, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

HiSilicon Kirin 650 vs HiSilicon Kirin 935

HiSilicon Kirin 650

► remove from comparison Kirin 650

The HiSilicon Kirin 650 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC for mid-range smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2016 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores. Four cores can be clocked with up to 1.7 GHz (power saving cores) and four with up to 2 GHz (performance cores). Furthermore, a ARM Mali-T830 MP2 graphics card (at 600 MHz with 40.8 GFLOPS), a 64-Bit LPDDR3 memory controller and a dual-sim capable LTE Cat. 6 (max. 300 MBit/s and GSM, WCDMA, UMTS, HSPA+) radio are integrated in the SoC.

The processor performance can be compared with the older Kirin 930 and therefore sufficient for daily usage as browsing and non demanding apps. High-end SoCs with Cortex-A57 or A72 cores however should be noticeably faster.

The SoC is produced in a modern 16nm FinFET process and is therefore very power efficient.

 

HiSilicon Kirin 935

► remove from comparison

The HiSilicon Kirin 935 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC (system-on-a-chip) for smartphones and tablets. It was launched in the first half of 2015. It integrates two quad-core clusters of Cortex-A53 cores (big.LITTLE). The performance cluster clocks at up to 2.2 GHz, the power saving cluster at up to 1.5 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a ARM Mali-T628 MP4 graphics card and LTE Cat. 6 modem. The SoC is manufactured in 28nm and thanks to the small Cortex-A53 cores also suited for smaller smartphones.

HiSilicon Kirin 650HiSilicon Kirin 935
Cortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9352.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
» HiSilicon Kirin 6502 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
» HiSilicon Kirin 9352.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6502 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
2000 MHz2200 MHz
8 / 88 / 8
16 28
ARMv8-ISA, Mali-T830 MP2, Dual SIM LTE (Cat. 6), LPDDR3 Memory ControllerARM Mali-T628 MP4 GPU, 4x Cortex-A53e (2.2 GHz) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.5 GHz, big.LITTLE), LTE Cat. 6, 2x 32 Bit LPDDR3-1600 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-T830 MP2 (900 MHz)ARM Mali-T628 MP4 ( - 600 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 9176     avg: 9767     median: 9766.5 (6%)     max: 10357 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
11640 Points (12%)
min: 9379     avg: 9823     median: 9822.5 (10%)     max: 10266 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 13588     avg: 13632     median: 13632 (14%)     max: 13676 Points
min: 10360     avg: 11016     median: 11015.5 (11%)     max: 11671 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
1440 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3768     avg: 3841     median: 3841 (6%)     max: 3914
min: 3888     avg: 3929     median: 3929 (6%)     max: 3970
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 883     avg: 895     median: 894.5 (18%)     max: 906
min: 941     avg: 949     median: 949 (19%)     max: 957
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
800 (10%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2912 (5%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 270.13     avg: 276     median: 276.3 (9%)     max: 282.524 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 127.15     avg: 128     median: 128.4 (13%)     max: 129.572 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 9111.2     avg: 9254     median: 9253.9 (16%)     max: 9396.5 ms
min: 11028.7     avg: 13952     median: 13952.3 (23%)     max: 16876 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 942     avg: 992     median: 991.9 (11%)     max: 1041.8 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4188     avg: 4472     median: 4472 (6%)     max: 4756 Points
min: 4106     avg: 4376     median: 4376 (6%)     max: 4646 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
1434 Points (38%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
1965 Points (44%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
3356 Points (44%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
min: 47515     avg: 47624     median: 47623.5 (48%)     max: 47732 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 50366     avg: 51755     median: 51754.5 (18%)     max: 53143 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
6127 Points (19%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
18789 Points (23%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
6649 Points (2%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
33799 Points (21%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
65364 Points (12%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
142543 Points (19%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 5120     avg: 5230     median: 5229.5 (26%)     max: 5339 Points
min: 4625     avg: 4749     median: 4748.5 (24%)     max: 4872 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
0 min (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
3902 Points (26%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 650 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 935 → 93% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 31. 09:53:52

#0 checking url part for id 8075 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6774 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 27 Jul 2021 13:08:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.037s ... 0.037s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.037s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8075 +0s ... 0.038s

#7 got single benchmarks 8075 +0.007s ... 0.045s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6774 +0s ... 0.045s

#9 got single benchmarks 6774 +0.007s ... 0.052s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.052s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.011s ... 0.063s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.063s

#13 return log +0.004s ... 0.067s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)