Maxdata Belinea o.book 4
Average of 4 scores (from 7 reviews)
Reviews for the Maxdata Belinea o.book 4
Source: PC Advisor
With a sub-£700 asking price, the Belinea o.book 4 is a reasonable if not exactly stand out machine. It's fast enough to handle most things you're likely to throw at it provided you don't want to play games and it's pleasant enough to look at. It offers little in the way of surprises - HDMI is about as unexpected as it gets - but the Belinea o.book 4 is a good, dependable machine.
gut, Preis zufriedenstellend, Leistung zufriedenstellend
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/25/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 70%
Source: Notebookjournal DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/09/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 50% features: 50% display: 30% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70% emissions: 80%
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy - 7-8
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/23/2008
Rating: mobility: 90%
Source: Minitechnet DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/18/2008
Rating: performance: 80% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 60% ergonomy: 40%
Source: Notebookjournal DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/27/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 50% features: 50% display: 50% mobility: 70% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 50%
Source: PC Go - 5/08
Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 05/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 80% features: 80% mobility: 80%
Source: mobile Zeit - 3/08
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/09/2008
Rating: price: 80%
CommentIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip on a Mobile Intel 965GM chipset. It is the successor of GMA 950 and features a fully programmable pipeline (supports Aero Glass fully and DirectX 10 with newest drivers). The peformance of the X3100 is clearly better than the GMA 950, still demanding modern games won't run fluently. These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Core 2 Duo: This is the Core Duo and Core Solo successor with a longer pipeline and 5-20% more speed without more power consumption. As an addition to the Core Duo design there exists a fourth decoder, an amplified SSE-unit and an additional arithmetical logical unit (ALU).
The Core 2 Duo for laptops is identical to the desktop Core 2 Duo processors but the notebook-processors work with lower voltages (0.95 to 1188 Volt) and a lower Frontside bus clock (1066 vs 667 MHz). The performance of equally clocked notebooks is 20-25% lower than Desktop PCs because of the lower Frontside bus clock and the slower hard disks.
T7100: Entry level to mid-range (at the time of annoucement) dual core processor based on the Merom core.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
This screen diagoal is quite large for tablets but small for subnotebooks. Some convertibles are also represented with that size.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
This weight is typical for very big tablets, subnotebooks, ultrabooks and convertibles with a 11-13 inch display-diagonal.
81.25%: This rating should be considered to be average. This is because the proportion of notebooks which have a higher rating is approximately equal to the proportion which have a lower rating.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.