Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 655 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000W

HiSilicon Kirin 655

► remove from comparison  Kirin 655

The HiSilicon Kirin 655 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC for mid-range smartphones and tablets. It was announced late 2016 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores. Four cores can be clocked with up to 1.7 GHz (power saving cores) and four with up to 2.1 GHz (performance cores). The difference to the older Kirin 650 is the 100 MHz higher clock speed of the performance cores.

Furthermore, a ARM Mali-T830 MP2 graphics card (at 600 MHz or 900 MHz with 40.8 GFLOPS), a 64-Bit LPDDR3 memory controller and a dual-sim capable LTE Cat. 6 (max. 300 MBit/s and GSM, WCDMA, UMTS, HSPA+) radio are integrated in the SoC. The processor performance can be compared with the older Kirin 930 and therefore sufficient for daily usage as browsing and non demanding apps. High-end SoCs with Cortex-A57 or A72 cores however should be noticeably faster. The SoC is produced in a modern 16nm FinFET process and is therefore very power efficient.

HiSilicon Kirin 9000W

► remove from comparison  Kirin 9000W

The HiSilicon Kirin 9000W is an SoC that can be used in smartphones and tablets based on Android and was first installed in the Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2.

Huawei does not reveal any information about the SoC. The little information that is available comes from benchmarks and system analysis tools. The CPU consists of three clusters with a total of 12 cores. The power-saving cluster has four ARM Cortex-A510 cores, each operating at up to 1,530 MHz, while six other cores use unspecified cores from HiSilicon (0x0D42) and clock at up to 2,150 MHz. The third cluster contains two HiSilicon cores (0x0D02), each with a maximum clock speed of 2,487 MHz. The performance cores could possibly be based on the TaiShan V120 architecture (as in the Kirin 9000S).

The single-core performance is correspondingly mixed, but the multi-core performance is at the level of a high-end SoC from 2022 due to the numerous cores.

A Maleoon 910 by HiSilicon is integrated as the graphics unit, similar to the 9000S (where it was clocked with up to 750MHz).

Nothing concrete is known about the manufacturing process or the architecture. The SoC will probably be manufactured in 7 nm at SMIC.

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 655HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
Series
CodenameCortex-A53
Series:
JLQ JR510 compare1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 « 2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 650 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
newitem compare cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W « 1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHzcores
Apple A6 compare1 GHzcores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST comparecores
unknown compare cores
Clock2100 MHz1530 - 2490 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 812 / 12
2 x 2.5 GHz
6 x 2.2 GHz
4 x 1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Technology16 nm7 nm
FeaturesARMv8-ISA, Mali-T830 MP2, Dual SIM LTE (Cat. 6), LPDDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-T830 MP2 (900 MHz)HiSilicon Maleoon 910
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 13535     avg: 13553     median: 13535 (11%)     max: 13590 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
1438 Points (6%)
5690 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
1391 Points (16%)
5614 Points (64%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1174 Points (32%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
4088 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
867 Points (37%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3878 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4712 Points (47%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
13978 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 780     avg: 784     median: 784 (11%)     max: 788 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3240     avg: 3291     median: 3290.5 (8%)     max: 3341 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 8768     avg: 9071     median: 9070.5 (11%)     max: 9373 ms
1202 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
203.8 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4199     avg: 4415     median: 4414.5 (4%)     max: 4630 Points
33982 Points (31%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
99 Points (28%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 56764     avg: 56781     median: 56781 (19%)     max: 56798 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
655341 Points (40%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
182634 Points (50%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
162396 Points (21%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 4383     avg: 4401     median: 4401 (22%)     max: 4419 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
110.5 MB/s (81%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
1435 MB/s (44%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
63.2 MB/s (78%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
1522 MB/s (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
45015 Points (71%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
10620 Points (49%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
834 Points (32%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
8.2 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.2 Watt (5%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 655 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 9000W → 420% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 20. 14:10:07

#0 checking url part for id 8478 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17388 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.106s ... 0.107s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.107s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8478 +0.003s ... 0.11s

#7 got single benchmarks 8478 +0.016s ... 0.126s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17388 +0.003s ... 0.13s

#9 got single benchmarks 17388 +0.01s ... 0.14s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.14s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.103s ... 0.243s

#12 return log +0.026s ... 0.269s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)