Notebookcheck Logo

Vivante GC7000UL vs ARM Mali-400 MP

Vivante GC7000UL

► remove from comparison

The Vivante GC7000UL is an integrated low end GPU for ARM based smartphones and tablets. It is mostly used for Android based devices and the performance should be similar to the Adreno 305. It is used in the Marvell Technology Group Armada PXA1908 SoC (e.g. in the Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3).

The 3D performance is only suited for low resolution screens. In our review of the Xcover 3 for example Asphalt 8 ran fluently in high detail settings.

ARM Mali-400 MP

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-400 MP

The ARM Mali-400 MP is an OpenGL ES 2.0 capable graphics card for ARM based SoCs (System on a Chip). Therefore, the chip is intended to be used in tablets and smartphones. The graphics card can be scaled from one to four cores (so called fragment processors). Furthermore, it got one vertex processor and should perform slightly below a PowerVR SGX 543MP2 (most likely the top version).

show full text
Vivante GC7000ULARM Mali-400 MP
Mali-400 MP Series
GC7000UL 8
GC4000 compare 8
Mali-400 MP4 compare 4/1 cores
Mali-400 MP2 compare 2/1 cores
Mali-400 MP 1-4/1 cores
Pipelines8 - unified1-4 / 1 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Shared Memorynono
APIOpenGL ES 3.1OpenGL ES 2.0
Date of Announcement01.01.2014 02.06.2008
ArchitectureUtgard
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
CPU in GC7000ULGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Marvell Armada PXA19084 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-400 MPGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek MT83122 x 1300 MHz416 MHz? MHz
MediaTek MT65722 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 x 1000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
2591 Points (0%)
min: 1690     avg: 2311     median: 2404 (0%)     max: 2468 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
1412 Points (0%)
min: 667     avg: 1321     median: 1500.5 (0%)     max: 1753 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
3274 Points (0%)
min: 1471     avg: 2329     median: 2479 (0%)     max: 2896 Points
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
0.8 fps (0%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Vivante GC7000UL
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
5.4 fps (0%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-400 MP
min: 1.1     avg: 4     median: 4.2 (0%)     max: 7.8 fps
AnTuTu 3DRating - 3DRating V4.0 for OpenGL ES 2.0
1981 Points (15%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Off-screen
min: 1030     avg: 1216     median: 1240 (43%)     max: 1355 Points
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Score
min: 1838     avg: 2394     median: 2310 (20%)     max: 3600 Points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 GPU
min: 1638     avg: 2894     median: 2495 (26%)     max: 4814 Points
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
min: 8.45     avg: 25.9     median: 22 (36%)     max: 56.3 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
983 Points (2%)
min: 1697     avg: 1728     median: 1719 (4%)     max: 1769 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
4078 Points (9%)
min: 4813     avg: 4961     median: 4956 (11%)     max: 5142 Points
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
min: 21.6     avg: 44.3     median: 47.2 (70%)     max: 67.3 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
3000 Points (3%)
min: 1704     avg: 2221     median: 2188 (2%)     max: 2587 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
739 Points (1%)
min: 518     avg: 668     median: 704.5 (1%)     max: 733 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
3781 Points (82%)
min: 1450     avg: 2249     median: 2106 (46%)     max: 3299 Points

Average Benchmarks Vivante GC7000UL → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-400 MP → 97% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 28. 00:30:56

#0 checking url part for id 6271 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2821 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 May 2024 05:40:03 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.086s ... 0.087s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.087s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.087s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 6271 +0.025s ... 0.112s

#8 got single benchmarks 6271 +0.006s ... 0.117s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 2821 +0.001s ... 0.119s

#10 got single benchmarks 2821 +0.058s ... 0.177s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.177s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.061s ... 0.237s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.237s

#14 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.011s ... 0.248s

#15 return log +0.044s ... 0.292s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)