Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 vs ATI Mobility Radeon X2500

ATI Mobility Radeon X2300

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X2300

ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 is the successor of ATI Mobility Radeon X1350 for notebooks. Technically it is just a renamed X1350 and therefore also only supports DirectX 9. Also the gaming performance is compareable to the X1350. This means only very low setting in not very demanding games can be displayed fluently.

As other X1000 cards the X2300 supports AVIVO video engine to accelerate MPEG-2, MPEG-4, DivX, WMV9 and VC-1 videos.

The HD version also supports the UVD acceleration for HD videos.

Aero Glass of Windows Vista should run fluently.

ATI Mobility Radeon X2500

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X2500

Like the ATI Mobility Radeon X2300, the ATI Mobility Radeon X2500 is a renamed  X1600 / X1700 chip with DirectX 9 support. According first informations the memory bus is reduced to 64 bit (ATI tool and SE nomenclature). Therefore, the video card shows a clearly worse performance.

The card appeared in the laptops Asus Z53Se and F3SE with 128 MB DDR2 memory. According 3DMark 2006 the card is identified as RV530 SE.

The gaming performance ought to be classified comparable to X1400 and is sufficient for not demanding games.

show full text
ATI Mobility Radeon X2300ATI Mobility Radeon X2500
Mobility Radeon X2000 Series
Mobility Radeon X2500 12/5 cores @ 0.46 GHz64 / 128 Bit @ 400 MHz
Mobility Radeon X2300 4/2 cores @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 400 MHz
Mobility Radeon X2500 12/5 cores @ 0.46 GHz64 / 128 Bit @ 400 MHz
Mobility Radeon X2300 4/2 cores @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 400 MHz
CodenameM64M66
Pipelines4 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader12 / 5 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed480 MHz460 MHz
Memory Speed400 MHz400 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit64 / 128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR1/DDR2/GDDR3DDR2
Max. Amount of Memory256 MB256 MB
Shared Memorynoyes
APIDirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 9c, Shader 3.0
Transistors105 Million157 Million
technology90 nm80 nm
Features90nm Herstellungsprozess, PCI Express X16 Interrace, PoxerPlay 6.0, Avivo Video Architektur (MPEG-2, MPEG-4, DivX, WMV9, VC-1 Beschleunigung), 64-bit Floating Point HDR, Ultra-Threaded Shader EngineAvivo Video and Display Engine. 12 pixelshaders are regulated by 3 cores; Powerplay 6.0
Date of Announcement01.03.2007 01.06.2007
Link to Manufacturer Pageati.amd.comati.amd.com
Notebook Sizemedium sized

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 7564     avg: 8355     median: 8354.5 (9%)     max: 9145 Points
min: 13220     avg: 13973     median: 13972.5 (15%)     max: 14725 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 3250     avg: 3606     median: 3325 (2%)     max: 4242 Points
6930 Points (4%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 1468     avg: 1773     median: 1571 (2%)     max: 2279 Points
min: 4110     avg: 4202     median: 4201.5 (5%)     max: 4293 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Mobility Radeon X2300
3DMark 06
808 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + ATI Mobility Radeon X2300
3DMark 06
976 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + ATI Mobility Radeon X2500
3DMark 06
2100 Points (3%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 + ATI Mobility Radeon X2500
3DMark 06
min: 2080     avg: 2220     median: 2220 (3%)     max: 2360 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik (Spiele)
3.8 Points (56%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik
3.8 Points (56%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + ATI Mobility Radeon X2300
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
1787 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon X2500 → 214% n=3

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Mobility Radeon X2300:
120  fps
250%
Mobility Radeon X2500:
300  fps
med. 800x600
100%
Mobility Radeon X2300:
35  fps
197%
Mobility Radeon X2500:
69  fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Mobility Radeon X2300:
82  fps
med. 640x480
100%
Mobility Radeon X2300:
57.2  fps
high 800x600
100%
Mobility Radeon X2300:
50.2  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Mobility Radeon X2300:
29  fps

Average Gaming ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ATI Mobility Radeon X2500 → 224%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 197%

ATI Mobility Radeon X2300lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F.E.A.R.12035
Doom 38257.250.229.02
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1
2


1

1








ATI Mobility Radeon X2500lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F.E.A.R.30069
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1

1












For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 26. 18:52:05

#0 checking url part for id 59 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 96 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.096s ... 0.097s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.097s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.097s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 59 +0.024s ... 0.12s

#8 got single benchmarks 59 +0.017s ... 0.137s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 96 +0.002s ... 0.139s

#10 got single benchmarks 96 +0.008s ... 0.147s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.147s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.191s ... 0.338s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.338s

#14 Got 8 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.34s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.34s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.341s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.006s ... 0.347s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.347s

#19 return log +0.048s ... 0.394s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)