Intel Celeron N2920 vs Intel Celeron N2910

Intel Celeron N2920

► remove Intel N2920

The Intel Celeron N2920 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.86 - 2.0 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock and the 4 cores, the Celeron N2920 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. On average, the N2920 competes with AMDs Kabini APU A4-5000. For most everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 844 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks and doesn't require extensive cooling systems.

Intel Celeron N2910

► remove Intel N2910

The Intel Celeron N2910 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 1.6 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2910 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to our benchmarks, the N2910 competes with AMD Kabini APUs like the A6-1450. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2920Intel Celeron N2910
Intel CeleronIntel Celeron
Bay Trail-MBay Trail-M
: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2930 compare1.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2815 compare1.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2807 compare1.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2930 compare1.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2815 compare1.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2807 compare1.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2
1860 - 2000 MHz1600 MHz
224 KB224 KB
2 MB2 MB
4 / 44 / 4
7.5 7.5
22 22
105 °C100 °C
FCBGA1170
HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 844 MHz), Dual-Channel DDR3L-1066 (max. 8 GB), Wireless Display
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 854 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.
Intel Celeron N2920Intel Celeron N2910

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 116     avg: 119     median: 118.5 (3%)     max: 121 Points
97 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 32     avg: 32.5     median: 32.5 (12%)     max: 33 Points
27 Points (10%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.38     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (3%)     max: 1.47 Points
1.1 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.37     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (12%)     max: 0.38 Points
0.3 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1011     avg: 1030     median: 1030 (9%)     max: 1049
844 (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3434     avg: 3530     median: 3530 (6%)     max: 3626
2907 (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 4945     avg: 5095     median: 5094.5 (5%)     max: 5244 Points
4302 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
1453 Points (11%)
1206 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N2920 +
962 s (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N2920 +
32 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N2920 +
1728 (11%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N2920 +
8.4 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N2920 +
42.1 fps (12%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N2920 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N2920 +
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N2920 +
0.2 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1821     avg: 1861     median: 1860.5 (10%)     max: 1900 Points
1612 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
43.7 s (9%)
27 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
95 s (4%)
61 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
2035 s (9%)
1566 s (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 N2920 +
22880 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 N2920 +
12360 MFLOPS (9%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N2920 +
3606 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 N2920 +
min: 1485     avg: 1582     median: 1582 (7%)     max: 1679 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
15979 Points (10%)
13106 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1355 Points (3%)
1107 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1952 Points (5%)
1566 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 N2910 +
2001 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 N2910 +
1743 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 N2910 +
2189 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 N2910 +
2544 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 N2910 +
2205 Points (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2920 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2910 → 86% n=15

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)