Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom N435 vs Intel Atom N455

Intel Atom N435

► remove from comparison Intel N435

The Intel Atom N435 is a small and cheap entry level CPU for Netbooks and small laptops. In the package is an integrated memory controller for DDR2/DDR3 main memory and the GMA 3150 graphics card

The performance of the whole system (Atom N435 and integrated GMA 3150) is only sufficient for basic tasks like surfing the web, or office working. HD video, video cutting, advanced photo editing, multitasking and of course gaming may overstrain the GPU and CPU. Compared to the previous Atom generation, the performance of the CPU is on a level with the slow Atom Z520.

An advantage of the interation, is the small overall power consumption of the CPU, GPU and memory controller (only 5 Watt TDP). Therefore, the chip is ideally used in small Netbooks and thin laptops.

Intel Atom N455

► remove from comparison Intel N455

The Intel Atom N455 is a small and cheap entry level CPU for Netbooks and small laptops. In the package is an integrated memory controller for DDR3 main memory (the difference to the Atom N450) and the GMA 3150 graphics card

The performance of the whole system (Atom N455 and integrated GMA 3150) is only sufficient for basic tasks like surfing the web, or office working. HD video, video cutting, advanced photo editing, multitasking and of course gaming may overstrain the GPU and CPU. Compared to the previous Atom generation, the performance gain is only marginally above a similar clocked Atom N280 / GMA 950.

An advantage of the combination, is the small overall power consumption of the CPU, GPU and memory controller (only 6.5 Watt TDP). Intel states 20% power reduction and 60% package reduction. Therefore, the chip is ideally used in small Netbooks, MIDs, and thin laptops. Compared to the Z500 series combined with the US15W chipset (2.4+2.3 W), the power consumption is similar.

ModelIntel Atom N435Intel Atom N455
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Atom
CodenamePinetrailPinetrail
Series: Atom Pinetrail
Intel Atom D525 compare1.8 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N4551.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N450 compare1.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N435 « 1.33 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom D525 compare1.8 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N455 « 1.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N450 compare1.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N4351.33 GHz1 / 2 cores
Clock1333 MHz1660 MHz
FSB533533
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
Cores / Threads1 / 21 / 2
TDP5 Watt6.5 Watt
Technology45 nm45 nm
SocketFCBGA559FCBGA559
Featuresintegrated DDR2/DDR3 memory controller, integrated GMA 3150 GPU, Hyperthreadingintegrated DDR3 memory controller, integrated GMA 3150 GPU, Hyperthreading
Architecturex86x86
Announced
max. Temp.100 °C
$64 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
Errors [Close]

#0 Stopped to cacheFillTable as currently in progress (1 sys_registry entries found) +0s ... 0.005s

#1 sys_registry tx_nbc2fe_gpusingle_2 entry uid:586042 from 2024.04.22 05:40 +0s ... 0.005s

#2 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 581> for benchmark 22, setting:36 +0s ... 0.085s

#3 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 888> for benchmark 22, setting:37 +0s ... 0.086s

#4 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 4743> for benchmark 50, setting:204 +0s ... 0.087s

#5 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 149> for benchmark 50, setting:203 +0s ... 0.088s

#6 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 509> for benchmark 5, setting:2245 +0s ... 0.089s

#7 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 95> for benchmark 6, setting:2242 +0s ... 0.09s

#8 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 232> for benchmark 7, setting:2243 +0s ... 0.092s

#9 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 4618> for benchmark 8, setting:2244 +0s ... 0.093s

#10 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 4269> for benchmark 10, setting:2277 +0s ... 0.094s

#11 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 3565> for benchmark 11, setting:2278 +0s ... 0.095s

#12 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 1516> for benchmark 16, setting:19 +0s ... 0.096s

#13 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 2.4> for benchmark 59, setting:224 +0s ... 0.097s

log 22. 05:47:17

#0 checking url part for id 2692 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 602 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 will recreate cache as older than 5 days: 1713757637s = 19835.157835648d, id:gpuID:2692 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 table tx_nbc2_benchcache_cpu already found +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 About to fill cache table +0s ... 0.005s

#6 composed specs +0.016s ... 0.021s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.021s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 2692 +0.002s ... 0.023s

#9 got single benchmarks 2692 +0.007s ... 0.03s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 602 +0.002s ... 0.032s

#11 got single benchmarks 602 +0.051s ... 0.083s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.083s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.085s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.086s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.087s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.088s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.089s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.09s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.092s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.093s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.094s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.095s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.096s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.097s

#25 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.097s

#26 return log +0.033s ... 0.13s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)