Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M2 8-Core GPU vs Apple M4 8-core GPU

Apple M2 8-Core GPU

► remove from comparison Apple M2 8-Core GPU

The Apple M2 8-core GPU is an integrated graphics card offering 8 of the 10 cores designed by Apple and integrated in the Apple M2 SoC. It uses the unified memory architecture of the M2 SoC (up to 24 GB LPDDR5-6400 with 100 GB/s bandwidth) and should offer 128 execution units.

The performance is positioned right between the old 8-core model in the M1 GPU and the higher end 10-core model in the M2. The theoretical performance should be around 2.9 Teraflops, as the 8-core version offers the same 1,398 MHz maximum clock rate as the 10-core version. Compared to other iGPUs from AMD and Intel, the M2 benefits greatly from the unified memory architecture and the high bandwidth.

The M2 chip is manufactured in the second generation 5nm process at TSMC (most likely N5P). The power consumption is around 10 Watt (in our tests under load of the MBP13) compared to the 13.5W of the 10-core version.

Apple M4 8-core GPU

► remove from comparison Apple M4 8-Core GPU

The 8-core Apple M4 GPU is a graphics adapter built into the smallest Apple M4 series SoC that debuted in October 2024 alongside the new iMac. It isn't clear if this is a 10-core M4 GPU with two cores disabled, or if Apple actually makes an entirely new M4 SoC now that has fewer CPU and GPU cores by design.

A few popular video codecs can be HW-decoded and HW-encoded here but the list is nowhere near as long as what current AMD iGPUs deliver, let alone Intel iGPUs. However, there is a healthy selection of modern technologies such as ray tracing on offer.

Just like the rest of the Apple M4 chip, the graphics adapter is manufactured on a "second generation 3 nm" TSMC process that's still cutting-edge, as of late 2024. It has access to the 16 or 24 gigabytes of fast on-package LPDDR5x-7500 RAM and, apart from the iMac's internal display, allows one to connect one more monitor with an "up to 6K" resolution whereas the 10-core M4 GPU can drive 2 such monitors.

Its performance is slated to be around 15% lower than that of the 10-core M4 GPU. Still, it's going to be at least as fast as the Radeon 760M in many tasks, including gaming.

Apple M2 8-Core GPUApple M4 8-core GPU
Apple M4 Series
M2 Max 38-Core GPU compare 38
M2 Max 30-Core GPU compare 30
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU compare 19 @ 0.44 - 1.4 GHz
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU compare 16
M2 10-Core GPU compare 10 @ 1.4 GHz
M2 8-Core GPU 8 @ 1.4 GHz
M4 Max 40-Core GPU compare 40 ? Bit @ 8533 MHz
M4 Max 32-Core GPU compare 32 ? Bit @ 8533 MHz
M4 Pro 20-Core GPU compare 20 ? Bit @ 8533 MHz
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU compare 16
M4 10-Core GPU compare 10
M4 8-Core GPU 8
Pipelines8 - unified8 - unified
Core Speed1398 (Boost) MHz
Memory TypeLPDDR5-6400LPDDR5X-7500
Shared Memorynoyes
Power Consumption10 Watt4 Watt
technology5 nm3 nm
Date of Announcement06.06.2022 28.10.2024
PredecessorM1 8-Core GPUM3 8-Core GPU
CPU in M4 8-Core GPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Apple M4 (8 cores)8 x 2900 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
21009 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
5689 Points (7%)
7612 Points (9%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom METAL *
110 Seconds (12%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Apple M2 8-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
128.6 fps (8%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Apple M2 8-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.5 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
39.8 fps (15%)
48.5 fps (18%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
91 fps (16%)
106.7 fps (19%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
247 fps (18%)
304.8 fps (23%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
199.9 fps (19%)
231.4 fps (22%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
306.9 fps (6%)
324.7 fps (7%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
483.7 fps (20%)
520 fps (22%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Apple M2 8-Core GPU
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
839 fps (7%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Apple M4 8-core GPU
810 fps (6%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
30872 Points (8%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Metal
48032 Points (27%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
24.4 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
27.4 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
18.5 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
21.5 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
0.6 fps per Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 8-Core GPU → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Apple M4 8-core GPU → 115% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
M4 8-Core GPU:
98  fps
med. 1920x1080
M4 8-Core GPU:
78.2  fps
high 1920x1080
M4 8-Core GPU:
62.9  fps
low 1920x1080
M4 8-Core GPU:
53.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
M4 8-Core GPU:
46.3  fps
high 1920x1080
M4 8-Core GPU:
40.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
M4 8-Core GPU:
28.7  fps
low 1920x1080
M4 8-Core GPU:
25.9  fps
med. 1920x1080
M4 8-Core GPU:
20.3  fps
high 1920x1080
M4 8-Core GPU:
17  fps
ultra 1920x1080
M4 8-Core GPU:
14.3  fps
low 1920x1080
M4 8-Core GPU:
39.7  fps
med. 1920x1080
M4 8-Core GPU:
27.8  fps
high 1920x1080
M4 8-Core GPU:
23.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
M4 8-Core GPU:
22.6  fps
low 1280x720
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
43  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
29.7  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
16.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
13.4  fps
low 1280x720
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
77  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
39  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
18  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
14  fps
low 1280x720
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
62  fps
166%
M4 8-Core GPU:
103  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
28  fps
139%
M4 8-Core GPU:
39  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
24  fps
142%
M4 8-Core GPU:
34  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
20  fps
150%
M4 8-Core GPU:
30  fps

Average Gaming Apple M2 8-Core GPU → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Apple M4 8-core GPU → 149%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 140%

Apple M2 8-Core GPUApple M4 8-core GPU
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Civilization 79878.262.9
Total War Pharaoh53.246.340.728.7
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty25.920.31714.3
Baldur's Gate 339.727.823.122.6
Shadow of the Tomb Raider62282420103393430
Apple M2 8-Core GPUApple M4 8-core GPU
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1
1


1


1








< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
3
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 05. 10:26:11

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11375 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12846 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754382371s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 05 Aug 2025 10:22:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.03s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.03s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11375 +0.009s ... 0.039s

#9 got single benchmarks 11375 +0.003s ... 0.042s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12846 +0s ... 0.043s

#11 got single benchmarks 12846 +0.003s ... 0.046s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.046s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.056s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.056s

#15 Got 43 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.059s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.059s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.059s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.062s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.062s

#20 return log +0s ... 0.062s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)