HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs HiSilicon Kirin 655

HiSilicon Kirin 930

► remove

The HiSilicon Kirin 930 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC (system-on-a-chip) for smartphones and tablets. It was launched in the first half of 2015. It integrates two quad-core clusters of Cortex-A53 cores (big.LITTLE). The performance cluster clocks at up to 2 GHz, the power saving cluster at up to 1.5 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a ARM Mali-T628 MP4 graphics card and LTE Cat. 6 modem. The SoC is manufactured in 28nm and thanks to the small Cortex-A53 cores also suited for smaller smartphones.

HiSilicon Kirin 655

► remove Kirin 655

The HiSilicon Kirin 655 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC for mid-range smartphones and tablets. It was announced late 2016 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores. Four cores can be clocked with up to 1.7 GHz (power saving cores) and four with up to 2.1 GHz (performance cores). The difference to the older Kirin 650 is the 100 MHz higher clock speed of the performance cores.

Furthermore, a ARM Mali-T830 MP2 graphics card (at 600 MHz or 900 MHz with 40.8 GFLOPS), a 64-Bit LPDDR3 memory controller and a dual-sim capable LTE Cat. 6 (max. 300 MBit/s and GSM, WCDMA, UMTS, HSPA+) radio are integrated in the SoC. The processor performance can be compared with the older Kirin 930 and therefore sufficient for daily usage as browsing and non demanding apps. High-end SoCs with Cortex-A57 or A72 cores however should be noticeably faster. The SoC is produced in a modern 16nm FinFET process and is therefore very power efficient.

HiSilicon Kirin 930HiSilicon Kirin 655
Cortex-A53Cortex-A53
: Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6552.1 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 650 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
» HiSilicon Kirin 9302 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8168 compare2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
» HiSilicon Kirin 6552.1 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 650 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9302 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8168 compare2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
2000 MHz2100 MHz
8 / 88 / 8
28 16
ARM Mali-T628 MP4 GPU, 4x Cortex-A53e (2.0 GHz) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.5 GHz, big.LITTLE), LTE Cat. 6, 2x 32 Bit LPDDR3-1600 Memory ControllerARMv8-ISA, Mali-T830 MP2, Dual SIM LTE (Cat. 6), LPDDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-T628 MP4 ( - 600 MHz)ARM Mali-T830 MP2 (900 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
9337 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 9404     avg: 9487     median: 9499 (10%)     max: 9557 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 10447     avg: 10528     median: 10494 (11%)     max: 10643 Points
min: 13535     avg: 13553     median: 13535 (14%)     max: 13590 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
1438 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
1391 Points (24%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2955     avg: 3212     median: 3211.5 (6%)     max: 3468
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 698     avg: 761     median: 760.5 (16%)     max: 823
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3458     avg: 3498     median: 3497.5 (5%)     max: 3537
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 864     avg: 873     median: 872.5 (18%)     max: 881
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 780     avg: 784     median: 784 (12%)     max: 788
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3240     avg: 3291     median: 3290.5 (8%)     max: 3341
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 272.043     avg: 272     median: 272.3 (9%)     max: 272.482 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 120.972     avg: 122     median: 121.5 (12%)     max: 122.028 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 9903     avg: 11085     median: 11543.5 (19%)     max: 11807.9 ms
min: 8768.2     avg: 9071     median: 9070.8 (15%)     max: 9373.3 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 1021.4     avg: 1093     median: 1092.5 (12%)     max: 1163.6 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 3866     avg: 4211     median: 4084 (7%)     max: 4682 Points
min: 4199     avg: 4415     median: 4414.5 (7%)     max: 4630 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
1254 Points (34%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
2044 Points (46%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
2756 Points (36%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
13277 points (31%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
min: 45927     avg: 47313     median: 47313 (48%)     max: 48699 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
52322 Points (18%)
min: 56764     avg: 56781     median: 56781 (19%)     max: 56798 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
1338 Iter./s (41%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
20284 Iter./s (67%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
125047 Points (16%)
162396 Points (21%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 4358     avg: 4432     median: 4458 (22%)     max: 4479 Points
min: 4383     avg: 4401     median: 4401 (22%)     max: 4419 Points

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 930 → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 655 → 113% n=6

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)