Oppo A91
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.0, 26mm, 1/3.1", 1.0 µm)
Price comparison
Average of 12 scores (from 41 reviews)
Reviews for the Oppo A91
The A91 is advertised by Oppo as an entry-level smartphone, but at 300 Euros it is already on the threshold of the middle class. The Oppo mobile phone wants to score with a large AMOLED display, a lot of memory, a quad camera and a strong battery. You can find out whether the mix is right in the review.
Source: Ricks Tech

Support, online available, Medium, Date: 07/12/2022
Source: Ausdroid
Archive.org versionThe inclusion of NFC to this OPPO device is a bonus given their history of exclusion of this. The exclusion of wireless charging, which does help keep the device price low, is somewhat disappointing but for a device sitting sub-$500 beggars can’t be choosers. This can be overlooked thanks to the inclusion of the VOOC USB-C fast charging solution.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/09/2020
Source: Hitech Century
Archive.org versionAs an entry level phone, it’s a bit on the pricey end of things but it’s still cheaper than other competing phones in the market with an AMOLED display and it has the benefit of coming with a relatively complete set of accessories out of the box. The OPPO A91 is well worth a look for casual users seeking a sub-RM1,000 phone an emphasis on fast charging and a vibrant AMOLED display for general use with.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2020
Source: NLT
Archive.org versionWhen we focus at only the phone itself, there is nothing wrong with the phone itself. The chipset might be a little dated, but it still works great. The camera is decent and the battery life is pretty okay.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/01/2020
Source: Pokde
Archive.org versionThere are things that make the OPPO A91 an attractive option such as the display and camera configuration. Personally, I can survive with a normal LCD display instead and have it save more on the battery. However, I can probably see why some would prefer AMOLED instead.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 69% performance: 74% mobility: 80%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Nextpit Germany
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/06/2020
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Nextpit Germany
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/27/2020
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: PCtipp.ch
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/19/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Stadt-bremerhaven
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/23/2020
Source: Teltarif
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 95% performance: 40% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerbase
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/28/2020
Source: Inside Handy
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Computerbild
DE→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Nice display; large battery capacity; elegant design; fast fingerprint sensor; great cameras; quick charging. Negative: Average performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/08/2020
Source: Computerhoy
ES→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 82% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tuexperto
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: High performance; nice display; long battery life; good price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/31/2020
Source: El Androide Libre
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good price; nice design; great built quality; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/24/2020
Source: PC Guia
PT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/04/2020
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 90%
Source: Android Geek
PT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/01/2020
Rating: Total score: 67% performance: 66% display: 76% mobility: 66% workmanship: 70%
Source: Mais Tecnologia
PT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Beautiful design; impressive battery life; decent processor; nice performance; good price. Negative: Poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/30/2020
Source: AndroidWorld.nl
NL→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Stylish design; nice display; good cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/17/2020
Source: Top for Phone
FR→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Beautiful design; great built quality; nice display; excellent speakers; high performance; support 5G; decent cameras; long battery life. Negative: No microSD card slot; no mini jack; no wireless charging.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/31/2020
Source: Top for Phone
FR→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; nice display; good speakers; high performance; great connectivity; long battery life; good price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/24/2020
Source: Tabletowo
PL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/11/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Chip Online TR
TR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/18/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Sabah
TR→EN Archive.org versionPositive: High performance; headphone jack; fast charging; stylish design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/13/2020
Source: Hi-Tech Mail
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Nice AMOLED display; fast fingerprint sensor; excellent cameras; long battery life; fast charging. Negative: Mediocre design; weak processor.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/16/2020
Source: Zing
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Excellent display; quick charging; big screen; decent hardware; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/18/2020
Source: Zing
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Modern design; decent hardware; nice performance; great cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/18/2020
Source: Sohoa VN Express
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Fast fingerprint sensor; quick charging; good price. Negative: Average hardware.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/15/2020
Source: Techtimes.vn
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Attractive price; decent hardware; nice gaming performance; elegant design; nice cameras; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/14/2020
Source: Zing
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Excellent cameras; beautiful design; decent hardware; nice gaming performance; great display; long battery life; quick charging; fast fingerprint sensor.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/13/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good price; nice display; great cameras; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/07/2020
Source: The Gioididong
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Nice quad cameras; fast fingerprint sensor; attractive price.
Hands-On, online available, Long, Date: 03/05/2020
Source: The Gioididong
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Impressive cameras; compact size; nice ergonomy; quick charging. Negative: Average gaming performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/05/2020
Source: Danviet
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Premium design; powerful hardware; high performance; excellent cameras; long battery life; quick charging; good price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/04/2020
Source: Techtimes.vn
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Beautiful design; nice cameras; very fast charging; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/04/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Powerful hardware; high performance; impressive cameras; quick charging.
Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 03/03/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Nice quad cameras; quick charging; good price; beautiful design.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/03/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Nice quad cameras; quick charging; decent hardware; high performance; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/03/2020
Source: Zing
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Excellent quad cameras; fast fingerprint sensor; good price; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/03/2020
Source: FPT shop
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Super AMOLED display; decent processor; nice quad cameras; good price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/27/2019
Comment
ARM Mali-G72 MP3: Integrated graphics card from ARM with 3 cores based on the 2nd generation of the Bifrost architecture.
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Helio P70: ARM based octa-core SoC with 4x big ARM Cortex-A73 cores and 4x small and power efficient ARM Cortex-A53 cores. All clocked up to 2.1 GHz. Integrates a Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL) LTE Modem (4G), ARM Mali-G72 MP3 GPU and a dedicated AI processing unit.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
