Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics vs AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics

AMD Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics

The AMD Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics is a asymmetric Crossfire combination of the Radeon HD 6480G processor graphics card (in Llano APUs) and a dedicated Radeon HD 7450M. The combination was formerly known as Radeon HD 6510G2 (with the Radeon HD 6450M instead of the 7450M which are both based on the same chip).

The Crossfire mode only works for DX10 and DX11 games and may sometimes even decrease performance. In our tests the performance of the combination ranged from a Intel HD Graphics 3000 to a Radeon HD 6490M. Hovever, the combination also suffers from micro stuttering.

AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics

The AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics is the combination of a integrated AMD Radeon HD 6620G APU processor graphics card and a dedicated entry level AMD Radeon HD 7450M graphics card in CrossFire combination. It is called AMD Dual Graphics or asymmetric CrossFire and uses AFR (Alternate Frame Rendering) to render different frames on the two graphic cores. Therefore the combination also suffers from micro stuttering (different spaces between two images lead to stuttering altough the framerate is high enough for fluent gaming with only one GPU).

The performance of the Dual Graphics solution depends greatly on the driver support for the used games. In some games the performance may even degrade by 10-15% compared to using only the APU graphics card. Currently (June 2011) only DirectX 10 and 11 graphics modes are supported and therefore lower settings and older games are not accelerated. Due to the micro stuttering and performance problems, Dual Graphics may impose more problems than bring performance gains.

The features like PureVideo HD (UVD3) or OpenCL support are similar to the two graphics cards.

As both graphics cards are rendering frames, the power consumption is clearly higher than using only one GPU.

AMD Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual GraphicsAMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics
AMD Radeon HD 7400M Series
Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics compare 880 @ 0.4 GHz? Bit @ 1800 MHz
Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics 560 @ 0.4 GHz? Bit @ 1800 MHz
Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics compare 480 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics 400 @ 0.59 GHz64 Bit @ - / 1800 MHz
Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics compare 880 @ 0.4 GHz? Bit @ 1800 MHz
Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics 560 @ 0.4 GHz? Bit @ 1800 MHz
Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics compare 480 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics 400 @ 0.59 GHz64 Bit @ - / 1800 MHz
ArchitectureTerascale 2Terascale 2
Pipelines400 - unified560 - unified
Core Speed593 / 700 MHz400 / 700 MHz
Memory Speed- / 1800 MHz1800 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
technology32+40nm nm32+40nm nm
Date of Announcement08.02.2012 08.02.2012

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
996 Points (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
977 Points (1%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + AMD Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
2899 Points (2%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + AMD Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
2865 Points (2%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
11037 Points (6%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
7024 Points (10%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + AMD Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics
3DMark 06
3648 Points (6%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
11.4 fps (2%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
5.9 Points (75%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
4.6 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + AMD Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
3868 Points (16%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + AMD Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
17.4 fps (6%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Star Wars: The Old Republic

Star Wars: The Old Republic

2011
low 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
23.2  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
10.7  fps
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
68.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
16.5  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
10.8  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
27.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
17.3  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
12.4  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
16.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
14.6  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
13.3  fps
Fifa 12

Fifa 12

2011
low 800x600
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
88.5  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
47.6  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
34.2  fps
F1 2011

F1 2011

2011
low 800x600
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
35  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
24  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
17  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
49.7  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
29  fps
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
41.1  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
28.2  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
26.4  fps
Crysis 2

Crysis 2

2011
low 800x600
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
24.9  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
16.9  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
12.5  fps
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
26.1  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
21.6  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
18.6  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
90.9  fps
med. 1360x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
24.1  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
14.6  fps
low 800x600
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
29.2  fps
med. 1360x768
100%
Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics:
24.6  fps

Average Gaming AMD Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 21. 03:06:04

#0 checking url part for id 2885 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3019 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 20 May 2022 17:25:18 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.06s ... 0.061s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.063s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#8 composed specs +0s ... 0.063s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.064s

#10 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.064s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 2885 +0.03s ... 0.094s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.095s

#13 got single benchmarks 2885 +0.005s ... 0.1s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 3019 +0s ... 0.1s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.101s

#16 got single benchmarks 3019 +0.005s ... 0.106s

#17 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.106s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.106s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#29 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.11s

#30 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.11s

#31 Got 33 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.114s

#32 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.114s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.114s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.114s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.114s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.114s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.114s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.114s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.115s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.115s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.115s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.115s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.115s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.115s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.115s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.115s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.115s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.115s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.115s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.115s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.115s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.115s

#53 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.117s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.119s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.119s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.119s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.12s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.121s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.123s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.124s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.125s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.126s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.127s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.128s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.128s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.13s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#87 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.13s

#88 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.13s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.13s

#90 return log +0.002s ... 0.133s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)