Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 530 vs Samsung Xclipse 540

Samsung Xclipse 530

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 530

The Samsung Xclipse 530 GPU is a graphics card (iGPU) integrated in the Samsung Exynos 1480 SoC. Samsung does not publish any details about the graphics unit, but it is probably based on the AMD RDNA 2 architecture like the older Xclipse 920 and not yet the current RDNA 3 architecture of the Xclipse 940. The performance is in the midfield of smartphone GPUs and comparable to an ARM Mali-G610 MP4.

The Exynos 1480 and therefore also the Xclipse 530 GPU is manufactured by Samsung using the 4 nm process (Samsung 4LPP).

Samsung Xclipse 540

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 540

The Samsung Xclipse 540 GPU is a GPU integrated in the Samsung Exynos 1580 SoC integrated graphics card (iGPU). Samsung does not publish any details about the graphics unit, but it is probably based on the AMD RDNA 2 architecture like the older Xclipse 920 and not yet the current RDNA 3 architecture of the Xclipse 940. The GPU integrates 2 WGPs (4 CUs) and is said to be 37% faster with 20% less power consumption (probably compared to the Xclipse 530). In our benchmarks, the Xclipse 540 is even slightly faster (41%) and is on a par with the older Adreno 660 (Snapdragon 868).

The Exynos 1580 and therefore also the Xclipse 540 GPU is manufactured by Samsung using the 4 nm process (Samsung 4LPP).

show full text
Samsung Xclipse 530Samsung Xclipse 540
Xclipse 500 Series
Xclipse 540 @ 1.3 GHz
Xclipse 530 @ 1.3 GHz
Xclipse 540 @ 1.3 GHz
Xclipse 530 @ 1.3 GHz
Core Speed1300 (Boost) MHz1300 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memorynono
technology4 nm4 nm
Date of Announcement28.03.2024 28.03.2024
CPU in Xclipse 530GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 14808 x 2050 MHz? MHz1300 MHz
CPU in Xclipse 540GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 15808 x 1950 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
6828 Points (29%)
8224 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
7170 Points (18%)
9540 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
3992 Points (2%)
min: 4975     avg: 5132     median: 5184 (3%)     max: 5237 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
915 Points (1%)
min: 1362     avg: 1418     median: 1404 (2%)     max: 1488 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
7.9 fps (3%)
min: 9.7     avg: 10.5     median: 9.9 (4%)     max: 12 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
19 fps (3%)
min: 22     avg: 23.7     median: 23 (4%)     max: 26 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
49 fps (4%)
min: 53     avg: 58     median: 56 (4%)     max: 65 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
36 fps (3%)
min: 46     avg: 47     median: 47 (4%)     max: 48 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
67 fps (1%)
min: 81     avg: 83.7     median: 85 (2%)     max: 85 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
95 fps (4%)
min: 109     avg: 110.7     median: 111 (5%)     max: 112 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 530
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
134 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 540
min: 153     avg: 155     median: 156 (1%)     max: 156 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
186154 Points (19%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
168067 Points (13%)
min: 255258     avg: 257707     median: 257707 (21%)     max: 260156 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
59.6 fps (1%)
77.5 fps (2%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
3083 Points (1%)
min: 6476     avg: 6660     median: 6659.5 (2%)     max: 6843 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
4041 Points (1%)
min: 6711     avg: 6783     median: 6783 (2%)     max: 6855 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
5.2 Watt (2%)
min: 6.04     avg: 7.1     median: 7.3 (3%)     max: 7.88 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 530 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 540 → 137% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 530:
55.5  fps
105%
Xclipse 540:
57 58.9 ~ 58 fps
med.
100%
Xclipse 530:
46.1  fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 530:
42.4  fps
123%
Xclipse 540:
47.3 57.5 ~ 52 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 530:
57.3  fps
77%
Xclipse 540:
29.7 58.9 ~ 44 fps
high
100%
Xclipse 530:
39.9  fps
88%
Xclipse 540:
29.6 39.8 ~ 35 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Xclipse 530:
117.6  fps
101%
Xclipse 540:
118.6  fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 530 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 540 → 99%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 98%

Samsung Xclipse 530Samsung Xclipse 540
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact55.546.142.45852
PUBG Mobile57.339.94435
Dead Trigger 2117.6118.6
Samsung Xclipse 530Samsung Xclipse 540
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2


1


1
1

1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2





1
1

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 12. 15:24:09

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12488 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13068 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752326649s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 10 Jul 2025 05:20:53 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.021s ... 0.021s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.021s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.021s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12488 +0.017s ... 0.038s

#9 got single benchmarks 12488 +0.005s ... 0.043s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 13068 +0s ... 0.043s

#11 got single benchmarks 13068 +0.005s ... 0.048s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.048s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.061s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.061s

#15 Got 15 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.065s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.065s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.066s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.067s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.067s

#20 return log +0.001s ... 0.068s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)