, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 300M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 300M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 300M

The NVIDIA GeForce Go 300M business graphic card based on the GeForce Go 7600 for laptops and is optimized (by drivers and Bios) for business tasks. Stability and reliability are focussed. The performance ought to be similar (slightly below) the GeForce Go 7600.

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

DirectX 10 medium class business graphic card, which is optimized for compatibility and stability. The graphic card seems to have the same core like the 8700M series and therefore shows good performance data.

A particularity of the graphic card are the "Unified Shaders". There don't exist any more dedicated pixel- and vertex shaders but 16 so called Stream processors maintain the upcomming graphic work (which was done by the pixel and vertex Shaders, up to now).

The memory clock of the Quadro NVS 320M depends on the implemented memory type: 400 MHz with GDDR2 and 700 MHz with GDDR3.

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 300MNVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro NVS Series
Quadro NVS 5100M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro NVS 320M 32 @ 0.58 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 300M 8/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro NVS 140M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 160M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 150M compare 8 @ 0.53 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 135M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro NVS 130M compare 8 64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 120M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 110M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.3 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro NVS 5100M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro NVS 320M 32 @ 0.58 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 300M 8/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro NVS 140M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 160M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 150M compare 8 @ 0.53 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 135M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro NVS 130M compare 8 64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 120M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 110M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.3 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
CodenameG72GLMG84M
Pipelines8 / 5 Pixel- / Vertexshader32 - unified
Core Speed450 MHz575 MHz
Memory Speed500 MHz700 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3GDDR3, GDDR2
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 9b, Shader 3.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Transistors177 Million289 Million
technology90 nm80 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sizedlarge
Date of Announcement24.05.2006 09.06.2007
InformationPCI-E
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro_nvs_...http://www.nvidia.de/page/quadronvs_note...
ArchitectureG8x
Shader Speed1150 MHz
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB
FeaturesShader clock frequence 1200 MHz, PureVideo technology (H.264, VC-1, MPEG2, WMV9 decoder acceleration), HDCP-capable, PowerMizer 7.0 energy management (dynamic switching between performance and energy saving), HDR (high dynamic-range lighting), designed for Windows Vista, 16x full image AA, 16x AF independent on angles, 128-bit HDR illumination with AA, Dual-Link DVI exits for TFT resolutions up to 2560x1600, PCI-E 16x, OpenGL 2.1, Gigathread technology

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
29508 Points (31%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
13895 Points (7%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 9070     avg: 9075     median: 9074.5 (13%)     max: 9079 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
3DMark 06
4781 (9%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
3DMark 06
4769 Points (9%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
Quadro NVS 320M:
365  fps
med. 800x600
Quadro NVS 320M:
139  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro NVS 320M:
49  fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
Quadro NVS 320M:
166  fps
med. 640x480
Quadro NVS 320M:
163.5  fps
high 800x600
Quadro NVS 320M:
154.3  fps
ultra 1024x768
Quadro NVS 320M:
124  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
Quadro NVS 320M:
468.4  fps

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 27. 04:20:50

#0 checking url part for id 57 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 208 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:22:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.05s ... 0.05s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.05s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.05s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 57 +0.024s ... 0.075s

#8 got single benchmarks 57 +0s ... 0.075s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 208 +0s ... 0.075s

#10 got single benchmarks 208 +0.005s ... 0.08s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.08s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.002s ... 0.081s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.081s

#14 Got 8 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.083s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.083s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.084s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.086s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.086s

#19 return log +0.003s ... 0.089s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)