Ulefone Tiger
Specifications
Ulefone Tiger
Processor
Mediatek MT6737 4 x 1.3 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
Memory
2048 MB
Display
5.50 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 267 PPI, Capacitive, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB
Connections
Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD, up to 128GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Hall Effect Sensor, Gravity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Touch Sensor, OTG, USB 2.0 type-C
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM, WCDMA, FDD-LTE, Dual SIM, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.35 x 155.8 x 77.8 ( = 0.37 x 6.13 x 3.06 in)
Battery
4200 mAh Lithium-Polymer, SONY, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 550 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 480 h
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix Sony IMX219 (Interpolated to 13MP, Dual Flash
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Keyboard: Virtual
Weight
155 g ( = 5.47 oz / 0.34 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
100 Euro
Price comparison
Average Score:
Average of 3 scores (from 6 reviews)
Average of 3 scores (from 6 reviews)
price: 85%, performance: 73%, features: 75%, display: 75% mobility: 90%, workmanship: 78%, ergonomy: 70%, emissions: - %
Reviews for the Ulefone Tiger
Elephone C1 vs Ulefone Tiger Design, Hardware, Features, Battery Review
Source: Igeekphone
Archive.org version
Now coming to the last and the best part the prices of these phones, Elephone is priced $100 and the Ulefone Tiger is priced for $110, both are very capable gorgeous looking phones, but if you want a long lasting battery then Ulefone Tiger is the choice. But if you want to spare some amount and are tight on budget then Elephone C1 is a good pick.
Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/01/2016
Source: Igeekphone
Archive.org versionNow coming to the last and the best part the prices of these phones, Elephone is priced $100 and the Ulefone Tiger is priced for $110, both are very capable gorgeous looking phones, but if you want a long lasting battery then Ulefone Tiger is the choice. But if you want to spare some amount and are tight on budget then Elephone C1 is a good pick.
Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/01/2016
Foreign Reviews
Ulefone Tiger
Source: ChinaMobileMag
DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/28/2016
Source: ChinaMobileMag
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/28/2016
Ulefone Tiger
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/17/2016
Source: ChinaMobileMag
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/17/2016
Ulefone Tiger
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/08/2016
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Chinahandys.net
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/08/2016
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Recensione Ulefone Tiger
Source: AndroidWorld.it
IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 85% features: 75% display: 70% mobility: 85% ergonomy: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 85% features: 75% display: 70% mobility: 85% ergonomy: 70%
Recenzja Ulefone Tiger
Source: Tabletowo
PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 75% display: 75% mobility: 95% workmanship: 75%
Source: Tabletowo
PL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 75% display: 75% mobility: 95% workmanship: 75%
Comment
ARM Mali-T720 MP2: Integrated graphics card in ARM based SoCs. Can be configured with up to 8 cores (T720 MP8) and 650 MHz core clock (at 28nm). Supports OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11 FL9_3, and Renderscript.
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
MT6737: ARM based quad-core SOC (4x Cortex-A53) with 64-bit support and a clock of up to 1.3 GHz.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
