Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429

Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 780G 5G

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G (SM7350-AB Mobile Platform) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It integrates eight cores (octa-core) divided into three clusters. A fast prime core for single thread performance based on the ARM Cortex-A78 architecture with up to 2.4 GHz. Three additional A78 based performance cores with up to 2.2 GHz and a power efficiency cluster with four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at up to 1.9 GHz. Depending on the workload only single clusters or all cores can run at different clock speeds.

Thanks to the new Cortex-A78 cores, the CPU performance increases by up to 40% compared to the old Snapdragon 768G according to Qualcomm. In our benchmarks, the 780G is able to reach the performance of the old high end chip Kirin 990. The multi-thread performance is similar to the old Snapdragon 865+ in the Galaxy Z Fold2, but using a single core, the 780G is trailing behind.

The integrated X53 5G modem supports up to 3.3 Gbps with sub 6Ghz. The FastConnect 6900 Wi-Fi modem supports the current Wi-Fi 6e standard with 6GHz.

The integrated Qualcomm Adreno 642 offers a 50% higher performance compared to the old Adreno 620 in the predecessor. This is partly thanks to the fast memory controller with LPDDR4X-4200 support.

The integrated 6th gen AI engine called Hexagon 770 offers a 2x improvement and up to 12 TOPS of performance. The Spectra 570 ISP (image signal processor) supports up to three cameras. The satellite system supports all major standards like Beidou, Galileo, GLONASS and GPS.

The G specifies an optimized SoC for gaming and e.g. Qualcomm offers updates for the graphics driver.

The Snapdragon 780G is manufactured in the modern 5 nm process at Samsung (5LPE with EUV).

Qualcomm Snapdragon 429

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 429

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 is an ARM-based entry level SoC for tablets and smartphones (mostly Android based). It was announced in mid 2018 and integrates four 64-Bit Cortex-A53 CPU cores (quad-core) that clock with up to 2 GHz. Furthermore, there is a Adreno 504 graphics card, a LPDDR3 memory controller (max. 933 MHz) and wireless radios for WiFi and 4G/LTE included in the chip.

The Cortex-A53 is the successor of the entry level Cortex-A7 CPU cores. The A53 is now capable of 64 Bit (ARMv8-ISA) and addressing more than 4 GB RAM. According to ARM the performance per MHz is a lot better and even surpasses a Cortex-A9 core.

The integrated Adreno 504 ist the integrated graphics card that supports OpenGL ES 3.1 / 3.2 and Vulkan 1.0. According to Qualcomm, the GPU is 50% faster than the previous Adreno 308 in the Snapdragon 425.

The integrated wireless radios support WiFi 802.11ac Wave 2, Bluetooth 5.0, GPS/GLONASS/Baidou, 2G, 3G and 4G (LTE Cat.4 / Cat.5 - 150 Mbits download, 75 Mbits upload) standards. Futhermore, the SoC is able to decode 1080p videos in H.265 (encode only in H.264) and cameras with up to 13 MP.

The power consumption of the chip is ranging in the lower range, and therefore it is also suited for smaller smartphones. It is manufactured in the modern 12nm process.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 429
CodenameKryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)Cortex-A53
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon
Series: Snapdragon Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G « 1.9 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm QCM6490 compare1.96 - 2.71 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G compare1.9 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G compare1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G compare1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 « 2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM8936 compare1.7 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1900 - 2400 MHz2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 84 / 4
Technology5 nm12 nm
FeaturesAdreno 642 GPU, X53 5G Modem, Hexagon 770 DSP, Specra 570 ISP, FasctConnect 6900 Wi-Fi 6EWLAN 802.11ac Wave 2 (WiFi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, NFC, X6 LTE (Cat 4 150 MBps Down, Cat 5 75 MBps Up), Hexagon 536 DSP, GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, USB 2.0, H.265 (HEVC), H.264 (AVC), VP8, LPDDR3 933 MHz Memory Controller, eMMC 5.1 Quick Charge 3.0
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 642Qualcomm Adreno 504
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 780G 5G
min: 1.074     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (83%)     max: 1.3 pt
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 429
0.2 pt (16%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 SD 429 +
min: 15709     avg: 16114     median: 16113.5 (13%)     max: 16518 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
2354 Points (22%)
min: 1155     avg: 1194     median: 1194 (11%)     max: 1233 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
2567 Points (29%)
min: 1145     avg: 1170     median: 1170 (13%)     max: 1195 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
809 Points (32%)
168 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
2998 Points (5%)
566 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 429 +
168 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 429 +
552 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3674 Points (37%)
860 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
11965 Points (12%)
2485 Points (2%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2679 Points (14%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
3563 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
17573 Points (34%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
7678 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
9815 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1802 ms (2%)
min: 10433     avg: 10544     median: 10544 (12%)     max: 10655 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
26943 Points (20%)
min: 4297     avg: 4345     median: 4344.5 (3%)     max: 4392 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
106 Points (19%)
min: 32     avg: 34     median: 34 (6%)     max: 36 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 SD 429 +
51274 Points (17%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
100%
1 SD 429 +
5470 Points (17%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
100%
1 SD 429 +
20878 Points (26%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
100%
1 SD 429 +
6252 Points (2%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
100%
1 SD 429 +
30859 Points (19%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 SD 429 +
63459 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
75496 Points (63%)
10934 Points (9%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
78048 Points (63%)
27445 Points (22%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
158362 Points (29%)
4783 Points (1%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
156362 Points (57%)
35288 Points (13%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
468196 Points (45%)
78450 Points (8%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
521880 Points (25%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
161037 Points (40%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 SD 429 +
70208 Points (9%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
20384 Points (9%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
11218 Points (41%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
6393 Points (34%)
2454 Points (13%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
0 Points (0%)
4908 Points (10%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
10689 Points (70%)
min: 4267     avg: 4449     median: 4449 (29%)     max: 4631 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
9712 Points (49%)
min: 5986     avg: 6107     median: 6106.5 (31%)     max: 6227 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 → 28% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 14. 05:46:41

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13201 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11422 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1757821601s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 13 Sep 2025 14:08:46 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13201 +0.003s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 13201 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11422 +0.003s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 11422 +0.004s ... 0.018s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.02s ... 0.039s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.002s ... 0.04s

#14 return log +0.001s ... 0.041s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)