Notebookcheck Logo

Google Tensor G2 vs Apple M1

Google Tensor G2

► remove from comparison Google Tensor G2

The Google Tensor G2 SoC is a chip that was developed by Google and Samsung for the Google Pixel smarthpones. It is the successor to the Google Tensor G1 and still integrates the same CPU cores. This processor part includes two fast ARM Cortex-X1 cores at up to 2.85 GHz (up from 2.8 GHz of the G1), two mid-range Cortex-A78 cores at up to 2.35 GHz and four small ARM Cortex-A55 efficiency cores with up to 1.8 GHz. The caches are identical with 4 MB CPU L3 cache and 8 MB system level cache. Therefore, the CPU performance is very similar to the first generation of the Tensor SoC.

A big upgrade is the new TPU, which should be more powerful and power efficient compared to its predecessor. In our tests, the AI performance is about 50% higher.

The iGPU was also improved, and now uses a more modern ARM Mali G710 architecture with 7 cores.

The chip also integrates a Titan M2 security processor, a LPDDR5 memory controller, and an ISP for 10-bit HDR / 4k/60 video and 108 MP cameras.

The SoC is manufactured in 5nm at Samsung.

Apple M1

► remove from comparison Apple M1

The Apple M1 is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the late 2020 MacBook Air, MacBook Pro 13, and Mac Mini. It offers 8 cores divided in four performance cores and four power-efficiency cores. The big cores offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 12 MB shared L2 cache. According to Apple the performance of these cores should be better than anything on the market (in late 2020). The four efficiency cores are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. The efficiency cores (E cluster) clock with 600 - 2064 MHz, the performance cores (P cluster) with 600 - 3204 MHz.

The M1 is available in two TDP variants, a passive cooled 10 Watt variant for the MacBook Air and an active cooled faster variant for the MacBook Pro 13 and Mac Mini. Those should offer a better-sustained performance according to Apple.

The integrated graphics card in the M1 offers 8 cores (7 cores in the entry MacBook Air) and a peak performance of 2.6 teraflops. Apple claims that it is faster than any other iGPU at the time of announcement.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine with a peak performance of 11 TOPS (for AI hardware acceleration), a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), a unified memory architecture, Thunderbolt / USB 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders.

The Apple M1 includes 16 billion transistors (up from the 10 billion of the A12Z Bionic and therefore double the amount of a Tiger Lake-U chip like the i7-1185G7) and is manufactured in 5nm at TSMC.

ModelGoogle Tensor G2Apple M1
CodenameCortex X1 / A76 / A55
Clock1800 - 2850 MHz2064 - 3220 MHz
L3 Cache4 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology5 nm5 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G78MP20 GPUARMv8 Instruction Set
iGPUARM Mali-G710 MP7Apple M1 8-Core GPU
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerstore.google.com
SeriesApple M1
Series: M1
Apple M1 Max compare2.06 - 3.22 GHz10 / 10 cores48 MB L3
Apple M1 Pro compare2.06 - 3.22 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core compare2.06 - 3.22 GHz8 / 8 cores16 MB L3
Apple M1 « 2.06 - 3.22 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
L1 Cache2 MB
L2 Cache16 MB
Transistors16000 Million

Benchmarks

Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 M1 +
110 Points (62%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 M1 +
444 Points (8%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 M1 +
min: 7409     avg: 7728     median: 7800.5 (7%)     max: 7830 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 M1 +
min: 1496     avg: 1512     median: 1514.5 (64%)     max: 1520 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 M1 +
min: 401     avg: 403     median: 402.5 (44%)     max: 406 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 M1 +
min: 1863     avg: 2040     median: 2093.5 (5%)     max: 2109 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 M1 +
min: 1020     avg: 1063     median: 1072 (7%)     max: 1087 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 M1 +
min: 206     avg: 207.3     median: 208 (58%)     max: 208 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
100%
1 M1 +
34614 MIPS (20%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 M1 +
5441 MIPS (64%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 M1 +
964 Seconds (12%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 M1 +
min: 412     avg: 561     median: 561 (4%)     max: 710 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 M1 +
0.7 sec (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 4086     avg: 4596     median: 4672 (44%)     max: 4983 Points
58%
M1 +
2711 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 4336     avg: 4765     median: 4875 (56%)     max: 4985 Points
64%
M1 +
min: 1956     avg: 3137     median: 3136.5 (36%)     max: 4317 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 1428     avg: 1452     median: 1450 (36%)     max: 1480 Points
163%
M1 +
2363 Points (59%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 3383     avg: 3638     median: 3600 (14%)     max: 3967 Points
240%
M1 +
8622 Points (33%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
1487 Points (47%)
159%
M1 +
2366 Points (75%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
3862 Points (16%)
224%
M1 +
8635 Points (35%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1036     avg: 1053     median: 1049 (40%)     max: 1078 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3093     avg: 3198     median: 3217 (6%)     max: 3265 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1069 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3272     avg: 3277     median: 3276.5 (10%)     max: 3281 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4771     avg: 4784     median: 4782 (48%)     max: 4800 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12110     avg: 12684     median: 12839.5 (13%)     max: 12946 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4609     avg: 4625     median: 4624.5 (51%)     max: 4640 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12072     avg: 12113     median: 12112.5 (16%)     max: 12153 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13256     avg: 13487     median: 13486.5 (21%)     max: 13717 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4061     avg: 4137     median: 4137 (62%)     max: 4213 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 919.6     avg: 992     median: 1011.5 (1%)     max: 1074.5 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 298     avg: 300.7     median: 300.7 (3%)     max: 303.3 ms
394%
M1 +
min: 65.2     avg: 75.9     median: 76.4 (1%)     max: 86.1 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 43817     avg: 45221     median: 44948 (33%)     max: 47939 Points
139%
M1 +
min: 62055     avg: 63340     median: 62589.5 (46%)     max: 66974 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 90     avg: 98.6     median: 98 (27%)     max: 111 Points
193%
M1 +
189 Points (52%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 98     avg: 110     median: 98 (18%)     max: 134 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 M1 +
min: 104389     avg: 105297     median: 105297 (88%)     max: 106205 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 M1 +
min: 110874     avg: 111266     median: 111266 (90%)     max: 111658 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 M1 +
min: 533978     avg: 539206     median: 539206 (99%)     max: 544434 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 M1 +
min: 267169     avg: 271808     median: 271808 (98%)     max: 276446 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 M1 +
min: 1017190     avg: 1027580     median: 1027580 (99%)     max: 1037960 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 619727     avg: 692109     median: 657414 (32%)     max: 773857 Points
169%
M1 +
min: 1040910     avg: 1113810     median: 1113810 (54%)     max: 1186710 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 148269     avg: 185009     median: 186042 (46%)     max: 206520 Points
137%
M1 +
min: 244643     avg: 254253     median: 254252 (63%)     max: 263862 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
min: 58.7     avg: 60.1     median: 60.1 (41%)     max: 61.5 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
min: 511.8     avg: 513     median: 512.7 (14%)     max: 513.66 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
min: 23.61     avg: 27.3     median: 27.3 (13%)     max: 30.92 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
min: 721.29     avg: 1148     median: 1147.6 (29%)     max: 1573.94 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 23085     avg: 26691     median: 26679.5 (12%)     max: 30321 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 10530     avg: 11184     median: 11397 (42%)     max: 11736 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 886     avg: 900     median: 895 (33%)     max: 934 Points
143%
M1 +
min: 1266     avg: 1301     median: 1283 (48%)     max: 1355 Points
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M1 +
27.2 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 3.6     avg: 5.8     median: 6.5 (3%)     max: 7.34 Watt
76%
1 M1 +
min: 8.23     avg: 8.7     median: 8.5 (4%)     max: 9.49 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M1 +
3 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0.751     avg: 1.2     median: 1 (1%)     max: 2.18 Watt
32%
1 M1 +
min: 2.29     avg: 2.9     median: 3.1 (4%)     max: 3.22 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 M1 +
37.5 Points per Watt (28%)

Average Benchmarks Google Tensor G2 → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Apple M1 → 186% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 30. 04:47:18

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14635 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12937 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759200438s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 29 Sep 2025 12:06:34 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14635 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 14635 +0.007s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12937 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 12937 +0.007s ... 0.02s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.028s ... 0.049s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.049s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)