Oukitel K4000 Plus

Specifications

Price comparison

Reviews for the Oukitel K4000 Plus

73% Oukitel K4000 Plus
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 73% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%

64% Recensione Oukitel K4000 Plus
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 90% features: 65% display: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 65% ergonomy: 65%

60% Oukitel K4000 Plus: un entry-level con alti e bassi, dal prezzo incredibile
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%

Comment

ARM Mali-T720 MP2: Integrated graphics card in ARM based SoCs. Can be configured with up to 8 cores (T720 MP8) and 650 MHz core clock (at 28nm). Supports OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11 FL9_3, and Renderscript.

These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

MT6737: ARM based quad-core SOC (4x Cortex-A53) with 64-bit support and a clock of up to 1.3 GHz.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

5.00":

This display is tiny. You will probably see very little on the screen and be able to use mini-resolutions.

Oukitel:

Oukitel is a Chinese smartphone brand and a company founded in 2007. The company is known for producing affordable smartphones with large batteries. Oukitel smartphones are very popular in emerging markets such as Africa and Southeast Asia. Popular Oukitel smartphones include the Oukitel K10000 with a huge 10,000 mAh battery and the Oukitel C21, which has a 6.4-inch FHD+ display and quad camera. Oukitel also produces rugged smartphones like the Oukitel WP10, which is IP68 certified and can withstand extreme temperatures and harsh environments.

65.67%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.

» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.

Similar devices from a different Manufacturer