Samsung R700-A003UK
Specifications

Price comparison
Average of 15 scores (from 21 reviews)
Reviews for the Samsung R700-A003UK
Source: Pocket Lint

The Samsung R700 isn't the most powerful notebook in its market but for less than £700 there is plenty to recommend it. We found it powerful and versatile to use, especially the keyboard and screen, which are both of the highest quality. Overall, this is a great machine for any family with mixed needs and a rather limited budget.
8 von 10, Preis sehr gut, Ausstattung gut
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/16/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% features: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews

Though the R700 is by no means feature rich or high performance, it has all the right features and good enough performance to make it a very attractive proposition at this price. A capacious 250GB hard drive and 2GB of RAM means it ticks along nicely, while HDMI output isn't a luxury you won't find on too many "budget" notebooks. Its decent battery performance is just the icing on the cake and an excellent keyboard and deceptively slim design add further to its value and appeal.
(von 10): 8, Ausstattung 6, Leistung 7, Preis zufriedenstellend
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/15/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 70% features: 60%
Source: vnunet.com

A maximum battery life of just over three hours is another bonus, although again this notebook is likely to be plugged in much of the time. The Samsung R700 is a quality desktop replacement notebook housed in an equally impressive chassis. It’s certainly capable of impressive general purpose performance, but those after a portable gaming machine need to look elsewhere.
(von 5): 4, Ausstattung 3, Leistung 4
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/06/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% features: 60%
Source: Tech Advisor

Samsung already has the budget laptops market sewn up with the deliciously priced £399 Samsung R60. The Samsung R700-A003UK is a rather different animal, filling in the gaps inevitably left by the R60's budget price tag. The Samsung R700-A003UK is an excellent laptop for the money. The screen's large, the processor is fast and the drive options are vast. With a laptop like this available, why would you want to look any further?
(von 5): 4.5, Verarbeitung 4, Ausstattung 4.5, Preis/Leistung 4.5
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/04/2008
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 90% features: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: PC Pro

It all adds up to a very well-put together laptop, with a great screen and a sense of style that belies its low price. As long as portability isn't high on your list of priorities the R700 is a fine choice. A great 17in screen, healthy performance and attractive styling for under £500 make this a laptop worth shouting about.
5 von 6, Display sehr gut, Preis/Leistung gut, Mobilität gut, Leistung gut
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/31/2007
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 80%
Foreign Reviews
Source: mobile Zeit - 5/08

Comparison, online available, Length Unknown, Date: 10/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: SFT - 8/08

Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/01/2008
Rating: mobility: 60%
Source: Notebookcheck

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/11/2008
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 90% display: 81% mobility: 71% workmanship: 82% ergonomy: 82% emissions: 88%
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy - 7-8

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/23/2008
Rating: price: 90% performance: 90% display: 80%
Source: Magnus.de

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/03/2008
Rating: Total score: 100% price: 90% performance: 90% features: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: PC Magazin - 6/08

Single Review, , Very Short, Date: 06/01/2008
Rating: price: 80% performance: 90% display: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Magnus.de

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/31/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Chip.de

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/27/2008
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 72% features: 83% display: 82% mobility: 85% ergonomy: 80% emissions: 80%
Source: PC Go - 6/08

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 05/02/2008
Rating: price: 90% performance: 90% features: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: PC Magazin - 6/08

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 05/02/2008
Rating: price: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: PC Go - 6/08

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 05/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 90% performance: 90% features: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Notebookjournal

User Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/17/2008
Rating: workmanship: 80% emissions: 70%
Source: Netzwelt

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/15/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 50% workmanship: 50%
Source: Notebookjournal

Review Type Unknown, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2008
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 60% performance: 70% features: 50% display: 30% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 60%
Source: Notebookjournal

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/28/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 60% performance: 60% features: 50% display: 30% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 70%
Source: PC Actual

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/11/2008
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 92%
Comment
NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS: NVidia GeForce 8400M GS is the DirectX 10 capable successor of the GeForce Go 7400 for laptops and technologically a slower 8400M GT video card (because of the smaller 64 Bit memory bus).
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Core 2 Duo: This is the Core Duo and Core Solo successor with a longer pipeline and 5-20% more speed without more power consumption. As an addition to the Core Duo design there exists a fourth decoder, an amplified SSE-unit and an additional arithmetical logical unit (ALU).
The Core 2 Duo for laptops is identical to the desktop Core 2 Duo processors but the notebook-processors work with lower voltages (0.95 to 1188 Volt) and a lower Frontside bus clock (1066 vs 667 MHz). The performance of equally clocked notebooks is 20-25% lower than Desktop PCs because of the lower Frontside bus clock and the slower hard disks.
T5450: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.