328113     median: 319781 (32%)     max: 366379 Points
min: 0     avg: 70941     median: 70940.5 (7%)     max: 141881 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
402385 Points (32%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
136.6 fps (3%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
38.5 fps (7%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
8042 Points (2%)
min: 1323     avg: 1513     median: 1334 (0%)     max: 2243 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
8695 Points (2%)
min: 1637     avg: 2122     median: 1671.5 (0%)     max: 3509 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 20418     avg: 26631     median: 27556.5 (9%)     max: 30991 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 24021     avg: 26637     median: 26957 (45%)     max: 28612 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 8.3     avg: 9.8     median: 9.2 (4%)     max: 12.6 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 920 → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 710 → 39% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 710:
29.9 29.9 30 30 59.2 ~ 36 fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 710:
29.6 29.8 29.9 30 44.6 ~ 33 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
59.5  fps
76%
Adreno 710:
28.8 43 43.8 47 47.1 49 59 ~ 45 fps
med.
100%
Xclipse 920:
59.3  fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 920:
58.2  fps
60%
Adreno 710:
24 29.3 30 31 39 44 46.6 ~ 35 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 103 ~ 67 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 58.3 ~ 44 fps
130%
Adreno 710:
39 58.6 58.8 59.3 59.6 60 60 60 ~ 57 fps
med.
100%
Xclipse 920:
39.5  fps
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 30 30 39.8 ~ 32 fps
156%
Adreno 710:
30 39.7 40 58.8 59 59.6 60 ~ 50 fps
ultra
Adreno 710:
39 39.7 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 710:
60 60 115 ~ 78 fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 920 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 710 → 105%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 105%

Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 710
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal3633
Genshin Impact59.559.358.24535
PUBG Mobile4439.532575040
Dead Trigger 278
Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 710
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2


2


1


1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3





1
1

3







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 12. 08:55:58

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11147 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12307 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752303358s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 10 Jul 2025 05:20:53 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.032s ... 0.033s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.033s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.033s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11147 +0.015s ... 0.048s

#9 got single benchmarks 11147 +0.005s ... 0.053s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12307 +0s ... 0.053s

#11 got single benchmarks 12307 +0.012s ... 0.065s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.065s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.069s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.07s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.07s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.07s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.071s

#18 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.084s

#19 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.084s

#20 Got 59 rows for game benchmarks. +0.007s ... 0.091s

#21 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.091s

#22 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.091s

#23 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.094s

#24 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.094s

#25 return log +0s ... 0.094s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)