Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom N435 vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 vs Intel Atom N455

Intel Atom N435

► remove from comparison Intel N435

The Intel Atom N435 is a small and cheap entry level CPU for Netbooks and small laptops. In the package is an integrated memory controller for DDR2/DDR3 main memory and the GMA 3150 graphics card

The performance of the whole system (Atom N435 and integrated GMA 3150) is only sufficient for basic tasks like surfing the web, or office working. HD video, video cutting, advanced photo editing, multitasking and of course gaming may overstrain the GPU and CPU. Compared to the previous Atom generation, the performance of the CPU is on a level with the slow Atom Z520.

An advantage of the interation, is the small overall power consumption of the CPU, GPU and memory controller (only 5 Watt TDP). Therefore, the chip is ideally used in small Netbooks and thin laptops.

HiSilicon Kirin 655

► remove from comparison  Kirin 655

The HiSilicon Kirin 655 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC for mid-range smartphones and tablets. It was announced late 2016 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores. Four cores can be clocked with up to 1.7 GHz (power saving cores) and four with up to 2.1 GHz (performance cores). The difference to the older Kirin 650 is the 100 MHz higher clock speed of the performance cores.

Furthermore, a ARM Mali-T830 MP2 graphics card (at 600 MHz or 900 MHz with 40.8 GFLOPS), a 64-Bit LPDDR3 memory controller and a dual-sim capable LTE Cat. 6 (max. 300 MBit/s and GSM, WCDMA, UMTS, HSPA+) radio are integrated in the SoC. The processor performance can be compared with the older Kirin 930 and therefore sufficient for daily usage as browsing and non demanding apps. High-end SoCs with Cortex-A57 or A72 cores however should be noticeably faster. The SoC is produced in a modern 16nm FinFET process and is therefore very power efficient.

Intel Atom N455

► remove from comparison Intel N455

The Intel Atom N455 is a small and cheap entry level CPU for Netbooks and small laptops. In the package is an integrated memory controller for DDR3 main memory (the difference to the Atom N450) and the GMA 3150 graphics card

The performance of the whole system (Atom N455 and integrated GMA 3150) is only sufficient for basic tasks like surfing the web, or office working. HD video, video cutting, advanced photo editing, multitasking and of course gaming may overstrain the GPU and CPU. Compared to the previous Atom generation, the performance gain is only marginally above a similar clocked Atom N280 / GMA 950.

An advantage of the combination, is the small overall power consumption of the CPU, GPU and memory controller (only 6.5 Watt TDP). Intel states 20% power reduction and 60% package reduction. Therefore, the chip is ideally used in small Netbooks, MIDs, and thin laptops. Compared to the Z500 series combined with the US15W chipset (2.4+2.3 W), the power consumption is similar.

ModelIntel Atom N435HiSilicon Kirin 655Intel Atom N455
SeriesIntel Atom Intel Atom
CodenamePinetrailCortex-A53Pinetrail
Series: Atom Pinetrail
Intel Atom D5251.8 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N4551.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N4501.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N435 « 1.33 GHz1 / 2 cores
JLQ JR5101.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9352.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6592.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6582.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 « 2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6502 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9302 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6201.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT81611.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA19081.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Intel Atom D5251.8 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N455 « 1.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N4501.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N4351.33 GHz1 / 2 cores
Clock1333 MHz2100 MHz1660 MHz
FSB533533
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
Cores / Threads1 / 28 / 81 / 2
TDP5 Watt6.5 Watt
Technology45 nm16 nm45 nm
SocketFCBGA559FCBGA559
Featuresintegrated DDR2/DDR3 memory controller, integrated GMA 3150 GPU, HyperthreadingARMv8-ISA, Mali-T830 MP2, Dual SIM LTE (Cat. 6), LPDDR3 Memory Controllerintegrated DDR3 memory controller, integrated GMA 3150 GPU, Hyperthreading
Architecturex86ARMx86
Announced
iGPUARM Mali-T830 MP2 (900 MHz)
max. Temp.100 °C
$64 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N455 +
min: 509     avg: 547     median: 564 (3%)     max: 568 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N455 +
min: 840     avg: 856     median: 863 (1%)     max: 866 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N455 +
min: 3712     avg: 3751     median: 3750.5 (44%)     max: 3789 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N455 +
min: 118     avg: 119.5     median: 119.5 (24%)     max: 121 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N455 +
min: 445     avg: 476.7     median: 490 (1%)     max: 495 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N455 +
min: 92     avg: 94     median: 95 (21%)     max: 95 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N455 +
min: 202     avg: 213.7     median: 207 (9%)     max: 232 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N455 +
min: 4417     avg: 4523     median: 4533 (20%)     max: 4618 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 N455 +
min: 4196     avg: 4197     median: 4198 (2%)     max: 4198 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 N455 +
min: 3505     avg: 3506     median: 3506 (3%)     max: 3506 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 N455 +
min: 1261     avg: 1317     median: 1266 (3%)     max: 1423 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 N455 +
min: 2.3     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (29%)     max: 2.4 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 13535     avg: 13553     median: 13535 (11%)     max: 13590 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
1438 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
1391 Points (16%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 780     avg: 784     median: 784 (11%)     max: 788 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3240     avg: 3291     median: 3290.5 (8%)     max: 3341 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 8768     avg: 9071     median: 9070.5 (11%)     max: 9373 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4199     avg: 4415     median: 4414.5 (4%)     max: 4630 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 56764     avg: 56781     median: 56781 (19%)     max: 56798 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
162396 Points (21%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 4383     avg: 4401     median: 4401 (22%)     max: 4419 Points

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 655 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N455 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 19. 22:45:27

#0 checking url part for id 2692 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8478 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 602 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.059s ... 0.06s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.06s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 2692 +0.002s ... 0.062s

#8 got single benchmarks 2692 +0.007s ... 0.069s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8478 +0.003s ... 0.072s

#10 got single benchmarks 8478 +0.012s ... 0.084s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 602 +0.002s ... 0.086s

#12 got single benchmarks 602 +0.045s ... 0.131s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.131s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.059s ... 0.19s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.19s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)