Ulefone S8 Pro

Specifications

Price comparison

Reviews for the Ulefone S8 Pro

73% Ulefone S8 Pro
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 73% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%

[Análisis] Ulefone S8 Pro, un gama de entrada sin marcos de rebajas en TomTop
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice display; decent cameras; good hardware; nice connectivity.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/07/2017

Ulefone S8 Pro: belépőszintű mobil 16 ezer Forintért
Source: KinaTech HU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; dual SIM. Negative: Average performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/28/2019

65% Test Ulefone S8 Pro
Source: Tek.no NO→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 65%

Comment

ARM Mali-T720 MP2: Integrated graphics card in ARM based SoCs. Can be configured with up to 8 cores (T720 MP8) and 650 MHz core clock (at 28nm). Supports OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11 FL9_3, and Renderscript.

These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

MT6737: ARM based quad-core SOC (4x Cortex-A53) with 64-bit support and a clock of up to 1.3 GHz.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

5.30":

It is a very small display format for smartphones. You should by no means be mis-sighted and you will generally see very little on the screen and only have a small resolution available. In return, the device should be very small and handy.

Ulefone:

Shenzhen Ulefone Technology Co, Ltd is a Chinese company that specializes in manufacturing smartphones. The company was founded in 2014 and has since launched a variety of Android smartphones. However, before 2014, it was already a manufacturer for other brands (OEM).

69%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.

» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.

Similar devices with the Same Specs

Similar devices from a different Manufacturer