Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435

Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757

► remove from comparison Mediatek Helio P20 MT6757

The Mediatek Helio P20 MT6757 is an upper mainstream ARM SoC for smartphones (mainly Android based) that was introduced in 2016. It is manufactured in a 16 nm FinFET process and is equipped with 8 ARM Cortex-A53 CPU cores clocked at 2.3 GHz (max.). The chip also includes an LTE modem (Cat. 6).

The integrated ARM Mali T880 MP2  GPU is clocked at up to 900 MHz and has two cluster (from 16) from the Midgard (4th Gen) architecture.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 435

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 435

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (SD435) is a lower mainstream SoC for (Android based) smartphones and tablets. Contrary to the Snapdragon 630, it is still manufactured in a 28-nm process and also consists of an octa-core CPU part with ARM Cortex-A53 cores. However, they are only clocked at up to 1.4 GHz. The integrated X9 LTE modem supports Cat. 4 with maximum transfer rates of 300 Mbps (downstream) and 100 Mbps (upstream). The SoC also includes an Adreno 505 GPU with support for Vulkan and OpenGL ES 3.1. WiFi 802.11ac and Bluetooth 4.1 are supported as well. The memory controller supports LPDDR3 clocked at 800 MHz (so probably dual-channel DDRL-1600). The main difference to the Snapdragon 430 is the faster LTE modem.

ModelMediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
SeriesMediatek Mediatek Helio 20Qualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Snapdragon Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P25 compare2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A25 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T compare2.3 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 « 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM8936 compare1.7 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 « 1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock2300 MHz1400 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology16 nm28 nm
FeaturesUMTS/HSPA+, LTE Cat. 6, TD-SCDMA, Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, 4K Video Encoder, H.265, PowerVR Series 6 GPUAdreno 505 GPU, 802.11ac WLAN, Bluetooth 4.1, LTE Cat. 7, Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1600 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-T880 MP2 (900 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 505
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturermediatek-helio.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
15008 Points (12%)
53%
435 +
7935 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
14927 Points (12%)
52%
435 +
7745 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 12063     avg: 14755     median: 15176.5 (13%)     max: 16603 Points
59%
435 +
min: 7095     avg: 8887     median: 9015.5 (8%)     max: 9345 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1340     avg: 1666     median: 1731 (7%)     max: 1928 Points
67%
435 +
min: 1028     avg: 1199     median: 1167.5 (5%)     max: 1352 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 1338     avg: 1740     median: 1814.5 (21%)     max: 1991 Points
63%
435 +
min: 1002     avg: 1182     median: 1152 (13%)     max: 1382 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 828     avg: 847     median: 845 (8%)     max: 869 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3414     avg: 3657     median: 3580 (4%)     max: 4053 Points
72%
435 +
min: 2210     avg: 2610     median: 2582 (3%)     max: 2889 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 435 +
577 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 435 +
2308 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 9506     avg: 13219     median: 10072.5 (12%)     max: 23224 ms
96%
435 +
min: 11007     avg: 12667     median: 12750 (15%)     max: 13586 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 435 +
1979 ms (22%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 3609     avg: 4347     median: 4376.5 (4%)     max: 5024 Points
73%
435 +
min: 2689     avg: 3112     median: 3209 (3%)     max: 3314 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 435 +
27 Points (6%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 59082     avg: 63462     median: 64833 (22%)     max: 66472 Points
70%
435 +
min: 42643     avg: 44884     median: 45572 (16%)     max: 46814 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
6021 Points (18%)
76%
435 +
min: 4213     avg: 4532     median: 4581.5 (14%)     max: 4750 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
16835 Points (21%)
95%
435 +
min: 14261     avg: 15880     median: 16055.5 (20%)     max: 17146 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
9958 Points (3%)
96%
435 +
min: 9541     avg: 9568     median: 9563 (3%)     max: 9605 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
25160 Points (15%)
110%
435 +
min: 27075     avg: 27665     median: 27740 (17%)     max: 28105 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
57974 Points (10%)
99%
435 +
min: 56672     avg: 57644     median: 57289 (10%)     max: 59326 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
130988 Points (17%)
62%
435 +
81667 Points (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
1870 Points (10%)
100%
435 +
min: 1646     avg: 1876     median: 1875.5 (10%)     max: 2105 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
3269 Points (7%)
211%
435 +
min: 4303     avg: 6883     median: 6882.5 (15%)     max: 9462 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 3801     avg: 4218     median: 4217.5 (28%)     max: 4634 Points
88%
435 +
min: 3538     avg: 3737     median: 3710 (24%)     max: 3928 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 4477     avg: 4977     median: 4768.5 (24%)     max: 5893 Points
101%
435 +
min: 4316     avg: 4876     median: 4814.5 (24%)     max: 5438 Points

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 → 86% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 21. 00:29:50

#0 checking url part for id 8564 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8506 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.019s ... 0.02s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.02s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8564 +0.003s ... 0.022s

#7 got single benchmarks 8564 +0.021s ... 0.044s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8506 +0.002s ... 0.046s

#9 got single benchmarks 8506 +0.034s ... 0.079s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.079s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.108s ... 0.187s

#12 return log +0.021s ... 0.208s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)