Packard Bell EasyNote TJ74
Specifications
Packard Bell EasyNote TJ74
Processor
AMD Athlon II M300 2 x 2 GHz, Caspian
Graphics adapter
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel, glossy: yes
Weight
2.7 kg ( = 95.24 oz / 5.95 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
500 Euro
Price comparison
price: 80%, performance: - %, features: - %, display: 80% mobility: - %, workmanship: - %, ergonomy: - %, emissions: - %
Reviews for the Packard Bell EasyNote TJ74
Packard Bell EasyNote TJ74 review
Source: Tech Advisor
Archive.org version
The Packard Bell TJ74 is a safe middle-of-the-road purchase with no major drawbacks. It doesn’t suffer from the compromises required of an ultra-slim design and it costs less than most of its competitors although its hardware is somewhat less impressive
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/05/2010
Rating: price: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor
Archive.org versionThe Packard Bell TJ74 is a safe middle-of-the-road purchase with no major drawbacks. It doesn’t suffer from the compromises required of an ultra-slim design and it costs less than most of its competitors although its hardware is somewhat less impressive
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/05/2010
Rating: price: 80%
Foreign Reviews
Ревю на Packard Bell EasyNote TJ 74
Source: PC Store
BU→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/19/2010
Rating: display: 80%
Source: PC Store
BU→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/19/2010
Rating: display: 80%
Comment
ATI Radeon HD 4200: Onboard graphics adapter (RS880M chipset) with UVD2 (PIP support) and DX 10.1 support (compared to the older HD 3200). Beware, possibly no 2D acelleration in Windows XP (as the HD3200).
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
M300:
Entry level dual core CPU by AMD which features an integrated memory controller (400MHz DDR2) and is based (partially?) on the K10 core. The performance should be compareable to an old Merom based 1.8 Core 2 Duo. The CPU supports 64 Bit and Virtualization.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
