Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs AMD Ryzen 3 3350U

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 PRO 3300U

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (no SMT / Hyperthreading so only 4 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.5 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 6 graphics card with 6 CUs (384 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar consumer variant Ryzen 3 3300U, the PRO model features additional management and security features (e.g., full memory encryption) and longer warranty / availability.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows for higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U should be similar to the Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz but with SMT).

AMD Ryzen 3 3350U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 3350U

The AMD Ryzen 3 3350U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (no SMT / Hyperthreading so only 4 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.5 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 6 graphics card with 6 CUs (384 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar Ryzen 3 3300U, the 3350U offers the same specifications according to AMD.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 3350U should be similar to the Ryzen 5 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz but with SMT).

ModelAMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300UAMD Ryzen 3 3350U
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenameZen+Zen+
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Zen+
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
» AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 84 MB
» AMD Ryzen 3 3350U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
Clock2100 - 3500 MHz2100 - 3500 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million
Technology12 nm12 nm
SocketAM4AM4
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) R3 PRO 3300UAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) R3 3350U
max. Temp.105 °C

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
481 Points (5%)
0255075100125150175200225250275300325350375400425450475Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
126 Points (43%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
5.5 Points (10%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.4 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
22657 Points (20%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
6410 Points (39%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
5408 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
4646 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
6596 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
864 Points (42%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2455 Points (9%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3350U → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 18. 14:28:09

#0 checking url part for id 11336 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13237 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 18 May 2022 13:12:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.009s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#19 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#20 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#21 getting avg benchmarks for device 11336 +0s ... 0.01s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#24 got single benchmarks 11336 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#25 getting avg benchmarks for device 13237 +0s ... 0.016s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#27 got single benchmarks 13237 +0.005s ... 0.022s

#28 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.027s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#39 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.03s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#41 return log +0.003s ... 0.033s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)