Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N2810 vs Intel Celeron N2920

Intel Celeron N2810

► remove from comparison Intel N2810

The Intel Celeron N2810 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 2.0 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2810 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to out benchmarks, the N2810 even competes with AMD APUs like the AMD A4-4355M. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2920

► remove from comparison Intel N2920

The Intel Celeron N2920 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.86 - 2.0 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock and the 4 cores, the Celeron N2920 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. On average, the N2920 competes with AMDs Kabini APU A4-5000. For most everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 844 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks and doesn't require extensive cooling systems.

ModelIntel Celeron N2810Intel Celeron N2920
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameBay Trail-MBay Trail-M
Series: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2930 compare1.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2815 compare1.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2810 « 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2807 compare1.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2930 compare1.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2920 « 1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2815 compare1.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2807 compare1.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 MHz1860 - 2000 MHz
L1 Cache112 KB224 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
TDP7.5 Watt7.5 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm
FeaturesHD Graphics (Bay Trail, max. 756 MHz)HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 844 MHz), Dual-Channel DDR3L-1066 (max. 8 GB), Wireless Display
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 854 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketFCBGA1170
$107 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
59 Points (0%)
min: 116     avg: 118.5     median: 118.5 (1%)     max: 121 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
31 Points (9%)
min: 32     avg: 32.5     median: 32.5 (10%)     max: 33 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
0.7 Points (1%)
min: 1.38     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (2%)     max: 1.47 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.4 Points (9%)
min: 0.37     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.38 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
993 Points (6%)
min: 1011     avg: 1030     median: 1030 (6%)     max: 1049 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
1474 Points (1%)
min: 3434     avg: 3530     median: 3530 (3%)     max: 3626 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
2672 Points (2%)
min: 4945     avg: 5095     median: 5094.5 (4%)     max: 5244 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
1318 Points (2%)
1453 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1941 s (23%)
962 s (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
63.4 s (13%)
32 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
680 Points (1%)
1728 Points (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
4.3 fps (1%)
8.4 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
22.8 fps (5%)
42.1 fps (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (1%)
0.2 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1043 Points (2%)
min: 1821     avg: 1861     median: 1860.5 (4%)     max: 1900 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
43 s (9%)
43.7 s (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
93.9 s (4%)
95 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1999 s (9%)
2035 s (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 N2920 +
22880 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 N2920 +
12360 MFLOPS (9%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
2038 Points (2%)
3606 Points (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
858 Points (2%)
min: 1485     avg: 1582     median: 1582 (4%)     max: 1679 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
9157 Points (7%)
15979 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
710 Points (2%)
1355 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
969 Points (2%)
1952 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2810 +
1328 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2810 +
762 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 N2810 +
2192 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 N2810 +
2027 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 N2810 +
1715 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 N2810 +
1924 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 N2810 +
1898 Points (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2810 → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2920 → 163% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 24. 23:00:51

#0 checking url part for id 4577 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4993 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1721854850 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 05:15:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4577 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#7 got single benchmarks 4577 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 4993 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 4993 +0.004s ... 0.016s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.016s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.027s ... 0.042s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.045s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)