ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 vs ATI Mobility Radeon X2500

ATI Mobility Radeon X2300

► remove ATI Mobility Radeon X2300

ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 is the successor of ATI Mobility Radeon X1350 for notebooks. Technically it is just a renamed X1350 and therefore also only supports DirectX 9. Also the gaming performance is compareable to the X1350. This means only very low setting in not very demanding games can be displayed fluently.

As other X1000 cards the X2300 supports AVIVO video engine to accelerate MPEG-2, MPEG-4, DivX, WMV9 and VC-1 videos.

The HD version also supports the UVD acceleration for HD videos.

Aero Glass of Windows Vista should run fluently.

ATI Mobility Radeon X2500

► remove ATI Mobility Radeon X2500

Like the ATI Mobility Radeon X2300, the ATI Mobility Radeon X2500 is a renamed  X1600 / X1700 chip with DirectX 9 support. According first informations the memory bus is reduced to 64 bit (ATI tool and SE nomenclature). Therefore, the video card shows a clearly worse performance.

The card appeared in the laptops Asus Z53Se and F3SE with 128 MB DDR2 memory. According 3DMark 2006 the card is identified as RV530 SE.

The gaming performance ought to be classified comparable to X1400 and is sufficient for not demanding games.

ATI Mobility Radeon X2300ATI Mobility Radeon X2500
ManufacturerATIATI
Mobility Radeon X2000 Series
Mobility Radeon X2500 12/5 cores @ 460 MHz64 / 128 Bit @ 400 MHz
Mobility Radeon X2300 4/2 cores @ 480 MHz128 Bit @ 400 MHz
Mobility Radeon X2500 12/5 cores @ 460 MHz64 / 128 Bit @ 400 MHz
Mobility Radeon X2300 4/2 cores @ 480 MHz128 Bit @ 400 MHz
CodenameM64M66
4 / 2 12 / 5
Core480 MHz460 MHz
Memory400 MHz400 MHz
Bus128 Bit64 / 128 Bit
MemoryDDR1/DDR2/GDDR3DDR2
Max. Memory256 MB256 MB
noyes
DirectXDirectX 9c, 3.0DirectX 9c, 3.0
Transistors105 Million157 Million
Technology80 / 90 nm80 nm
Features90nm Herstellungsprozess, PCI Express X16 Interrace, PoxerPlay 6.0, Avivo Video Architektur (MPEG-2, MPEG-4, DivX, WMV9, VC-1 Beschleunigung), 64-bit Floating Point HDR, Ultra-Threaded Shader EngineAvivo Video and Display Engine. 12 pixelshaders are regulated by 3 cores; Powerplay 6.0
Introduced01.03.2007 01.06.2007
Manufacturerhttp://ati.amd.com/products/MobilityRade...http://ati.amd.com/products/mobilityrade...
Size

3DMark 2001SE - Standard 1024x768
min: 7564     avg: 8354.5     median: 8354 (9%)     max: 9145 Points
min: 13220     avg: 13972.5     median: 13972 (15%)     max: 14725 Points
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
min: 3250     avg: 3605.7     median: 3325 (2%)     max: 4242 Points
6930 Points (4%)
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
min: 1468     avg: 1772.7     median: 1571 (3%)     max: 2279 Points
min: 4110     avg: 4201.5     median: 4201 (8%)     max: 4293 Points
3DMark 06 + ATI Mobility Radeon X2300
Standard 1280x1024 + ATI Mobility Radeon X2500
Windows Vista Experience Index - GPU Games
3.8 Points (63%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - GPU
3.8 Points (63%)
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit + ATI Mobility Radeon X2300

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 → 100%

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon X2500 → 229%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Mobility Radeon X2300:
120  fps
250%
Mobility Radeon X2500:
300  fps
med. 800x600
100%
Mobility Radeon X2300:
35  fps
197%
Mobility Radeon X2500:
69  fps
Mobility Radeon X2300:
»
Mobility Radeon X2500:
»
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Mobility Radeon X2300:
82  fps
med. 640x480
100%
Mobility Radeon X2300:
57.2  fps
high 800x600
100%
Mobility Radeon X2300:
50.2  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Mobility Radeon X2300:
29  fps
Mobility Radeon X2300:
»

Average Gaming ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 → 100%

Average Gaming ATI Mobility Radeon X2500 → 224%

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)