NVIDIA Quadro NVS 300M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 300M

► remove NVIDIA Quadro NVS 300M

The NVIDIA GeForce Go 300M business graphic card based on the GeForce Go 7600 for laptops and is optimized (by drivers and Bios) for business tasks. Stability and reliability are focussed. The performance ought to be similar (slightly below) the GeForce Go 7600.

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

► remove NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

DirectX 10 medium class business graphic card, which is optimized for compatibility and stability. The graphic card seems to have the same core like the 8700M series and therefore shows good performance data.

A particularity of the graphic card are the "Unified Shaders". There don't exist any more dedicated pixel- and vertex shaders but 16 so called Stream processors maintain the upcomming graphic work (which was done by the pixel and vertex Shaders, up to now).

The memory clock of the Quadro NVS 320M depends on the implemented memory type: 400 MHz with GDDR2 and 700 MHz with GDDR3.

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M

► remove NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M

The Nvidia Quadro NVS 150M is a business graphics adapater for notebooks. It is based on the GeForce 9200M GS consumer graphics card but features special drivers which are optimized for business applications. A shor list of the applications which are certified for the NVS line can be found here (including MS Office, Exceed, Notes, McAffee, pcAnywhere, Bloomberg, Reuters, Tradestation).

The gaming performance should be similar to the GeForce 9200M GS and therefore only suited for less demanding games with low details. Still the business drivers are not optimized for games and may therefore show a worse performance (or some bugs). The memory is clocked either with 700 MHz (DDR3) or 400 MHz (DDR2) which is noticable slower.

Compared to the Quadro NVS 160M, the 150M features a slower clock speed and only supports resolutions up to 1680x1050 (digital) or 1600x1200 (analog).

As the 9200M GS, the Quadro NVS 150M also supports PureVideo HD to decode HD videos with the graphics chip (and save current).

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 300MNVIDIA Quadro NVS 320MNVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro NVS Series
Quadro NVS 5100M 48 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro NVS 320M 32 @ 575 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 300M 8/5 cores @ 450 MHz128 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro NVS 140M 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 160M 8 @ 580 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 150M 8 @ 530 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 135M 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro NVS 130M 8 64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 120M 4/3 cores @ 450 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 110M 4/3 cores @ 300 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro NVS 5100M 48 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro NVS 320M 32 @ 575 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 300M 8/5 cores @ 450 MHz128 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro NVS 140M 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 160M 8 @ 580 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 150M 8 @ 530 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 135M 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro NVS 130M 8 64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 120M 4/3 cores @ 450 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 110M 4/3 cores @ 300 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro NVS 5100M 48 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro NVS 320M 32 @ 575 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 300M 8/5 cores @ 450 MHz128 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro NVS 140M 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 160M 8 @ 580 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 150M 8 @ 530 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 135M 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro NVS 130M 8 64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 120M 4/3 cores @ 450 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 110M 4/3 cores @ 300 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
CodenameG72GLMG84M
8 / 5 32 - 8 -
Core450 MHz575 MHz530 MHz
Memory500 MHz700 MHz700 MHz
Bus128 Bit128 Bit64 Bit
MemoryGDDR3GDDR3, GDDR2GDDR2, GDDR3
nonono
DirectXDirectX 9b, 3.0DirectX 10, 4.0DirectX 10, 4.0
Transistors177 Million289 Million
Technology90 nm80 nm65 nm
Size
Introduced24.05.2006 09.06.2007 15.08.2008
PCI-EPCI-Express, max 1680x1050 bzw 1600x1200 (analog).
Manufacturerhttp://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro_nvs_...http://www.nvidia.de/page/quadronvs_note...http://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro_nvs_...
ArchitectureG8x
Shader1150 MHz1300 MHz
Max. Memory512 MB256 MB
FeaturesShader clock frequence 1200 MHz, PureVideo technology (H.264, VC-1, MPEG2, WMV9 decoder acceleration), HDCP-capable, PowerMizer 7.0 energy management (dynamic switching between performance and energy saving), HDR (high dynamic-range lighting), designed for Windows Vista, 16x full image AA, 16x AF independent on angles, 128-bit HDR illumination with AA, Dual-Link DVI exits for TFT resolutions up to 2560x1600, PCI-E 16x, OpenGL 2.1, Gigathread technology

OpenGL 2.1

3DMark 2001SE - Standard 1024x768
29508 Points (31%)
min: 13215     avg: 14212     median: 14211.5 (15%)     max: 15208 Points
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
13895 Points (7%)
min: 5042     avg: 5520     median: 5520 (3%)     max: 5998 Points
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
min: 9070     avg: 9075     median: 9074.5 (17%)     max: 9079 Points
min: 3092     avg: 3265     median: 3264.5 (6%)     max: 3437 Points
3DMark 06 + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M → 100%

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M → 52%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
Quadro NVS 320M:
365  fps
Quadro NVS 150M:
319  fps
med. 800x600
Quadro NVS 320M:
139  fps
Quadro NVS 150M:
63  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro NVS 320M:
49  fps
Quadro NVS 150M:
21  fps
Quadro NVS 320M:
»
Quadro NVS 150M:
»
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
Quadro NVS 320M:
166  fps
med. 640x480
Quadro NVS 320M:
163.5  fps
high 800x600
Quadro NVS 320M:
154.3  fps
ultra 1024x768
Quadro NVS 320M:
124  fps
Quadro NVS 320M:
»
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
Quadro NVS 320M:
468.4  fps
Quadro NVS 150M:
196.2  fps
Quadro NVS 320M:
»
Quadro NVS 150M:
»
v1.10
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)