Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs HiSilicon Kirin 658

HiSilicon Kirin 970

► remove from comparison

The HiSilicon Kirin 970 is an ARM based high-end octa-core SoC for smartphones and tablet, which was introduced with the Huawei Mate 10 in late 2017. Besides 8 CPU cores (4x Cortex-A73, 4x Cortex-A53), the SoC is also equipped with a modern Mali-G72 MP12 graphics adapter, a dual-channel LPDDR4 memory controller as well as an LTE (4x4 MIMO, 5-band-carrier-aggregation, QAM-256, up to 1.2 Gbit/s) modem.

The performance cluster is clocked at up to 2.4 GHz and the four A53 power saving cores with up to 1.8 GHz. The performance should improve by about 20 percent according to Huawei and the power consumption reduced by 20 percent.

On the chip HiSilicon also included a dedicated Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for running machine learning tasks very efficiently compared to the CPU cores.

HiSilicon Kirin 658

► remove from comparison  Kirin 658

The HiSilicon Kirin 658 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC for mid-range smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2017 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores. Four cores can be clocked with up to 1.7 GHz (power saving cores) and four with up to 2.35 GHz (performance cores). The difference to the older Kirin 650 and Kirin 655 SoCs is the higher clock speed of the performance cores (2.35 versus 2.1 and 2.0 GHz).

Furthermore, a ARM Mali-T830 MP2 graphics card (at 900 MHz with 40.8 GFLOPS), a 64-Bit LPDDR3 memory controller and a dual-sim capable LTE Cat. 6 (max. 300 MBit/s and GSM, WCDMA, UMTS, HSPA+) radio are integrated in the SoC. The processor performance can be compared with the older Kirin 930 and therefore sufficient for daily usage as browsing and non demanding apps. High-end SoCs with Cortex-A57 or A72 cores however should be noticeably faster. The SoC is produced in a modern 16nm FinFET process and is therefore very power efficient.

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 970HiSilicon Kirin 658
Series
CodenameCortex-A73/-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 970 « 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960 compare2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960s compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710A compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
JLQ JR510 compare1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 « 2.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 650 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock2400 MHz2350 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Transistors5500 Million
Technology10 nm16 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G71 MP12 GPU, 4x Cortex-A73 (2.4 GHz) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.8 GHz, big.LITTLE), 2x LTE Dual-SIM (4x4-MIMO, QAM-256, up to 1,2 Gbit/s)ARMv8-ISA, Mali-T830 MP2, Dual SIM LTE (Cat. 6), LPDDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-G72 MP12ARM Mali-T830 MP2 (900 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 14556     avg: 21027     median: 22026 (19%)     max: 23046 Points
13510 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1897     avg: 2707     median: 2819 (33%)     max: 3002 Points
1608 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 1891     avg: 2732     median: 2836 (32%)     max: 2983 Points
1554 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
386 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1655     avg: 1712     median: 1711.5 (5%)     max: 1768 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1883     avg: 1901     median: 1901 (19%)     max: 1922 Points
913 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6557     avg: 6697     median: 6714.5 (7%)     max: 6792 Points
3460 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2009     avg: 2010     median: 2010 (27%)     max: 2011 Points
874 Points (12%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6512     avg: 6519     median: 6519 (16%)     max: 6526 Points
3348 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6160     avg: 6205     median: 6204.5 (10%)     max: 6249 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1926     avg: 1933     median: 1933 (29%)     max: 1940 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 1993     avg: 2317     median: 2316.5 (19%)     max: 2640 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 3758     avg: 3857     median: 3857 (35%)     max: 3956 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 11044     avg: 11246     median: 11245.5 (22%)     max: 11447 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 5485     avg: 5541     median: 5540.5 (11%)     max: 5596 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 6800     avg: 6878     median: 6877.5 (18%)     max: 6955 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 3591     avg: 4378     median: 3875.5 (5%)     max: 6221 ms
8591 ms (10%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 6692     avg: 10111     median: 11085 (10%)     max: 11838 Points
4589 Points (4%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
69 Points (14%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 173653     avg: 177915     median: 178490 (61%)     max: 181973 Points
60438 Points (21%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 9493     avg: 13104     median: 13673 (42%)     max: 14768 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 28440     avg: 42105     median: 44676.5 (55%)     max: 45397 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 68813     avg: 75722     median: 76492.5 (24%)     max: 81761 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 46027     avg: 66879     median: 70808.5 (43%)     max: 72307 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 152773     avg: 197811     median: 206548 (36%)     max: 212278 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
202050 Points (27%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
596 min (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 4617     avg: 4787     median: 4730 (25%)     max: 5015 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 14120     avg: 14492     median: 14670 (31%)     max: 14687 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 6293     avg: 6860     median: 6957 (45%)     max: 7046 Points
4464 Points (29%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 8115     avg: 8537     median: 8484.5 (42%)     max: 9326 Points
5794 Points (29%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 970 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 658 → 56% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 28. 03:02:43

#0 checking url part for id 9236 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8960 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.138s ... 0.139s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.139s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9236 +0.003s ... 0.142s

#7 got single benchmarks 9236 +0.029s ... 0.171s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8960 +0.003s ... 0.174s

#9 got single benchmarks 8960 +0.008s ... 0.181s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.181s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.145s ... 0.326s

#12 return log +0.052s ... 0.378s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)