Toshiba Portégé R200

Specifications

Pricecompare

Reviews for the Toshiba Portégé R200

40% Ultraportable Notebooks
Source: Wired Magazine Archive.org version
Toshiba's R200 may be an attractive choice - if aesthetics like glossy metallic trim and soothing blue lights are of the utmost importance to you. Wired: Lightest model in the group. Quick access to ports and control knobs. Tired: Screen is comparably dim and fuzzy. Three-hour, 19-minute battery life is the worst. Price too high for low performance.
kurzer Vergleichstest von Notebook-Modellen; Test nur in der Zeitschrift verfügbar

4 von 10, Preis/Leistung schlecht, Leistung niedrig, Display schlecht, Akkulaufzeit sehr schlecht
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 11/01/2006
Rating: Total score: 40% price: 40% performance: 40% display: 40%

Foreign Reviews

76% Toshiba Portégé R200
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/05/2006
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 65% performance: 65% features: 74% mobility: 82% ergonomy: 73%

85% Schicke Jubiläums-Variante
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 05/01/2006
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 75% workmanship: 85%

62% Rechenpower für das Handgepäck
Source: Facts DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/01/2006
Rating: Total score: 62%

Testbericht Toshiba Portege R200
Source: Notebookcheck DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/27/2006
Rating: workmanship: 85%

70% Flachmann-Power
Source: PC Professionell DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 11/01/2005
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 35%

Toshiba Portégé R200
Source: c't DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/01/2005

Toshiba Portégé R200
Source: Tom's Hardware DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/01/2005

78% Toshiba Portégé R200
Source: PC Welt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/01/2005
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 76% performance: 68% features: 62% ergonomy: 91%

Comment

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 900 is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip with shared memory on Mobile Intel 915GM chipset. It is the predecessor of Graphics Media Accelerator 950. The performance can be compared with the Mobile Radeon 9000 (with a 64 bit memory bus).

These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

Intel Pentium M: With Intel chip set (855 or 915) and Intel WLAN also available with the name Centrino (name for the package).
In the comparison very fast per megahertz and very modest with weaknesses in floating point operations.
It is also available as a low voltage version with very small current consumption.

753: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

12.10":

This range of display format is largely the upper limit for tablets and the lower limit for subnotebooks.

The advantage of subnotebooks is that the entire laptop can be small in size and therefore easily portable. The tiny display has the added advantage of requiring little power, which further improves battery life and thus mobility. The disadvantage is that reading texts is exhausting for the eyes. High resolutions, which one is used to from a standard laptop, are almost not usable.

The same applies to tablets in this size range.

Toshiba: Toshiba Corporation is a Japanese conglomerate or technology group. The company was established in 1939 and in 1978 Toshiba became the official company name. The company's products and services include power, industrial and social infrastructure systems, elevators and escalators, electronic components, semiconductors, hard drives, printers, batteries, lighting, logistics and information technology. Toshiba was one of the largest manufacturers of personal computers, consumer electronics, home appliances and medical equipment.

68.5%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.

» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.