ERROR: No CPU found with the ID:17594

getCPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German CPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected) Mediatek Helio G35 vs
Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Helio G35 vs

Mediatek Helio G35

Mediatek Helio G35

The Mediatek Helio G35 is an entry level ARM SoC for smartphones (mainly Android based) that was introduced in late 2020. It is manufactured in a 12 nm FinFET process and is equipped with 8 ARM Cortex-A53 CPU cores clocked at up to 2.3 GHz. Compared to the similar Helio G25, the G35 offers higher CPU clock speeds (+ 300 MHz), GPU clock speeds (+30 MHz) and supports higher display resolutions of up to 2400 x 1800.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a LTE Cat.4 modem, a Wi-Fi 5 / Bluetooth 5.0 modem, a LPDDR3-933 / LPDDR4-1200 / LPDDR4x-1600 memory controller, a IMG PowerVR GE8320 graphics card, and a 1080p30 video de- and encoder (H.265 decoding, H.264 encoding).

► remove from comparison
show full text
ModelMediatek Helio G35
CodenameCortex-A53
SeriesMediatek Mediatek Helio G
Series: Mediatek Helio G Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio G37 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio G35 « 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio G36 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio G25 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Clock2300 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 8
Technology12 nm
FeaturesUMTS/HSPA+, LTE Cat. 4, Cat-7 DL / Cat-13 UL, LPDDR3-933 / LPDDR4-1200 / LPDDR4x-1600 Memory Controller, 1080p30 H.264 Video Encoder, H.264 / H.265 1080p30 Decoder
iGPUPowerVR GE8320 ( - 680 MHz)
ArchitectureARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio G35
0.3 pt (24%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -48%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
0.1785 -43%
MediaTek MT8168
0.1792 -43%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
0.2028 -36%
Samsung Exynos 7904
0.2136 -32%
Mediatek Helio G25
0.2329 -26%
Mediatek MT8768
0.2861 -9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
0.2949 -7%
Mediatek Helio A25
0.3082 -2%
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
0.3136 -1%
Mediatek Helio G35
0.3157
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3354 6%
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
0.3465 10%
Samsung Exynos 850
0.3734 18%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
0.4139 31%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
0.4418 40%
Mediatek Helio P65
0.4442 41%
Mediatek Helio G88
0.4616 46%
Mediatek MT8183
0.4633 47%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 47%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 312%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 839     avg: 1086     median: 1073 (10%)     max: 1304 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 954     avg: 1156     median: 1173 (13%)     max: 1343 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 149     avg: 167.2     median: 170 (7%)     max: 178 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 538     avg: 780     median: 881 (2%)     max: 965 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
783 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3585 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
753 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3421 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
3535 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
797 Points (12%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
10031 ms (12%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 5007     avg: 5370     median: 5369.5 (4%)     max: 5732 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
34 Points (6%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
25846 Points (22%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
24983 Points (20%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
14363 Points (3%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
41824 Points (15%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
107016 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
0 Points (0%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
0 Points (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
1727 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
4665 Points (2%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 5208     avg: 5333     median: 5297 (19%)     max: 5581 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5279     avg: 5437     median: 5436.5 (36%)     max: 5594 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
226 Points (8%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.16     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (1%)     max: 2.23 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0.801     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.886 Watt

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio G35 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 19. 10:39:56

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13249 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17594 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755592796s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Aug 2025 05:19:27 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13249 +0.004s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 13249 +0.009s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17594 +0.001s ... 0.017s

#10 got single benchmarks 17594 +0s ... 0.017s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.008s ... 0.025s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.025s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.03s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.03s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)