, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M

► remove from comparison

Performance workstation grafic chip with DirectX 10 support and OpenGL 2.1 support. Probaby, it bases upon the NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT.

It is intended for digital content creators, engineers, geologic scientists and other professional 3D applications.

The drivers of the Quadro FX series are certified for CAD applications (e.g. AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Solid Edge, ...) and DCC applications (e.g. Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3D, ...) and offer a 12-bit precision for subpixel, full image-antialiasing, hardware accelerated antialiasing for dots and lines and additional drivers are for CAD and DCC optimized settings.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

The Nvidia Quadro FX 2700M is a professional graphics card for laptops. It features certified drivers that are optimized for CAD (e.g., AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Solid Edge, ..), DCC (e.g., Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3D, ...), and visualization applications. The FX 2700M is based on the G94 core and therefore similar to the GeForce 9700M GTS.

The Quadro FX series of cards are optimized for professional applications like CAD or DCC. Especially the OpenGL performance should be noticeable better than with consumer GeForce cards. The certified drivers, that come with the Quadro cards guarantee a frictionless work with applications like AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3d and others. Furthermore they offer 12-Bit precision for subpixels, fullscreen anti-aliasing, hardware accelerated antialiasing for points and lines and other CAD and DCC optimizations.

 

NVIDIA Quadro FX 570MNVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameG64GLMNB9E-GLM2
ArchitectureG8xG9x
Pipelines32 - unified48 - unified
Core Speed475 MHz530 MHz
Shader Speed950 MHz1325 MHz
Memory Speed700 MHz800 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory256 MB1024 MB
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Transistors289 Million504 Million
technology80 nm65 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sizedlarge
Date of Announcement01.06.2007 14.08.2008
InformationPowermizer 7.0, CG Shading language, 32 bit floating point precision, 12 bit subpixel precision, 128 bit graphic pipeline, vertex and pixelshader programmability, PureVideo HD, PCI-E interface, FSAA with turned grid, nView multidisplay support, high-precision dynamic-range (HPDR) technology, hardware 3D clipping, full image antialiasing
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.de/page/quadrofx_go.htmlhttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...
FeaturesOpenGL 2.1, PowerMizer 8.0, PureVideo HD

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
2799 Points (3%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
2392 Points (2%)
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 24479     avg: 26908     median: 26907.5 (28%)     max: 29336 Points
36280 Points (38%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 11586     avg: 11958     median: 11957.5 (6%)     max: 12329 Points
min: 23330     avg: 23842     median: 23841.5 (12%)     max: 24353 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 7674     avg: 7790     median: 7700 (11%)     max: 7997 Points
min: 13450     avg: 14224     median: 14224 (21%)     max: 14998 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
3DMark 06
3883 (7%)
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
7580 (14%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
3DMark 06
3800 Points (7%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
7660 Points (14%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
3DMark 06
3904 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
4534 (21%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
4394 (21%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
9.3 fps (4%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M → 169% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 570M:
436  fps
med. 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 570M:
128  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 570M:
19 22 24 29 43 43 45 49 ~ 34 fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 570M:
118  fps
med. 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 570M:
116.7  fps
high 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 570M:
111.3  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 570M:
89.7  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 570M:
501  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 23. 07:34:43

#0 checking url part for id 182 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 883 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 19 Jun 2021 17:20:53 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.046s ... 0.047s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.047s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.047s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 182 +0.024s ... 0.07s

#8 got single benchmarks 182 +0.007s ... 0.077s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 883 +0s ... 0.078s

#10 got single benchmarks 883 +0.005s ... 0.083s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.083s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.088s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.088s

#14 Got 15 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.09s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.09s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.091s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.093s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.093s

#19 return log +0.003s ... 0.096s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)