ERROR: No GPU found with the ID:2375

getGPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German GPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected) ARM Mali-450 MP4 vs Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core vs
Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-450 MP4 vs Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core vs

ARM Mali-450 MP4

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-450 MP4

The ARM Mali-450 MP4 is an OpenGL ES 2.0 capable GPU for ARM SoCs (System on a Chip). It is primarily designed for tablets and smartphones with mobile operating systems like Android. MP4 is the version with four cores (so called fragment processors). 

Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core

► remove from comparison Vivante Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core

The Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core is an integrated graphics card for ARM based SoCs. It supports Android, Windows Mobile 6, Windows CE and Linux and the standards OpenGL ES 2.0, OpenGL 2.1, OpenVG 1.1, and DirectX 11 (9_3). The chip is can be clocked with up to 600 MHz (28nm LP) or 800 MHz (28nm HPM). The theoretical calculating power of the GPU is 50 Mio triangles / s, 650 Mio pixels / s and 12 GFLOPS (according to cnx-software.com). According to Vivante however the GC1000 is capable of 345 to 460 Mio triangles /s and 11 to 15 GFLOPS.

► remove from comparison

show full text
ARM Mali-450 MP4Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
ArchitectureUtgard
Core Speed700 MHz600 / 800 MHz
Shared Memorynono
APIOpenGL ES 2.0DirectX 9_3, OpenGL 2.1 / ES 2.0
technology28 nm
Date of Announcement21.06.2012 12.09.2013
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
Series
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core 2 @ 0.6 GHz
GC800 1 @ 0.32 - 0.58 GHz
Extreme Graphics 2 @ 0.13 GHz
PXP
unknown
Pipelines2 - unified
CPU in Mali-450 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 6208 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
Mediatek MT65928 x 1700 - 2000 MHz700 MHz? MHz
Intel Atom x3-C3230RK4 x 1100 MHz? MHz? MHz
Mediatek MT81274 x 1500 MHz600 MHz? MHz
min. - max.600 - 700 MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
100%
1  +
1415 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
100%
1  +
1257 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 2848     avg: 5368     median: 5253 (1%)     max: 6599 Points
min: 2237     avg: 2329     median: 2373 (0%)     max: 2377 Points
4960%
 +
260552 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 2858     avg: 3691     median: 3574 (0%)     max: 4424 Points
min: 997     avg: 1177     median: 1207.5 (0%)     max: 1295 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
100%
1  +
18705 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
100%
1  +
27236 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
100%
1  +
4075 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 4363     avg: 5530     median: 5382 (1%)     max: 6686 Points
min: 1912     avg: 2310     median: 2255 (0%)     max: 2694 Points
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
0 fps (0%)
0 fps (0%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-450 MP4
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 8.9     avg: 10.4     median: 10.1 (0%)     max: 16 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
min: 2.5     avg: 2.8     median: 2.7 (0%)     max: 3.3 fps
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Off-screen
1651 Points (57%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Score
4981 Points (44%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 GPU
5503 Points (57%)
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
min: 24.7     avg: 34.7     median: 31.3 (52%)     max: 53.9 fps
min: 13.87     avg: 18     median: 20.1 (33%)     max: 20.09 fps
Basemark X 1.0 - Basemark X 1.0 Off-Screen
min: 1.246     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (8%)     max: 2.262 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 3417     avg: 3663     median: 3612.5 (8%)     max: 4142 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 8224     avg: 9791     median: 9924 (22%)     max: 11110 Points
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
min: 52.2     avg: 56.7     median: 57.4 (85%)     max: 62.9 fps
min: 38.2     avg: 48.8     median: 49.5 (74%)     max: 58 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 1545     avg: 2090     median: 2200.5 (2%)     max: 2730 Points
min: 1549     avg: 1910     median: 1798 (2%)     max: 2667 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 903     avg: 1073     median: 1123 (2%)     max: 1253 Points
min: 682     avg: 707     median: 688 (1%)     max: 753 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 2057     avg: 3042     median: 3131 (68%)     max: 4171 Points
min: 1832     avg: 2304     median: 2322 (50%)     max: 2758 Points
40%
 +
1254 Points (27%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
5.2 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-450 MP4 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core → 60% n=2

Average Benchmarks → 2500% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
:
56  fps
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dead Trigger 256
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps






1










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 03. 23:57:24

#0 checking url part for id 5487 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4572 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 2375 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 May 2024 05:36:19 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.112s ... 0.113s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.113s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.113s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 5487 +0.032s ... 0.145s

#9 got single benchmarks 5487 +0.041s ... 0.186s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 4572 +0.002s ... 0.188s

#11 got single benchmarks 4572 +0.012s ... 0.199s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 2375 +0.002s ... 0.201s

#13 got single benchmarks 2375 +0.227s ... 0.428s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.428s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.065s ... 0.493s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.495s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.029s ... 0.524s

#18 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.524s

#19 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.524s

#20 Got 1 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.534s

#21 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.534s

#22 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.535s

#23 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.538s

#24 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.538s

#25 return log +0.002s ... 0.54s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)