Intel Atom N270 vs Intel Atom N280

Intel Atom N270

► remove Intel N270

The Intel Atom N270 is a typical netbook single core CPU which is clocked at 1.6 GHz. The Atom core was designed for a low power consumption and cheap production. The downside is the relative low performance per Watt (due to the in-order execution) compared to similar clocked Celeron processors, e.g.. Still the integrated Hyper-Threading (the operating system sees the CPU as a dual core CPU) decreases the penalty of the in-order execution a bit.

The performance of the N270 is only compareable to a 1.2 GHz clocked Celeron M and therfore only sufficient for non demanding applications like Office or web surfing. HD videos, advanced photo editing, video cutting may not run fluently. 

Due to the modern 45nm process (in 2009) and the small size, the power consumption is very low (2.5 Watt TDP). Therfore, the CPU does not need a good cooling system and can be used in very small designs (like Netbooks). 

Package: 437-Ball-µFCBGA, 22 mm × 22 mm

Intel Atom N280

► remove Intel N280

The Intel Atom N280 is a typical netbook single core CPU which is clocked at 1.66 GHz. The Atom core was designed for a low power consumption and cheap production. The downside is the relative low performance per Watt (due to the in-order execution) compared to similar clocked Celeron processors, e.g.. Still the integrated Hyper-Threading (the operating system sees the CPU as a dual core CPU) decreases the penalty of the in-order execution a bit.

The performance of the N280 is only compareable to a 1.2-1.3 GHz clocked Celeron M and therfore only sufficient for non demanding applications like Office or web surfing. HD videos, advanced photo editing, video cutting may not run fluently. Compared to the N270, the N280 only offers a minimal higher clock speed and a faster FSB. The performance increase should not really be noticeable.

Due to the modern 45nm process (in 2009) and the small size, the power consumption is very low (2.5 Watt TDP). Therfore, the CPU does not need a good cooling system and can be used in very small designs (like Netbooks). 

Package: 437-Ball-µFCBGA, 22 mm × 22 mm

Intel Atom N270Intel Atom N280
Intel AtomIntel Atom
DiamondVilleDiamondVille
: Atom DiamondVille
Intel Atom 330 (compare)1600 MHz2 / 4
Intel Atom N2801660 MHz1 / 2
» Intel Atom N2701600 MHz1 / 2
Intel Atom 330 (compare)1600 MHz2 / 4
» Intel Atom N2801660 MHz1 / 2
Intel Atom N2701600 MHz1 / 2
1600 MHz1660 MHz
533667
56 KB56 KB
512 KB512 KB
1 / 21 / 2
2.5 2.5
47 47
45 0.9-1.1625 V45 0.9-1.1625 V
26 mm226 mm2
90 °C90 °C
PBGA437PBGA437
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, HHT, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Hyper-ThreadingMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, HHT, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Hyper-Threading
$44 U.S.
Intel Atom N270Intel Atom N280

Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
100%
N270 +
min: 483     avg: 537.6     median: 541 (6%)     max: 577 Points
105%
N280 +
min: 541     avg: 564.4     median: 567 (6%)     max: 585 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
100%
N270 +
min: 482     avg: 818.4     median: 830 (2%)     max: 888 Points
106%
N280 +
min: 835     avg: 868.4     median: 877 (2%)     max: 892 Points
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
100%
N270 +
min: 3673     avg: 4704.7     median: 4741.9 (56%)     max: 5662 seconds
130%
N280 +
3634.9 seconds (43%)
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
100%
N270 +
min: 116     avg: 143.2     median: 126 (25%)     max: 177.75 seconds
103%
N280 +
min: 114.046     avg: 115     median: 115 (23%)     max: 116 seconds
3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
N270 +
min: 461     avg: 475.8     median: 478 (1%)     max: 486 Points
105%
N280 +
min: 487     avg: 500     median: 500 (1%)     max: 513 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 1280x800
100%
N270 +
483 Points (17%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - Standard 1024x768
100%
N270 +
min: 472     avg: 482.3     median: 483 (24%)     max: 492 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 1366x768
100%
N280 +
507 Points (100%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
N270 +
min: 92     avg: 93.4     median: 93 (20%)     max: 95.578 Seconds
101%
N280 +
min: 87     avg: 88.3     median: 89 (19%)     max: 89 Seconds
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
N270 +
min: 202     avg: 210.7     median: 211.5 (9%)     max: 216 Seconds
101%
N280 +
min: 192     avg: 194     median: 194 (8%)     max: 196 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
N270 +
min: 4249     avg: 5121.3     median: 4482 (20%)     max: 7034 Seconds
101%
N280 +
min: 4292     avg: 4302     median: 4301 (19%)     max: 4313 Seconds
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
N270 +
min: 3850     avg: 3977.4     median: 4000 (2%)     max: 4028 MIPS
104%
N280 +
min: 4128     avg: 4154.7     median: 4156 (2%)     max: 4180 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
N270 +
min: 3280     avg: 3330.3     median: 3338 (3%)     max: 3371 MFLOPS
104%
N280 +
min: 3426     avg: 3458.3     median: 3455 (3%)     max: 3494 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
100%
N270 +
min: 1175     avg: 1509.1     median: 1490.5 (9%)     max: 1859 Points
101%
N280 +
min: 1282     avg: 1540.7     median: 1501.5 (9%)     max: 1864 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Processor
100%
N270 +
2.3 points (29%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N270 → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N280 → 105%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2018, 2017
v1.8
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)