Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939

HiSilicon Kirin 970

► remove from comparison

The HiSilicon Kirin 970 is an ARM based high-end octa-core SoC for smartphones and tablet, which was introduced with the Huawei Mate 10 in late 2017. Besides 8 CPU cores (4x Cortex-A73, 4x Cortex-A53), the SoC is also equipped with a modern Mali-G72 MP12 graphics adapter, a dual-channel LPDDR4 memory controller as well as an LTE (4x4 MIMO, 5-band-carrier-aggregation, QAM-256, up to 1.2 Gbit/s) modem.

The performance cluster is clocked at up to 2.4 GHz and the four A53 power saving cores with up to 1.8 GHz. The performance should improve by about 20 percent according to Huawei and the power consumption reduced by 20 percent.

On the chip HiSilicon also included a dedicated Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for running machine learning tasks very efficiently compared to the CPU cores.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 615 MSM8939

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 is a mid-range ARMv8-based SoC largely for Android tablets and smartphones. Announced in February 2014, the S615 is one of the first 64-bit capable SoCs from Qualcomm. In addition to 8 Cortex-A53 CPU cores at up to 1.7 GHz, the SoC integrates an Adreno 405 GPU with a 2x 32-bit memory controller (LPDDR3-1600, 12.8 GB/s) and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac), Bluetooth 4.0, UMTS, and LTE.

CPU

The Cortex-A53 is the successor to the very popular Cortex-A7 design. In addition to the new 64-bit capable ARMv8 ISA, the cores offer a variety of other improvements such as better branch prediction. This leads to a significantly higher performance per clock, which is even above the older Cortex-A9.

The eight cores of the Snapdragon 615 are divided into two quad-core clusters, each optimized for a different operating point. While one cluster can clock up to 1.7 GHz to handle more demanding applications, the other cluster is limited to a maximum of 1.0 GHz for energy-saving purposes. All eight cores can be active at the same time, although most applications aren't parallelized to support 8 cores efficiently.

Overall, the Snapdragon 615 offers a performance similar to that of the older Snapdragon 600 (Krait architecture).

GPU

Another new feature is the integrated graphics unit named Adreno 405 (550 MHz). The Adreno 400 series has been substantially redesigned and supports DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_1) including hardware tessellation, OpenGL ES 3.1, and OpenCL 1.2. Furthermore, the performance has been significantly improved, which is now similar to the Adreno 320 and PowerVR G6200.

Features

The Snapdragon 615 offers numerous wireless technologies such as Bluetooth 4.0 and WLAN 802.11a/b/g/n/ac as well as a Multi-SIM cellular modem supporting LTE cat. 4 (up to 150 Mbps), WCDMA, CDMA, EV-DO, TD-SCDMA and GSM/EDGE.

The SoC can encode and decode 1080p videos using dedicated hardware and stream content to displays with up to 2560 x 2048 pixels. A large number of video codecs including H.265 (playback only) will be supported. The camera ISP can handle sensors with up to 21 MP.

Power Consumption

The Snapdragon 615 is manufactured by TSMC in a 28 nm LP process. According to the specifications, we expect a medium or medium-high power consumption for use in medium-sized or larger smartphones and tablets.

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 970Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
Series Qualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameCortex-A73/-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Snapdragon Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 970 « 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960 compare2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960s compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710A compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 « 1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM8936 compare1.7 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock2400 MHz1700 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Transistors5500 Million
Technology10 nm28 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G71 MP12 GPU, 4x Cortex-A73 (2.4 GHz) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.8 GHz, big.LITTLE), 2x LTE Dual-SIM (4x4-MIMO, QAM-256, up to 1,2 Gbit/s)Adreno 405 GPU, 802.11ac WLAN, Bluetooth, LTE, NFC, GPS/GLOSNASS/BeiDou, 32/64 Bit LPDDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-G72 MP12Qualcomm Adreno 405 ( - 550 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 5569     avg: 7208     median: 7132.5 (6%)     max: 8902 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 5564     avg: 6969     median: 7003 (6%)     max: 9155 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 14556     avg: 21027     median: 22026 (19%)     max: 23046 Points
min: 5758     avg: 8220     median: 7460.5 (6%)     max: 15857 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1897     avg: 2707     median: 2819 (33%)     max: 3002 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 1891     avg: 2732     median: 2836 (32%)     max: 2983 Points
991 Points (11%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
386 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1655     avg: 1712     median: 1711.5 (5%)     max: 1768 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1883     avg: 1901     median: 1901 (19%)     max: 1922 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6557     avg: 6697     median: 6714.5 (7%)     max: 6792 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2009     avg: 2010     median: 2010 (27%)     max: 2011 Points
626 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6512     avg: 6519     median: 6519 (16%)     max: 6526 Points
1561 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6160     avg: 6205     median: 6204.5 (10%)     max: 6249 Points
min: 2291     avg: 2667     median: 2720 (4%)     max: 3046 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1926     avg: 1933     median: 1933 (29%)     max: 1940 Points
min: 676     avg: 689     median: 681 (10%)     max: 717 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2103     avg: 2483     median: 2370 (4%)     max: 3202 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 539     avg: 674     median: 638 (12%)     max: 940 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 1993     avg: 2317     median: 2316.5 (19%)     max: 2640 Points
523 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 3758     avg: 3857     median: 3857 (35%)     max: 3956 Points
1615 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 11044     avg: 11246     median: 11245.5 (22%)     max: 11447 Points
4043 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 5485     avg: 5541     median: 5540.5 (11%)     max: 5596 Points
2255 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 6800     avg: 6878     median: 6877.5 (18%)     max: 6955 Points
2579 Points (7%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 257.9     avg: 317.6     median: 280.6 (9%)     max: 490 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 116.6     avg: 212.9     median: 218.3 (21%)     max: 420 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 3591     avg: 4378     median: 3875.5 (5%)     max: 6221 ms
min: 5061     avg: 13398     median: 13126 (15%)     max: 20190 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 793     avg: 1235     median: 1213 (13%)     max: 1688 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
1178 ms (11%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 6692     avg: 10111     median: 11085 (10%)     max: 11838 Points
min: 2672     avg: 3696     median: 3411 (3%)     max: 6999 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
69 Points (14%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
min: 924     avg: 1197     median: 1184.5 (32%)     max: 1493 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
min: 817     avg: 1275     median: 1238.5 (28%)     max: 1805 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
min: 1849     avg: 2628     median: 2521.5 (33%)     max: 3619 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 17712     avg: 20407     median: 19790 (46%)     max: 23719 points
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
min: 27825     avg: 33966     median: 32024 (32%)     max: 49293 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 173653     avg: 177915     median: 178490 (61%)     max: 181973 Points
min: 29823     avg: 33247     median: 33119 (11%)     max: 36800 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 9493     avg: 13104     median: 13673 (42%)     max: 14768 Points
4376 Points (13%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 28440     avg: 42105     median: 44676.5 (55%)     max: 45397 Points
14864 Points (18%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 68813     avg: 75722     median: 76492.5 (24%)     max: 81761 Points
8960 Points (3%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 46027     avg: 66879     median: 70808.5 (43%)     max: 72307 Points
26765 Points (16%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 152773     avg: 197811     median: 206548 (36%)     max: 212278 Points
54965 Points (10%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
min: 260     avg: 453.3     median: 417 (13%)     max: 683 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
min: 6830     avg: 12463     median: 12017 (39%)     max: 18542 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
202050 Points (27%)
min: 10592     avg: 12997     median: 12996.5 (2%)     max: 15401 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
596 min (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 4617     avg: 4787     median: 4730 (25%)     max: 5015 Points
1756 Points (9%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 14120     avg: 14492     median: 14670 (31%)     max: 14687 Points
3900 Points (8%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 6293     avg: 6860     median: 6957 (45%)     max: 7046 Points
3293 Points (22%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 8115     avg: 8537     median: 8484.5 (42%)     max: 9326 Points
min: 3045     avg: 3504     median: 3536 (18%)     max: 3959 Points

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 970 → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 → 34% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 02. 21:10:57

#0 checking url part for id 9236 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5691 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.053s ... 0.055s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.055s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9236 +0.003s ... 0.058s

#7 got single benchmarks 9236 +0.02s ... 0.077s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 5691 +0.003s ... 0.08s

#9 got single benchmarks 5691 +0.033s ... 0.113s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.113s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.175s ... 0.289s

#12 return log +0.029s ... 0.317s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)