Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 650 vs UNISOC Tiger T310

HiSilicon Kirin 650

► remove from comparison  Kirin 650

The HiSilicon Kirin 650 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC for mid-range smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2016 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores. Four cores can be clocked with up to 1.7 GHz (power saving cores) and four with up to 2 GHz (performance cores). Furthermore, a ARM Mali-T830 MP2 graphics card (at 600 MHz with 40.8 GFLOPS), a 64-Bit LPDDR3 memory controller and a dual-sim capable LTE Cat. 6 (max. 300 MBit/s and GSM, WCDMA, UMTS, HSPA+) radio are integrated in the SoC.

The processor performance can be compared with the older Kirin 930 and therefore sufficient for daily usage as browsing and non demanding apps. High-end SoCs with Cortex-A57 or A72 cores however should be noticeably faster.

The SoC is produced in a modern 16nm FinFET process and is therefore very power efficient.

 

UNISOC Tiger T310

► remove from comparison  T310

The Unisoc Tiger T310 is a SoC for smartphones and tablets of the entry level. It was first announced in mid 2019 and integrates four CPU cores (quad core). One big Cortex-A75 core clocked at up to 2 GHz and three small A55 cores with up to 1.8 GHz.

Furthermore, the chip integrates an LTE modem (Cat 7, TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), Bluetooth 5.0 and WiFi b/g/n/ac. The integrated ISP supports up to two cameras (16 MPixel and 8 Mpixel, maximum 30 fps video capture) and the GNSS can use all current standards (GPS, Glonass, Beidou, Galileo).

The memory controller is able to drive LPDDR3 at 933 MHz and faster LPDDR4x at 1333 MHz.

The PowerVR GE8300 iGPU is from Imagination and clocked at up to 800 MHz.

The chip is produced in 12nm at TSMC and should offer a rather good power efficiency (for 2019).

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 650UNISOC Tiger T310
Series
CodenameCortex-A53
Series:
JLQ JR510 compare1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 650 « 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 « 1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHzcores
Apple A6 compare1 GHzcores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST comparecores
unknown compare cores
Clock2000 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 84 / 4
Technology16 nm12 nm
FeaturesARMv8-ISA, Mali-T830 MP2, Dual SIM LTE (Cat. 6), LPDDR3 Memory ControllerLTE Cat.7, BT 5.0, WiFi ac, GNSS, eMMC 5.1, LPDDR3 933, LPDDR4x 1333 MHz
iGPUARM Mali-T830 MP2 (900 MHz)PowerVR GE8300 ( - 800 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.unisoc.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
11640 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 13588     avg: 13632     median: 13632 (11%)     max: 13676 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
1440 Points (6%)
110%
T310 +
1588 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 T310 +
1590 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T310 +
376 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T310 +
756 Points (1%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T310 +
1687 Points (17%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T310 +
2969 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3768     avg: 3841     median: 3841 (6%)     max: 3914 Points
2987 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 883     avg: 895     median: 894.5 (13%)     max: 906 Points
185%
T310 +
1656 Points (25%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 9111     avg: 9254     median: 9254 (11%)     max: 9397 ms
108%
T310 +
3239 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4188     avg: 4472     median: 4472 (4%)     max: 4756 Points
268%
T310 +
11986 Points (11%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 T310 +
45 Points (13%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 T310 +
63 Points (13%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
1434 Points (38%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
1965 Points (44%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
3356 Points (44%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 50366     avg: 51755     median: 51754.5 (18%)     max: 53143 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 T310 +
162595 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 T310 +
57138 Points (16%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
142543 Points (19%)
1653 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 5120     avg: 5230     median: 5229.5 (26%)     max: 5339 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 T310 +
9900 Points (16%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 T310 +
6866 Points (32%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T310 +
3.7 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 T310 +
1.6 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 650 → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks UNISOC Tiger T310 → 125% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 17. 22:48:31

#0 checking url part for id 8075 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14530 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:21:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.092s ... 0.094s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.094s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8075 +0.003s ... 0.096s

#7 got single benchmarks 8075 +0.012s ... 0.108s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14530 +0.003s ... 0.111s

#9 got single benchmarks 14530 +0.009s ... 0.119s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.119s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.114s ... 0.234s

#12 return log +0.035s ... 0.268s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)