Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5450 vs AMD Radeon HD 6310

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5450

► remove from comparison

The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5450 is an entry-level / lower middle class DirectX 11 graphics card for laptops. It is manufactured in 40nm and is based on the Park (Pro) architecture of entry level graphic chips (dedicated). In contrast to the faster HD 5470, the HD 5450 supports no GDDR5.

Due to the similar clock rate, the 3D gaming performance should be on one level with the HD 4570 (predecessor with same TDP range). Therefore, all current games should be playable in low-medium details. Demanding games, like Crysis, NFS Shift, or Modern Warfare ran on the HD 4570 for example only in low detail settings fluently. Less demanding games like Left 4 Dead should run in high detail settings.

The memory interface of the Mobility 5470 is composed out of one 64 bit wide controller that can access (G)DDR2 or (G)DDR3. If DDR2 is used by the laptop vendor the performance might be a bit worse.

The HD5450 offers only 80 MADD cores (called Stream Processors) which are grouped in 16 5-dimensional groups. The cores support DirectX 11 functions in hardware (Tessellation, OIT, Post-Processing, Shadows, HDR Texture Compression).  Compared to the HD 5600/5700 series which feature 400 cores, the core count of the HD5400 series is clearly cut down leading to a reduced computation power of 108 versus 360-520 (HD 5650) GigaFLOPs. Due to the high clock speed of the chip, the gap is not that big.

According to AMD, the HD 5000 series was also improved regarding general computing (as the HD4000 series was not optimized for this). Therefore, the performance of ATI stream, OpenCL, and DirectCompute 11 applications should be noticable better.

The Mobility Radeon HD 5000 series includes an improved video processor (UVD2) to decode HD videos with the graphic card. The new version is able to decode two HD streams simultaneously (e.g., for Blu-Ray picture in picture) if the graphic card offers enough memory bandwidth (which may not be the case for the HD 5450). Since the Flash 10.1 Beta, the 5000 series is also able to help accelerate Flash HD videos (like YouTube).

A special feature of the HD 5000 series is its ability to transmit HD audio formats (like Dolby True HD or DTS HD Master Audio) with up to 8 channels and 192 KHz / 24 Bit over HDMI 1.3a.

As the desktop HD 5000 series, the Mobility HD 5450 also supports Eyefinity to connect up to 4 monitors to the graphics chip. Of course, this depends on how many monitor outputs the laptop vendor adds to the laptop (and how they are wired). Most laptops will support three screens simultaneously (internal and two external).

The power consumption of the HD 5450 is a bit better than the 4570 / 5470 (both 13-15 W) and therefore the HD5450 can also be used for small laptops. According to AMD, the performance per watt ratio (same power consumption, better performance) and the Idle power consumption were improved (thanks to Memory Clock Scaling and Clock Gating). Furthermore, the chip does support PowerXpress (with AMD chipset) and Switchable Graphics (Intel) to switch between the dedicated and chipset / CPU graphics card (with improved switching times).

AMD Radeon HD 6310

► remove from comparison

The AMD Radeon HD 6310 (or perhaps also called ATI Mobility Radeon HD 6310) is an integrated graphics card in the Zacate netbook processor. It is based on the same graphics core as the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330 but without any dedicated memory. Furthermore, it features the newer UVD3 video processor.

The 3D performance of the HD 6310 should be beneath a HD 4330 due to the missing dedicated graphics memory (shared memory only). Gaming performance should therefore be similar to a Nvidia ION or Intel HD Graphics graphics card. In our tests the 6310 was only able to run low end games like Fifa 11, Sims 3 and Star Craft 2 single player in lowest detail settings fluently. More demanding games like Risen or Call of Duty series were not playable.

Other tests by techreport.comAnandtech.comHothardware.comLegitReviews.com, and PCPer.com on a Zacate prototype showed the following gaming performance:

running fluently

  • Call of Duty 4 - medium details (800x600 low - 61fps)
  • Quake Wars: 1024 Normal Quality: 20.4fps - in lower quality settings it should run fluently
  • Left 4 Dead 2 - 1366x768 medium details playable

playable with stuttering

  • Alien Swarm - 1366x768 low-medium: 15-30fps - playable
  • Call of Duty 6 MW2 - 1024 low 28fps - barely playable?
  • Dragon Age: Origins: 1024x768 low - 22fps - stuttering
  • StarCraft 2: 1366 low - 35fps - playable (no big battles)
  • Dirt 2 - 1366x768 low - 20fps - barely playable

not playable

  • Bioshock 2 - 1024 low - 23 fps
  • Civilization V Benchmark: 1366 low - GPU:7.8fps, CPU:25.4fps
  • Far Cry 2 - lowest Details in 1366x768 nur 16.6 fps
  • Just Cause 2 Demo - 800x600 low 18-20fps

Detailed gaming tests by us can be found further down on this page.

The new UVD3 video decoder allows the decoding of HD videos using the graphics card. It allows the parallel decoding of two MPEG2, H.264 and VC-1 streams and therefore compatible to BD-Live. Furthermore, the new UVD3 also supports DivX, Xvid and MPEG4 Part 2 decoding. Blu-Ray 3D via MCV (Multiview Video Coding) is theoretically supported by the UVD3 but wasn't available in the first laptops and platforms (no hardware accelleration and no HDMI 1.4 output).

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5450AMD Radeon HD 6310
Brazos Series
Mobility Radeon HD 5470 compare 80 @ 0.75 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Mobility Radeon HD 5450 80 @ 0.68 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Mobility Radeon HD 5430 compare 80 @ 0.55 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Radeon HD 7340 compare 80 @ 0.52 - 0.68 GHz
Radeon HD 6320 compare 80 @ 0.5 - 0.6 GHz
Radeon HD 7310 compare 80 @ 0.5 GHz
Radeon HD 6310 80 @ 0.5 GHz
Radeon HD 7290 compare 80 @ 0.28 - 0.4 GHz
Radeon HD 6290 compare 80 @ 0.28 - 0.4 GHz
Radeon HD 6250 compare 80 @ 0.28 GHz
CodenamePark ProZacate
ArchitectureTerascale 2Terascale 2
Pipelines80 - unified80 - unified
Core Speed675 MHz500 MHz
Memory Speed800 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3
Shared Memorynoyes
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Power Consumption11 Watt
Transistors292 Million
technology40 nm40 nm
Date of Announcement07.01.2010 16.11.2010
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.com
CPU in Radeon HD 6310GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD E-3502 x 1600 MHz, 18 W? MHz? MHz
AMD E-3002 x 1300 MHz, 18 W? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 252     avg: 272.2     median: 275 (0%)     max: 286 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 249     avg: 251.8     median: 251 (0%)     max: 257 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + AMD Radeon HD 6310
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 662     avg: 692     median: 691 (0%)     max: 720 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + AMD Radeon HD 6310
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 556     avg: 584     median: 593 (0%)     max: 595 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 7380     avg: 8277     median: 8348 (9%)     max: 8824 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
9262 Points (5%)
min: 5339     avg: 5670     median: 5719 (3%)     max: 5782 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 3299     avg: 3593     median: 3588 (4%)     max: 3765 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5450
3DMark 06
min: 3271     avg: 3776     median: 3775.5 (5%)     max: 4280 Points
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + AMD Radeon HD 6310
min: 1971     avg: 2080     median: 2026 (3%)     max: 2244 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + AMD Radeon HD 6310
3DMark 06
min: 1943     avg: 2011     median: 1984.5 (3%)     max: 2211 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + AMD Radeon HD 6310
3DMark 06
min: 2135     avg: 2220     median: 2243.5 (3%)     max: 2258 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
1.2 fps (0%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.2 Points (78%)
min: 5.5     avg: 5.6     median: 5.7 (72%)     max: 5.7 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
5 Points (63%)
min: 4.1     avg: 4.2     median: 4.2 (53%)     max: 4.2 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + AMD Radeon HD 6310
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 1476     avg: 1874     median: 1933 (1%)     max: 1981 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + AMD Radeon HD 6310
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 5.59     avg: 7.4     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 7.64 fps

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5450 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks AMD Radeon HD 6310 → 73% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
Radeon HD 6310:
46 55.2 ~ 51 fps
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
Radeon HD 6310:
11.8 12 12.3 ~ 12 fps
low 1024x768
Radeon HD 6310:
32 33.7 44.9 ~ 37 fps
med. 1360x768
Radeon HD 6310:
11.9 17 17.5 ~ 15 fps
low 800x600
Radeon HD 6310:
28 28.9 29 ~ 29 fps
med. 1024x768
Radeon HD 6310:
12.1 12.6 13 ~ 13 fps
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
Radeon HD 6310:
20.1  fps
high 1366x768
Radeon HD 6310:
11.4  fps
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
low 800x600
Radeon HD 6310:
17.7  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
Radeon HD 6310:
18.9 19.8 ~ 19 fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
Radeon HD 6310:
37.4 37.4 37.4 37.4 37.4 37.4 41.1 ~ 38 fps
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
Radeon HD 6310:
94  fps
med. 1024x768
Radeon HD 6310:
36  fps
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
low 640x480
Radeon HD 6310:
34.8  fps
high 1024x768
Radeon HD 6310:
20.9  fps
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

2008
low 640x480
Radeon HD 6310:
18.8  fps
high 1024x768
Radeon HD 6310:
10.1  fps
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
Radeon HD 6310:
24 24.8 ~ 24 fps
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
Radeon HD 6310:
25 25.3 ~ 25 fps
med. 1024x768
Radeon HD 6310:
14.6  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
Radeon HD 6310:
29 29.2 ~ 29 fps
med. 1024x768
Radeon HD 6310:
13.7  fps
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
low 800x600
Radeon HD 6310:
31  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 5450:
23  fps
35%
Radeon HD 6310:
8  fps

Average Gaming ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5450 → 100%

Average Gaming AMD Radeon HD 6310 → 35%

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5450AMD Radeon HD 6310
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Fifa 1151
Mafia 212
StarCraft 23715
CoD Modern Warfare 22913
Risen20.111.4
Resident Evil 517.7
Colin McRae: DIRT 219
Anno 140438
Sims 39436
Left 4 Dead34.820.9
Far Cry 218.810.1
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare24
Crysis - GPU Benchmark2514.6
Crysis - CPU Benchmark2913.7
World in Conflict - Benchmark23318
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5450AMD Radeon HD 6310
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps



1














< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
9
5
1
5
1

3











For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 28. 04:50:32

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1569 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 2040 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753671032s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 25 Jul 2025 05:18:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.034s ... 0.034s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.034s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.034s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 1569 +0.015s ... 0.049s

#9 got single benchmarks 1569 +0.005s ... 0.054s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 2040 +0s ... 0.054s

#11 got single benchmarks 2040 +0.018s ... 0.072s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.072s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.08s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.08s

#15 Got 46 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.084s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.084s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.085s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.006s ... 0.091s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.091s

#20 return log +0.001s ... 0.092s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)