Medion Mini E1210
Specifications

Price comparison
Average of 19 scores (from 31 reviews)
Reviews for the Medion Mini E1210
Source: Techradar
Archive.org versionMedion's Akoya Mini E1210 is a quintessentially good value netbook. Many manufacturers have taken MSI's Wind netbook and rebadged it under a range of names. The latest manufacturer to take this route is Medion, with its affordably priced Akoya Mini E1210. Although the Medion Akoya Mini E1210 is bettered by many other netbooks on the market, its low price, great storage and useful software still make it a compelling choice.
70
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/01/2009
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: vnunet.com
Archive.org versionPlenty to like, but a bigger battery is a must. Medion’s Akoya E1210 is a rebadged MSI Wind.
Medion’s E1210 really suffers from the small standard batteryvon 5: 4, Ausstattung 3, Leistung 3, Display gut, Mobilität schlecht
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/15/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% features: 60% display: 80% mobility: 40%
Source: Pocket Lint
Archive.org versionIf you are looking for a netbook then it is difficult to avoid those based on the MSI Wind and that’s not necessarily a bad thing. In terms of value for money, you certainly get a lot. The screen and keyboard are the real differentiators here as many of the tech specs are very close to competitor models. However, you can’t help feel that Medion have let the side down with omission of Bluetooth, which is now such a common feature of notebooks and something that mobile workers want and need. Yes, you can add a dongle, but why would you when it is integrated in so many other versions of this computer? Medion list the E1210 as £299.99 on their website which compares to a price of £279.99 in Aldi.
8 von 10, Display exzellent, Mobilität schlecht, Preis schlecht
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/15/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 40% display: 95% mobility: 40%
Source: vnunet.com
Archive.org versionMedion's Akoya E1210, on sale exclusively through Aldi stores from today, might look familiar to those who've been following the mini-notebook 'scene' since Asus's Eee PCs arrived at the end of last year. An impressive travel computer than could benefit from a battery upgrade
(von 5): 5, Mobilität mäßig, Leistung gut, Display gut
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/03/2008
Rating: Total score: 100% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 60%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Com! - 1/09

Comparison, , Long, Date: 01/01/2009
Rating: Total score: 67% price: 70% performance: 90% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 37% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80% emissions: 70%
Source: Magnus.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/15/2008
Rating: price: 80% display: 80% mobility: 40%
Source: PC Praxis

Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 12/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 70%
Source: Com! - 11/08

Single Review, , Very Short, Date: 12/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 80% features: 80% display: 50% mobility: 60%
Source: c't - 24/08

Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 12/01/2008
Rating: display: 80% mobility: 60%
Source: PC Games Hardware - 12/08

Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 12/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 87% price: 70% performance: 80% mobility: 40%
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy - 1-2/09

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 12/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% mobility: 60%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/24/2008
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 80% performance: 70% features: 30% display: 50% mobility: 50% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 80% emissions: 80%
Source: Computerbild - 22/08

Single Review, , Medium, Date: 10/16/2008
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 90% performance: 73% features: 86% display: 89% workmanship: 86% emissions: 90%
Source: Netzwelt
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/16/2008
Rating: performance: 80% features: 80% display: 80%
Source: T-Online
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/16/2008
Rating: display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Magnus.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/14/2008
Rating: mobility: 50%
Source: ZDNet
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/14/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Chip.de - 10/08

Single Review, , Very Short, Date: 10/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 40% price: 60% performance: 80%
Source: T-Online
DE→EN Archive.org versionComparison, online available, Short, Date: 09/26/2008
Rating: price: 50% display: 80% mobility: 40% ergonomy: 80%
Source: c't - 18/08

Comparison, , Long, Date: 08/15/2008
Rating: performance: 40% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 40% ergonomy: 80% emissions: 90%
Source: PC Praxis - 9/08

Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/01/2008
Rating: display: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Minitechnet
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/04/2008
Rating: price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% emissions: 80%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/03/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 70% features: 30% display: 70% mobility: 10% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 70% emissions: 80%
Source: Netzwelt
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/03/2008
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Chip.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/03/2008
Rating: Total score: 49% price: 80% performance: 30% features: 45% display: 79% mobility: 47% ergonomy: 67%
Source: Tom's Hardware
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/03/2008
Rating: performance: 70% display: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: PC Welt
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/03/2008
Rating: performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 40%
Source: Tom's Hardware - 7/08

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/01/2008
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerbild - 15/08

Single Review, , Long, Date: 07/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 90% performance: 80% features: 84% display: 80% ergonomy: 84% emissions: 80%
Source: Computer Totaal
NL→EN Archive.org versionComparison, online available, Short, Date: 04/23/2009
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: PCM
NL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/19/2008
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80%
Comment
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip on Mobile Intel 945GM chipset. It is a faster clocked version of the GMA 900 and supports no hardware T&L (Transform & Lightning) accelleration (which is required for some games).
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Atom: The Intel Atom series is a 64-Bit (not every model supports 64bit) microprocessor for cheap and small notebooks (so called netbooks), MIDs, or UMPCs. The speciality of the new architecture is the "in order" execution (instead of the usual and faster "out of order" execution). Therefore, the transistor count of the Atom series is much lower and, thus, cheaper to produce. Furthermore, the power consumption is very low. The performance per Megahertz is therfore worse than the old Pentium 3M (1,2 GHz on par with a 1.6 GHz Atom).
Z530:
Power saving version of the Atom N270 with additional Virtualization Support and more power saving techniques. The performance is equal to the N270 and therefore only suited for basic tasks.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.


