Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 vs Apple M4 (10 cores)

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X Plus X1P-64-100

The Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 is a moderately fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops that debuted in April 2024. The X1P-64-100 has 10 Oryon CPU cores (10 threads) running at no more than 3.4 GHz. Other key features include the 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU, the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and an impressively fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller.

The chip's smarter X Elite series brothers including first and foremost the Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 are thought to be based on the same die with the same NPU but with more CPU cores enabled, higher GPU clock speeds, higher CPU clock speeds and possibly higher power targets as well.

Architecture and Features

Qualcomm Oryon cores are in part based on Nuvia IP; they most likely make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 but it remains to be seen if it is is compatible with GeForce or Radeon discrete graphics cards.

The Qualcomm SoC is said to have 12 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5X-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

Its multi-thread performance is very close to that of the Intel Core i7-13700H and the 9-core Apple M4, meaning this is a pretty fast CPU that's good for most tasks one could possibly throw at it in 2024.

Like any other Windows on ARM platform, the Snapdragon X chip works best with applications and games compiled specifically for ARM processors. If making use of the built-in x86 to ARM emulation mode, a performance penalty of about 20% is to be expected.

Graphics

The 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 iGPU is DirectX 12-enabled but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled, despite featuring VRS and ray tracing support. The 3.8 TFLOPS of performance that it supposedly delivers pale in comparison to the slowest current-generation professional Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that delivers up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

Its gaming performance is rather underwhelming; while slightly faster than the aging Iris Xe (96 EUs), the Adreno is not fast enough to outpace the Radeon 780M meaning there is little point in comparing it with full-fat discrete graphics cards. Baldur's Gate 3, a triple-A title released in 2023, is pretty much unplayable at 1080p / Low. GTA V, a game that saw the light of day in 2015, is playable at 1080p / High.

The Qualcomm iGPU will let you use up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors simultaneously. 2160p120 integrated displays are supported, as are the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (both decoding and encoding). The hardware does not support the VVC codec; that feature remains a Lunar Lake exclusive for now.

Power consumption

The X1P-64-100 is most likely going to be less power-hungry than its more powerful X Elite brothers. Expect to see anything between 10 W and 35 W under long-term workloads because that's what Ryzen U chips normally consume.

The SoC is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for decent, as of H1 2024, energy efficiency.

Apple M4 (10 cores)

► remove from comparison Apple M4 (10 cores)

The 10-core Apple M4 is an impressively fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) sporting 4 performance and 6 efficient CPU cores along with a 16-core neural engine and a 10-core GPU with hardware RT support and other modern features. On-package 7500 MT/s LPDDR5x RAM, USB 4 support and Thunderbolt 4 support are onboard as well, as are Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3.

The M4 debuted in May 2024 as part of an iPad launch event; its 4 performance cores run at up to 4.4 GHz, representing a healthy improvement over the M3 (10-core GPU) and its 4.06 GHz top clock speed. Besides, this new chip also has 6 efficient cores at its disposal that run at up to 2.9 GHz. The M3 had to make do with 4 performance cores and 4 efficient cores, for reference.

Architecture and Features

The new CPU cores run at faster clock speeds than what the M3 was capable of while also featuring some minor architectural improvements. A heavily customized version of ARM's v9.4-A microarchitecture is reportedly employed here. The M4 comes with on-package LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (120 GB/s) whereas the M3 was limited to 6400 MT/s. The updated NPU delivers up to 38 TOPS of performance for AI workloads.

Performance

In 2024 iPad Pros, the 3 nm chip is 10% to 20% faster than the M3 (10 GPU cores) in both multi-thread and single-thread short-term workloads. It also delivers about 10% higher multi-thread performance than the 9-core M4. This puts the 10-core part on an equal footing with the Ryzen 7 7745HX, Core i7-13705H and other higher-end x86 processors released in 2023 and 2024.

iPad Pros come with no active cooling solution however Mac minis and MacBook Pros do have one and the latest iMacs probably do as well. As our Fall 2024 Mac mini review shows, the M4's short-term performance doesn't benefit much from the presence of a fan, however its sustained performance benefits tremendously.

Graphics

The M4 GPU (10 cores) has hardware support for ray tracing as well as mesh shading and other modern technologies. It supports external displays with resolutions as high as 8K.

The graphics adapter runs at higher clock speeds than what the (otherwise identical) 10-core GPU built into the 9-core M4 can muster. As our Mac mini 2024 review confirmed, its performance is good enough to run many 2023 and 2024 games at 1080p on low or medium quality settings.

Much like it is with CPU performance, M4-powered iPad Pros will be much slower in long-term GPU-intensive workloads than iMacs, Mac minis and MacBook Pros due to the lack of proper cooling.

Power consumption

This specific M4 chip is found in 2024 iPad Pros, 2024 iMacs, 2024 Mac minis and 2024 MacBook Pros. Within the thin metal cases of the iPads - no active cooling - the chip's sustained power consumption hovers in the 4 W - 5 W area, with short-term peaks of up to 14 W possible. However, Mac minis and MacBook Pros do have an active cooling solution (and the new iMacs probably do, too) meaning the power consumption figures are several times higher. In our Fall 2024 Mac mini review, the SoC consumed 30 W to 40 W when under high loads.

The M4 is built with a "second generation" 3 nm TSMC process which is still cutting-edge as of late 2024.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100Apple M4 (10 cores)
CodenameOryon
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon XApple M4
Series: M4
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE compare3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 compare - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 compare - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 « - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 compare - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 compare - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 compare - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) compare2.59 - 4.51 GHz16 / 16 cores
Apple M4 Max (14 cores) compare2.59 - 4.51 GHz14 / 14 cores
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) compare2.59 - 4.51 GHz14 / 14 cores
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) compare2.59 - 4.51 GHz12 / 12 cores
Apple M4 (10 cores) « 2.89 - 4.46 GHz10 / 10 cores
Apple M4 (9 cores) compare2.9 - 4.4 GHz9 / 9 cores
Apple M4 (8 cores) compare2.9 - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores
Clock <=3400 MHz2890 - 4464 MHz
L1 Cache2.3 MB
L2 Cache12 MB4 MB
L3 Cache6 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 10
10 x 3.4 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
10 / 10
4 x 4.5 GHz Apple M4 P-Core
6 x 2.9 GHz Apple M4 E-Core
Technology4 nm3 nm
iGPUQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPSApple M4 10-core GPU
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com
TDP40 Watt
TDP Turbo PL240 Watt
Transistors28 Million
FeaturesUnified Memory LPDDR5X-7500 (120 GB/s), 16-Core Neural Engine, Media Engine (Encoding / Decoding: H.264, HEVC, ProRes, ProRes RAW, AV1 Decoding only)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X Plus X1P-64-100
30.9 pt (51%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
109 Points (61%)
min: 173     avg: 174.2     median: 174 (98%)     max: 177 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
795 Points (15%)
min: 815     avg: 921     median: 958 (18%)     max: 986 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
8644 Points (8%)
min: 12335     avg: 13338     median: 13833 (13%)     max: 13845 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1129 Points (47%)
min: 2165     avg: 2202     median: 2173 (91%)     max: 2269 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
420 Points (46%)
565 Points (62%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3252 Points (8%)
3642 Points (9%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1989 Points (13%)
min: 1901     avg: 1907     median: 1907 (12%)     max: 1913 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
209 Points (58%)
min: 300     avg: 302     median: 302 (84%)     max: 304 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
21.3 Points (27%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2661 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
17854 Points (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
242.1 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
8.1 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
11885 Points (19%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
37289 MIPS (21%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4652 MIPS (55%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.5 fps (11%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
751 Seconds (10%)
min: 389     avg: 397     median: 397 (5%)     max: 405 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
402 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (16%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
17.5 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
37.5 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
873 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
13595 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
16496 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4652 Points (20%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2445 Points (61%)
min: 3655     avg: 3747     median: 3748.5 (94%)     max: 3838 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
13278 Points (52%)
min: 14690     avg: 14978     median: 14987.5 (58%)     max: 15173 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
460.8 ms (1%)
min: 262     avg: 277.7     median: 265.4 (0%)     max: 318.8 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
80936 Points (59%)
min: 105178     avg: 111471     median: 110817 (81%)     max: 118492 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
256 Points (70%)
min: 315     avg: 335     median: 334 (92%)     max: 348 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
399 Points (72%)
min: 430     avg: 467.6     median: 478 (86%)     max: 482 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
2716980 Points (90%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
743583 Points (22%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1216 Points (45%)
min: 1944     avg: 2015     median: 2038 (76%)     max: 2066 Points
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
40.6 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
6.8 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
5.3 Watt (4%)
min: 2.68     avg: 3.1     median: 2.8 (2%)     max: 4.09 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4 Watt (4%)
min: 2.68     avg: 3.9     median: 4.1 (5%)     max: 4.76 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
49 Points per Watt (37%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Apple M4 (10 cores) → 144% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 17. 21:55:50

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17589 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17538 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755460550s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Aug 2025 05:18:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.01s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17589 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#8 got single benchmarks 17589 +0.005s ... 0.019s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17538 +0.001s ... 0.02s

#10 got single benchmarks 17538 +0.006s ... 0.026s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.024s ... 0.05s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.051s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)