Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarAsus U5A
Specifications
Asus U5A
Processor
Intel Pentium M 750
Graphics adapter
Display
12.1 inch 4:3, 1024 x 768 pixel
Storage
, GB
, : 0GB, 0rpm
Additional features
Mobile Intel Alviso 915GM, HDD: 0GB, 0rpm, ,
Weight
1.5 kg ( = 52.91 oz / 3.31 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Average of 3 scores (from 4 reviews)
Average of 3 scores (from 4 reviews)
price: 80%, performance: 78%, features: 93%, display: 90% mobility: 74%, workmanship: 95%, ergonomy: 87%, emissions: 85%
Reviews for the Asus U5A
Subnotebooks
Source: Chip.de
DE→EN
Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/04/2006
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 75% performance: 75% features: 90% display: 94% mobility: 74% ergonomy: 79%
Source: Chip.de
DE→ENComparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/04/2006
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 75% performance: 75% features: 90% display: 94% mobility: 74% ergonomy: 79%
Asus U5A Subnotebook
Source: Minitechnet DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/08/2006
Rating: performance: 75% display: 85% workmanship: 95% emissions: 85%
Source: Minitechnet
DE→ENSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/08/2006
Rating: performance: 75% display: 85% workmanship: 95% emissions: 85%
Leicht und flott
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy DE→EN
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2006
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 85%
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy
DE→ENSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2006
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 85%
Business-Winzling
Source: PC Professionell DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/01/2006
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 85% features: 95% ergonomy: 95%
Source: PC Professionell
DE→ENSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/01/2006
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 85% features: 95% ergonomy: 95%
Comment
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 900 is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip with shared memory on Mobile Intel 915GM chipset. It is the predecessor of Graphics Media Accelerator 950. The performance can be compared with the Mobile Radeon 9000 (with a 64 bit memory bus). These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.Intel Pentium M: With Intel chip set (855 or 915) and Intel WLAN also available with the name Centrino (name for the package).
In the comparison very fast per megahertz and very modest with weaknesses in floating point operations.
It is also available as a low voltage version with very small current consumption.
750: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
12.1":
This screen diagoal is quite large for tablets but small for subnotebooks. Some convertibles are also represented with that size.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.1.5 kg:
This weight is typical for big tablets, small subnotebooks, ultrabooks and convertibles with a 10-11 inch display-diagonal.
Asus: ASUSTeK Computer Incorporated, a Taiwanese multinational company, produces motherboards, graphics cards, optical drives, PDAs, computer monitors, notebook computers, servers, networking products, mobile phones, computer cases, computer components, and computer cooling systems. The company's 2007 revenues reached US$6.9 billion. ASUS also produces components for other manufacturers. The Eee PC initiated the netbook boom in 2008.
In the notebook sector, Asus had a global market share of about 11% from 2014-2016, making it the fourth largest laptop manufacturer. In the smartphone sector, Asus is not among the Top 5 and has only a small market share (as of 2016).
83.67%: This rating should be considered to be average. This is because the proportion of notebooks which have a higher rating is approximately equal to the proportion which have a lower rating.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.