Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N2810 vs Intel Celeron N2930

Intel Celeron N2810

► remove from comparison Intel N2810

The Intel Celeron N2810 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 2.0 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2810 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to out benchmarks, the N2810 even competes with AMD APUs like the AMD A4-4355M. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2930

► remove from comparison Intel N2930

The Intel Celeron N2930 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.83 - 2.16 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs. The N2930 supports Quick Sync as well as Wireless Display.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock and the 4 cores, the Celeron N2930 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. Depending on the benchmark, the N2930 competes with AMD Kabini APUs like the A4-5000. For most everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of 313 - 854 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact (and sometimes even passively cooled) subnotebooks and tablets.

ModelIntel Celeron N2810Intel Celeron N2930
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameBay Trail-MBay Trail-M
Series: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2815 compare1.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2810 « 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2807 compare1.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2930 « 1.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2815 compare1.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2807 compare1.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 MHz1830 - 2160 MHz
L1 Cache112 KB224 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
TDP7.5 Watt7.5 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm
FeaturesHD Graphics (Bay Trail, max. 756 MHz)HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 854 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Speedstep
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 854 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketFCBGA1170

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
59 Points (0%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
31 Points (9%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
0.7 Points (1%)
min: 1.39     avg: 1.5     median: 1.6 (2%)     max: 1.59 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.4 Points (9%)
min: 0.4     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.41 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
993 Points (6%)
min: 1120     avg: 1131     median: 1131.5 (7%)     max: 1141 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
1474 Points (1%)
min: 3687     avg: 3865     median: 3880 (3%)     max: 4013 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
2672 Points (2%)
min: 5663     avg: 5709     median: 5708.5 (4%)     max: 5754 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
1318 Points (2%)
min: 1525     avg: 1567     median: 1566.5 (2%)     max: 1608 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1941 s (23%)
852 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
63.4 s (13%)
27.3 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
680 Points (1%)
1181 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
4.3 fps (1%)
9.3 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
22.8 fps (5%)
47 fps (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (1%)
0.2 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1043 Points (2%)
2214 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
43 s (9%)
38.7 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
93.9 s (4%)
84.7 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1999 s (9%)
1814 s (8%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N2810 +
2038 Points (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
858 Points (2%)
min: 1594     avg: 1666     median: 1679 (5%)     max: 1693 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
9157 Points (7%)
min: 4049     avg: 14857     median: 17776 (14%)     max: 18182 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
710 Points (2%)
min: 331     avg: 1258     median: 1477 (4%)     max: 1532 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 N2810 +
969 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1328 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
762 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2192 Points (18%)
2493 Points (20%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2027 Points (18%)
2275 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
1715 Points (3%)
2992 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
1924 Points (4%)
3477 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
1898 Points (5%)
2968 Points (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N2930 +
min: 4664     avg: 9867     median: 7469.5 (9%)     max: 19863 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 N2930 +
min: 378.6     avg: 828     median: 423.3 (5%)     max: 2304 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 N2930 +
min: 1238     avg: 4231     median: 4176.5 (4%)     max: 7334 Points
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
100%
1 N2930 +
41680 Points (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 N2930 +
2046 Points (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2810 → 100% n=30

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2930 → 167% n=30

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 14. 19:15:30

#0 checking url part for id 4577 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5686 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720977330 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 05:16:13 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4577 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#7 got single benchmarks 4577 +0.005s ... 0.011s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 5686 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 5686 +0.006s ... 0.018s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.032s ... 0.05s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.052s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)