Samsung Q45 Aura T7100 Duke
Average of 4 scores (from 10 reviews)
Reviews for the Samsung Q45 Aura T7100 Duke
Source: PC Go DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/16/2007
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% features: 50%
Source: Handys - 6/07
Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 11/07/2007
Rating: mobility: 80%
Source: PC Magazin - 12/07
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 11/02/2007
Rating: price: 80% features: 60%
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 10/31/2007
Rating: performance: 80% mobility: 60% emissions: 90%
Source: Connect - 10/07
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 10/01/2007
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 84% features: 80% mobility: 56% ergonomy: 88%
Source: Chip.de - 10/07
Single Review, , Very Short, Date: 09/20/2007
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 90% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 60% ergonomy: 40%
Source: Minitechnet DE→EN
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/22/2007
Rating: price: 60% performance: 60% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy DE→EN
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/15/2007
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90%
Source: PC Praxis DE→EN
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/20/2007
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 60% performance: 40% display: 80% mobility: 80%
Source: mobile Zeit DE→EN
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/20/2007
Rating: performance: 80% features: 80%
CommentIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip on a Mobile Intel 965GM chipset. It is the successor of GMA 950 and features a fully programmable pipeline (supports Aero Glass fully and DirectX 10 with newest drivers). The peformance of the X3100 is clearly better than the GMA 950, still demanding modern games won't run fluently. These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Core 2 Duo: This is the Core Duo and Core Solo successor with a longer pipeline and 5-20% more speed without more power consumption. As an addition to the Core Duo design there exists a fourth decoder, an amplified SSE-unit and an additional arithmetical logical unit (ALU).
The Core 2 Duo for laptops is identical to the desktop Core 2 Duo processors but the notebook-processors work with lower voltages (0.95 to 1188 Volt) and a lower Frontside bus clock (1066 vs 667 MHz). The performance of equally clocked notebooks is 20-25% lower than Desktop PCs because of the lower Frontside bus clock and the slower hard disks.
T7100: Entry level to mid-range (at the time of annoucement) dual core processor based on the Merom core.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
This screen diagoal is quite large for tablets but small for subnotebooks. Some convertibles are also represented with that size.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
This weight is typical for very big tablets, subnotebooks, ultrabooks and convertibles with a 11-13 inch display-diagonal.
Samsung: The Samsung Group is composed of numerous international businesses, all united under the Samsung brand in South Korea. The meaning of the Korean word Samsung is "tristar" or "three stars". The Samsung brand is one of the most important brands of South Korea. Samsung is an international notebook manufacturer of medium size according market shares and reviews.
In 2015 and 2016, Samsung had a market share of around 24-25% in the global smartphone market and was undisputed market leader. In the laptop sector, Samsung is on the 8th place in the global manufacturer rankings from 2014-2016 with 1.7-2.7%.
In 2016 Samsung slipped into a crisis due to exploding smartphone batteries and a failed recall action.
76.25%: This rating is not convincing. The laptop is evaluated below average, this is not really a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.