Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-T830 MP2 vs Qualcomm Adreno 302

ARM Mali-T830 MP2

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T830 MP2

The ARM Mali-T830 MP2 is an integrated graphics card for smartphones and tablets. It first appeared in the HiSilicon Kirin 650 in the beginning of 2016. The chip features two clusters and supports OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2 and DirectX 11 (FL 9_3). 

The performance should be similar to the old ARM Mali-450 MP4 and therefore non demanding Android games should run fluently.

The ARM Mali-T830 MP2 in the Kirin 650 is manufactured at TSMC at 16nm FF+ and therefore also suited for smaller smartphones.

Qualcomm Adreno 302

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 302

The Qualcomm Adreno 302 is an integrated graphics card for smartphones and tablets that is used for entry-level SoCs of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 series (e. g. MSM8210). The Adreno 302 is a slightly lower clocked version of the Adreno 305. Very demanding Android games of 2013 may not run completely smooth, but simple titles like Angry Birds and the usual multimedia tasks are no problem. The GPU offers unified shaders and supports OpenGL ES 3.0, OpenCL and DirectX 9.3.

Source: Qualcomm

ARM Mali-T830 MP2Qualcomm Adreno 302
Adreno 300 Series
Mali-T880 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T880 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T880 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T860 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T830 MP3 compare 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP2 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP1 compare 1
Adreno 330 compare 32 @ 0.45 - 0.58 GHz
Adreno 320 compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 308 compare 6
Adreno 306 compare 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 305 compare 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 304 compare 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 302 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Pipelines2 - unified6 - unified
Core Speed600 (Boost) MHz400 MHz
Shared Memorynoyes
APIDirectX 11 (FL 9_3), OpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 9.3, OpenGL ES 3.0
technology16 nm28 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2, DirectX 11 (FL 9_3)
Date of Announcement01.04.2016 20.06.2013
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
CPU in Mali-T830 MP2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 6598 x 2360 MHz? MHz? MHz
HiSilicon Kirin 6588 x 2350 MHz900 MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa8 x 1600 MHz700 MHz? MHz
min. - max.700 - 900 MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 302GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM82124 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 82102 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? - 900 MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

min: 3543     avg: 3599     median: 3592 (0%)     max: 3678 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 4548     avg: 6301     median: 6960 (1%)     max: 7395 Points
min: 1951     avg: 1991     median: 1986 (0%)     max: 2033 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
8002 Points (1%)
min: 4095     avg: 4219     median: 4171 (1%)     max: 4482 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.96     avg: 1     median: 1 (0%)     max: 1.1 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 2.6     avg: 2.7     median: 2.8 (0%)     max: 2.8 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T830 MP2
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 302
min: 3.3     avg: 4.1     median: 4.4 (0%)     max: 4.5 fps
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
57.8 fps (95%)
34.3 fps (57%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 8323     avg: 8545     median: 8542 (19%)     max: 8774 Points
1316 Points (3%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 15988     avg: 16554     median: 16613 (37%)     max: 17001 Points
3442 Points (8%)
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
49.7 fps (74%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 3565     avg: 3703     median: 3639 (4%)     max: 3967 Points
min: 2172     avg: 2356     median: 2297 (2%)     max: 2780 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1076     avg: 1184     median: 1160.5 (2%)     max: 1339 Points
min: 540     avg: 574     median: 584 (1%)     max: 591 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 2536     avg: 2656     median: 2655.5 (58%)     max: 2775 Points

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T830 MP2 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 302 → 36% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
med.
100%
Mali-T830 MP2:
13  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Mali-T830 MP2:
31 31 ~ 31 fps
ultra
100%
Mali-T830 MP2:
26 31 31 ~ 29 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-T830 MP2:
29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 35 49 51 52 56 57 58 ~ 40 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Mali-T830 MP2:
29 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Mali-T830 MP2:
16 18 22 22 22 23 25 25 26 27 28 28 29 30 ~ 24 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
100%
Mali-T830 MP2:
25 26 ~ 26 fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Mali-T830 MP2:
58  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-T830 MP2 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

ARM Mali-T830 MP2lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile13
Arena of Valor3129
Dead Trigger 240
Asphalt 8: Airborne3024
Real Racing 326
Subway Surfers58
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2

1


2
2

1








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 28. 20:12:15

#0 checking url part for id 7310 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5509 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 May 2024 05:35:22 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.11s ... 0.111s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.111s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.111s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7310 +0.042s ... 0.153s

#8 got single benchmarks 7310 +0.05s ... 0.203s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 5509 +0.002s ... 0.205s

#10 got single benchmarks 5509 +0.025s ... 0.23s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.23s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.089s ... 0.318s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.318s

#14 Got 50 rows for game benchmarks. +0.021s ... 0.34s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.34s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.342s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.015s ... 0.358s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.358s

#19 return log +0.04s ... 0.398s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)