Mediatek MT6737T vs Mediatek MT6750

Mediatek MT6737T

► remove from comparison MT6737T

The MediaTek MT6737T is a 64-bit ARM-based SoC announced in 2016 primarily designed for smartphones (mainly Android devices). It is manufactured in a 28 nm process and consists of four CPU cores based on the 64-bit Cortex-A53 architecture clocked at up to 1.5 GHz (MT6737 up to 1.35 GHz). The GPU is an ARM Mali-720 MP2. It integrates a Cat.4 LTE modem with CDMA2000 as well as a video de- and encoder for 1080p30 videos (H.264 and H.265).

Processor

The Cortex-A53 is the successor to the popular Cortex-A7 design. In addition to the jump from 32-bit to 64-bit architecture (ARMv8 ISA) to address more than 4 GB of memory, the new design offers better branch prediction and higher performance-to-power ratio that rivals the Cortex-A9. The four cores of the MT6737 are clocked at up to 1.5 GHz and are roughly on par with the Snapdragon 410 (4x Cortex-A53 at 1.2 to 1.4 GHz). The processor is fit for common tasks like browsing and running light applications.

Graphics

The integrated single-core Mali-T720 is an entry-level GPU clocked between 550-650 MHz for the MT6737 (or 600 for the MT6737T). Most Android games will play at acceptable frame rates on low or medium resolutions and quality.

Features

Besides CPU and GPU, the MT6737T SoC also integrates a memory controller (1x LPDDR2/3 733 MHz), multiple radios (WLAN, Bluetooth, GPS), and a cellular modem (GSM, UMTS, GPRS, HSPA+, HSUPA, TD-SCDMA, EVDO, and LTE Cat 4). Its integrated video engine allows for 1080p playback at 30 FPS. Cameras are supported up to 13 MP.

Mediatek MT6750

► remove from comparison MT6750

The ARM-based Mediatek MT6750 SoC (System on a Chip) is a mid-range mobile processor announced in Q2 2016 for smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It integrates 8 ARM Cortex-A53 cores consisting of 4 high-performance cores clocked at up to 1.5 GHz plus 4 low-power cores clocked at up to 1 GHz each. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a Cat. 6 LTE radio and an ARM Mali-T860 MP2 GPU with 802.11n WiFi and Bluetooth connectivity.

The Cortex-A53 is the successor to the Cortex-A7 and introduces 64-Bit support (ARMv8-ISA). Its performance-per-Watt is significantly higher and is even slightly ahead of the old Cortex-A9. If utilizing all 8 of its cores, the Cortex-A53 can rival competing mobile processes in the high-end class range. However, no practical software has been specifically coded to use all 8 cores at such high performance levels.

The integrated GPU is the modern ARM Mali-T860 MP2 (two clusters) clocked at up to 520 MHz. It should be able to run all current Android games.

In addition to the CPU and GPU cores, the SoC also contains a memory controller and the aforementioned Cat.6 LTE modem (FDD/TDD, DC-HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA2000, EDGE) with both 802.11n WiFi and Bluetooth. The integrated video engine is able to record and playback 1080p videos at up to 30 FPS in hardware. Cameras are supported at up to 16 MP.

The MT6750 is still manufactured in 28nm and so power efficiency is not on par with modern 14/16nm chips.

Mediatek MT6737TMediatek MT6750
Mediatek Mediatek
Cortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Mediatek Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8768 compare1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67501.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
» Mediatek MT6737T1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8768 compare1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
» Mediatek MT67501.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
1500 MHz1500 MHz
4 / 48 / 8
28 28
Rel. 9, Cat. 4 LTE (FDD & TDD), DC-HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA2000 1x/EVDO Rev. A, EDGE, 802.11n Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0, 13MP image signal-processor,Cat. 6 LTE (FDD & TDD), DC-HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA2000, EDGE, 802.11a/b/g/n WiFi, Bluetooth, 16 MP ISP, 1080p recording/playback, ARM Mali-T860 MP2 GPU
iGPUARM Mali-T720 MP2 ( - 600 MHz)ARM Mali-T860 MP2 ( - 530 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Mediatek MT6750

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 9251     avg: 9889     median: 9888.5 (6%)     max: 10526 Points
min: 9078     avg: 9342     median: 9341.5 (6%)     max: 9605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 9155     avg: 9839     median: 9838.5 (10%)     max: 10522 Points
min: 8965     avg: 9227     median: 9227 (10%)     max: 9489 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 7424     avg: 10350     median: 10755 (11%)     max: 11393 Points
min: 4811     avg: 9040     median: 9924 (10%)     max: 10553 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 824     avg: 947     median: 969 (12%)     max: 984 Points
min: 694     avg: 1093     median: 1108.5 (14%)     max: 1244 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 767     avg: 897     median: 919.5 (16%)     max: 988 Points
min: 703     avg: 1082     median: 1118 (19%)     max: 1256 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 620     avg: 627     median: 626 (10%)     max: 634
651 (10%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1390     avg: 1612     median: 1684 (4%)     max: 1761
1849 (5%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 648     avg: 668     median: 672 (9%)     max: 682
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1807     avg: 1869     median: 1876.5 (3%)     max: 1932
min: 1790     avg: 2520     median: 2617 (4%)     max: 2765
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 10544     avg: 12142     median: 12434.9 (21%)     max: 13300 ms
min: 11708.2     avg: 14563     median: 13762.8 (23%)     max: 22626.8 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1861 ms (20%)
2042 ms (22%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 2684     avg: 3200     median: 3266 (5%)     max: 3483 Points
min: 1994     avg: 3095     median: 3200 (5%)     max: 3506 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
100%
1 MT6737T +
1044 Points (28%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
100%
1 MT6737T +
1575 Points (35%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
100%
1 MT6737T +
2524 Points (33%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 35747     avg: 38233     median: 38372 (13%)     max: 40981 Points
min: 38547     avg: 41781     median: 42181 (14%)     max: 44842 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 3408     avg: 4433     median: 4603 (14%)     max: 5117 Points
min: 4039     avg: 4519     median: 4450.5 (14%)     max: 5154 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 13570     avg: 14637     median: 14561.5 (18%)     max: 15853 Points
min: 14268     avg: 14682     median: 14603 (18%)     max: 15471 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 2634     avg: 2695     median: 2710 (1%)     max: 2724 Points
min: 1456     avg: 9393     median: 10312.5 (3%)     max: 11934 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 21781     avg: 21973     median: 21901.5 (13%)     max: 22308 Points
min: 23454     avg: 24798     median: 24751.5 (15%)     max: 26669 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 41484     avg: 43737     median: 44135 (8%)     max: 45193 Points
min: 52278     avg: 54391     median: 54413 (10%)     max: 56639 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
2040 Points (0%)
3715%
MT6750 +
min: 75193     avg: 75778     median: 75778 (10%)     max: 76363 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
2760 Points (9%)
min: 2451     avg: 2933     median: 2917 (9%)     max: 3445 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 2249     avg: 3163     median: 3245 (21%)     max: 3487 Points
min: 2782     avg: 3221     median: 3254 (21%)     max: 3394 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 2759     avg: 4041     median: 4285 (21%)     max: 4607 Points
min: 3667     avg: 4271     median: 4287 (21%)     max: 4532 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 MT6750 +
min: 1430     avg: 1580     median: 1568.5 (8%)     max: 1754 Points

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT6737T → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT6750 → 282% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)