Notebookcheck Logo

Telechips TCC8803 1GHz vs Intel Atom N450

Telechips TCC8803 1GHz

► remove from comparison TCC8803 1GHz

ARM Mali 2D/3D graphics accelerator, DDR / DDR2 / LP-DDR2 / LP-DDR2 memory interface, LVDS Transmitter, HDMI 1.4, Composite TV-Out (NTSC / PAL), USB 2.0 HS OTG, USB 2.0 host, USB 1.1 HOST, EHI (External Host Interface), UART, NAND Flash Interface

Telechips' TCC88xx application processor will redefine the mobile device of tomorrow with new' innovative user experience by PC-like web browsing, 1080p full HD video record & playback, intuitive user interfaces, location based services and next generation social networking applications. TCC88xx supports development of planned features for the Tablet PC and HMP of tomorrow with tremendous performance and programmability to support new applications yet to be imagined. TCC88xx is equipped with hardwired VPU/GPU/ISP to maximize multimedia experience at its peak level.

 

Intel Atom N450

Intel N450

The Intel Atom N450 is a small and cheap entry level CPU for Netbooks and small laptops. In the package is an integrated memory controller for DDR2 main memory and the GMA 3150 graphics card. 

The performance of the whole system (Atom N450 and integrated GMA 3150) is only sufficient for basic tasks like surfing the web, or office working. HD video, video cutting, advanced photo editing, multitasking and of course gaming may overstrain the GPU and CPU. Compared to the previous Atom generation, the performance gain is only marginally above a similar clocked Atom N280 / GMA 950. To decode HD videos in 1080p the N450 / GMA3150 needs the help from a additional chip like the the ION2 or Broadcom video decoder.

An advantage of the interation, is the small overall power consumption of the CPU, GPU and memory controller (only 5.5 Watt TDP). Intel states 20% power reduction and 60% package reduction. Therefore, the chip is ideally used in small Netbooks, MIDs, and thin laptops. Compared to the Z500 series combined with the US15W chipset (2.4+2.3 W), the power consumption is similar.

show full text
ModelTelechips TCC8803 1GHzIntel Atom N450
Series Intel Atom
Series: Atom Pinetrail
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHz2 cores
Apple A6 compare1 GHz2 cores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST compare2 cores
unknown compare cores
Intel Atom D525 compare1.8 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N455 compare1.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N450 « 1.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N435 compare1.33 GHz1 / 2 cores
Clock1000 MHz1660 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 2
65 nm45 nm, 0.8-1.175V
ArchitectureARMx86
Announced
CodenamePinetrail
FSB533
L2 Cache512 KB
TDP5.5 Watt
Transistors123 Million
Die Size66 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketFCBGA559
Featuresintegrated DDR2 (667 MHz) memory controller, integrated GMA 3150 GPU, Hyperthreading, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
$64 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N450 +
min: 0.23     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.24 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N450 +
min: 457     avg: 553     median: 560 (3%)     max: 589 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N450 +
min: 741     avg: 861     median: 865 (1%)     max: 938 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N450 +
min: 3252     avg: 3766     median: 3719 (44%)     max: 5166 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N450 +
min: 115.8     avg: 120.7     median: 117 (24%)     max: 161.7 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N450 +
min: 473     avg: 493.3     median: 494 (1%)     max: 501 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N450 +
min: 22     avg: 40.5     median: 22 (5%)     max: 92 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N450 +
min: 54     avg: 104.2     median: 54 (2%)     max: 303.3 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N450 +
min: 1320     avg: 1835     median: 1341 (6%)     max: 4370 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 N450 +
min: 4000     avg: 4150     median: 4000 (2%)     max: 4560 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 N450 +
min: 3500     avg: 3501     median: 3500 (3%)     max: 3506 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 N450 +
min: 1270     avg: 1349     median: 1340 (3%)     max: 1444 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 N450 +
min: 2.3     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (29%)     max: 2.4 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N450 +
813 Points (1%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
13.4 MFLOPS (1%)

Average Benchmarks Telechips TCC8803 1GHz → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N450 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 15. 10:30:51

#0 checking url part for id 3327 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 539 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 May 2024 05:39:12 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.059s ... 0.061s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.061s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3327 +0.003s ... 0.063s

#7 got single benchmarks 3327 +0.007s ... 0.07s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 539 +0.002s ... 0.073s

#9 got single benchmarks 539 +0.096s ... 0.169s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.169s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.06s ... 0.229s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.254s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)