Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

The Nvidia Quadro FX 2700M is a professional graphics card for laptops. It features certified drivers that are optimized for CAD (e.g., AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Solid Edge, ..), DCC (e.g., Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3D, ...), and visualization applications. The FX 2700M is based on the G94 core and therefore similar to the GeForce 9700M GTS.

The Quadro FX series of cards are optimized for professional applications like CAD or DCC. Especially the OpenGL performance should be noticeable better than with consumer GeForce cards. The certified drivers, that come with the Quadro cards guarantee a frictionless work with applications like AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3d and others. Furthermore they offer 12-Bit precision for subpixels, fullscreen anti-aliasing, hardware accelerated antialiasing for points and lines and other CAD and DCC optimizations.

 

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M

This is a professional video card for notebooks from NVidia It is based on 7900GTX.

The application performance is very good due to special professional drivers (3D rendering, CAD), but the gaming performance is weaker. With modded drivers, it should work like a 7900 GTX.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700MNVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameNB9E-GLM2G71glm
ArchitectureG9xG7x
Pipelines48 - unified24 / 8 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed530 MHz500 MHz
Shader Speed1325 MHz
Memory Speed800 MHz600 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB512 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 9c, Shader 3.0
Power Consumption65 Watt45 Watt
Transistors504 Million278 Million
technology65 nm90 nm
FeaturesOpenGL 2.1, PowerMizer 8.0, PureVideo HD90nm
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement14.08.2008 29.09.2005
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...http://www.nvidia.de/page/quadrofx_go.html

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
2799 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
2392 Points (2%)
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
36280 Points (38%)
27600 Points (29%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 23330     avg: 23842     median: 23841.5 (12%)     max: 24353 Points
min: 18100     avg: 18342     median: 18341.5 (10%)     max: 18583 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 13450     avg: 14224     median: 14224 (16%)     max: 14998 Points
min: 8400     avg: 8450     median: 8450 (9%)     max: 8500 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
3DMark 06
7580 Points (11%)
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
min: 4690     avg: 4695     median: 4695 (7%)     max: 4700 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
3DMark 06
7660 Points (11%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
4394 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M → 69% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 05. 01:55:26

#0 checking url part for id 883 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 02 Oct 2022 17:27:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.044s ... 0.044s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.048s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#22 composed specs +0s ... 0.048s

#23 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#24 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.048s

#25 getting avg benchmarks for device 883 +0.027s ... 0.075s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.075s

#27 got single benchmarks 883 +0.006s ... 0.081s

#28 getting avg benchmarks for device 5 +0s ... 0.081s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.082s

#30 got single benchmarks 5 +0.005s ... 0.087s

#31 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.087s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.087s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.087s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.09s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.09s

#49 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.09s

#50 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.09s

#51 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.092s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.093s

#53 return log +0.002s ... 0.095s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)